On Friday, August 9, 2019 at 7:23:09 PM UTC-4, The True Doctor
Post by The True Doctor Post by firstname.lastname@example.org Post by The True Doctor Post by The True Doctor Post by The True Doctor Post by The True Doctor Post by The True Doctor
Where is someone at the BBC claiming the Earth is flat
or being sacked
from Doctor Who for it, apart of course from Chibnall?
Where is anyone at the BBC claiming Chibnall has been
Where is anyone at the BBC saying that he wasn't? All they need to do is
Since when have the BBC ever been obliged to respond to
every fan rumour?
They've had 9 months to deny the rumours that he's either been
sacked or his contract will not be renewed for a further
series, and they still haven't. Rumours like this were never
allowed to build up under Moffat or RTD. When news broke that
Eccleston had quit it was confirmed within weeks.
Post by The True Doctor Post by The True Doctor Post by The True Doctor
Why wasn't Chibnall at Comic Con in Chicago last week to
show? Maybe it's because he was sacked?
Um. Just perhaps he's rather busy working on a new series of
something called Doctor Who...
The word is he isn't. He's not submitting scripts in on time,
and all of them are requiring major re-writers and re-filming
needs to be done to make them watchable after the reaction of
the test audiences. That would also explain why there was
nothing to show of Series 12 at Comic Con either, despite 6
months of filming already, and why it's been delayed until next
year when it should have been out this Autumn. The BBC saw
Chibnall's shoddy scrips for this series this time last year
and they knew he wouldn't be able to complete them on time
because they didn't contain any of the elements they required,
so he was sacked. The question is had the BBC had enough of his
vile SJW agenda attacking the show's male fans, and demeaning
the female ones, or did the want more of it?
Post by The True Doctor Post by The True Doctor Post by The True Doctor Post by The True Doctor Post by Idlehands
It's funny that you believe an unsubstantiated
YouTube video clearly marked "rumour" but not a
reputable magazine. So much for being "rational and
The Radio Times claimed Chibnall had said there would
not be a female
Doctor. Both of them lied. Call that reputable?
At no point did anyone say there would not be a female
Doctor. You're lying.
Wrong! Chibnall lied, Moffat lied, and the Radio Times
lied; just like
Barbara Broccoli lied if you get down to the real essence of
the questions they were asked.
Still can't find any genuine references to back up your
claim. Why's that, do you think?
We know that a woman was cast to play 007 despite Broccoli
saying there would not be a female James Bond. To all intents
and purposes a lie, and Moffat and Chibnall's likes were even
more direct than that.
There is no "female James Bond." There is a woman who has
inherited the "007" designation, but she's NOT "James Bond," nor
is she "Jane Bond."
She should have never inherited the 007 designation, unless it's to
show that woman are not suitable to work as secret agents, or with
them, in keeping with what Ian Fleming said in his James Bond
novels, and this could just as easily have been done by giving her
a different designation, so unfortunately she's going to be used to
attack James Bond fans and men in general.
Yeah, "Goldfinger," Bond muses that people like Pussy Galore exist
because weak men let them. Later, after finding out Pussy "became" a
lesbian because she'd been raped by her uncle, Bond finishes the
adventure by violently kissing her! Way to trigger, dude! Fleming
knew NOTHING about male/female relationships. He knew sexual
fantasies that immature fanboys like you would sweat over, that it.
Fleming knew everything he needed to know about male/female
relationships. He wasn't the best writer of romances (Edgar Rice
Burroughs takes that accolade) but he knew women were weaker than men
and a woman attempting to do a man's job as a secret agent was likely to
lead to her being raped, abused, or forced into having sex to save her
life by people who have no sense of morality, and that includes SJWs.
Either that or her only way of doing her job or surviving was to be a
promiscuous whore like Mata Hari to begin with. That's not the role
model you want to encourage for women to adopt.
James Bond is a male franchise. It's there to cater to male fantasies,
and there is nothing wrong with that, as for example it stops them from
abusing women in real life.
Post by The True Doctor
Daniel Craig, will be in the movie as a "retired" Bond who has
Post by email@example.com
to get back into the game. This tells me that she's not going to
make it to the end of the film and Bond will be re-established as
The way it's looking, she's going to be a man hating lesbian, and
James Bond wouldn't give a shit for a woman like that considering
the ending of Casino Royale (the book), so if they have him seeking
revenge for her death, it's not going to work.
The way it's looking, you have serious issues in regards to strong
women in leading roles. I said once that I feel sorry for you, that
You are the one with issues. Unless this female 007 is put in her place
like every other woman Bond encounters, then it's not going to be James
Bond. If she's a lesbian, then Bond must be seen to dominate her in the
end and show that he was right all the long, as in the example you gave
above, and there is nothing wrong with that either. If the chauvinistic
lesbian feminist bigots don't like that, then tough, James Bond wasn't
created for them, and it's not their place to ruin other people's
enjoyment because they can't stand the thought of men having sex with
women they want to convert.
And hey! Just because you couldn't get a date for the prom does NOT
mean every strong woman is a "man hating lesbian."
You are fantasizing. You have no idea what heterosexual women really
desire, and it's not what the lesbian feminist bigots desire. Using a
franchise like James Bond, Batman, or Doctor Who to impose lesbian
feminist fantasies about how heterosexual men and women should behave
(basically that they shouldn't even exist) on heterosexuals is
unacceptable and disgusting. Heterosexual women desire to be feminine,
and, as has been stated and proven by Professor John Norman, to be
possessed by a masculine man who wants to be enslaved by the women he
loves; and once again there is nothing wrong with that at all, and even
if this is not true, which it isn't, there's nothing wrong with
expressing it in fiction which is there for men's enjoyment.
Post by The True Doctor Post by firstname.lastname@example.org Post by The True Doctor
There are no genuine references to back up the Radio Time's
claim. The BBC are afraid of even more turmoil and a collapse
of merchandise sales, which they are already being sued over,
if they confirm that they sacked Chibnall, so they have chosen
to remain silent. Notice the they have not denied the licensed
merchandisers are suing them, either.
And after 'Kerblam' you wonder why Doctor Who is no longer
going to be on Amazon Prime (presumably in America, because
I've not even bothered to look for the current series on Prime
in the UK, which I am paying for, because it's so bad and
unwatchable) and is moving to HBO Max; and Gillette lost $8
billion dollars after calling their customers misogynists,
child abuses, and toxic males.
I'm certain Doctor Who will survive not having Amazon's support. The
story was a good one. Get over yourself.
Doctor Who is dead. Get woke, go broke!
Post by The True Doctor Post by email@example.com Post by The True Doctor
The BBC's vile agenda has even reached 'Good Omens' which the
BBC have contaminated with attacks on the so called
'The Expanse' is how you do Science Fiction. No calling all
male viewers bad fathers, not attacking them because they are
men, and not insulting men in general, or people because they
are white; and look at how diverse that is.