Discussion:
S10E05 Oxygen
(too old to reply)
Agamemnon
2017-05-13 21:41:45 UTC
Permalink
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.

The Doctor is blinded and he's able to rewire and reprogramme a nuclear
reactor control system, one that he's never ever seen before?

Moffat is totally out of his mind.

What was the point of parodying the Star Trek, "Space - the Final
Frontier" voice over only for Capaldi to make a complete and utter fool
of himself doing it?

Once again a bunch morons are sent out into space, on a mining ship,
without any training and no clue whatsoever how to do anything in
accordance with health and safety regulations which look to be totally
non-existent in any case.

You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when lecturing about
what happens if someone is exposed to empty space without a suit and
then it turning out that he's lecturing about the wrong subject. Totally
amateurish foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at the start.
Rather than write a proper relationship letting it progress and then
killing of the he has her say 'I want to have your children' to the man
and then she's killed off. Terrible writing. Absolutely terrible. Why
should I give a damn about either of them when the writer hasn't
properly introduced their characters to the audience and built them up
in advance? The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script
is in completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks everyone
watching can read his mind and connect the missing back story in between
the lines.

How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees without any
consequences? This series is a complete and utter joke.

Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a pantomime with
loony left politically motivated script writing plummeting to the depths
of the Sylvester McCoy era and even lower still.

If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next 8
episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.


6/10 for entertainment

It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a 'plot' became
impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed to have exchanged space
suits with Bill and been blinded, none of which was actually shown.

1/10 for scriptwriting

Complete and utter garbage.

How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you are wearing
a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being used when their were on
the ship.

Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for the air
you need to breath and do your job properly?

Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily find on
the planet instead of gold or platinum?

Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill the people
wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?

A total fucking utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
The Doctor
2017-05-13 22:43:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
Were you paying attention?
Post by Agamemnon
The Doctor is blinded and he's able to rewire and reprogramme a nuclear
reactor control system, one that he's never ever seen before?
With limited sight.
Post by Agamemnon
Moffat is totally out of his mind.
That is Moffat.
Post by Agamemnon
What was the point of parodying the Star Trek, "Space - the Final
Frontier" voice over only for Capaldi to make a complete and utter fool
of himself doing it?
He diverge from the Kirk line.
Post by Agamemnon
Once again a bunch morons are sent out into space, on a mining ship,
without any training and no clue whatsoever how to do anything in
accordance with health and safety regulations which look to be totally
non-existent in any case.
You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when lecturing about
what happens if someone is exposed to empty space without a suit and
then it turning out that he's lecturing about the wrong subject. Totally
amateurish foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at the start.
Rather than write a proper relationship letting it progress and then
killing of the he has her say 'I want to have your children' to the man
and then she's killed off. Terrible writing. Absolutely terrible. Why
should I give a damn about either of them when the writer hasn't
properly introduced their characters to the audience and built them up
in advance? The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script
is in completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks everyone
watching can read his mind and connect the missing back story in between
the lines.
How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees without any
consequences? This series is a complete and utter joke.
Never seen Star Cops I see.
Post by Agamemnon
Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a pantomime with
loony left politically motivated script writing plummeting to the depths
of the Sylvester McCoy era and even lower still.
If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next 8
episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.
Are you Jonathan Powell in disguise?
Post by Agamemnon
6/10 for entertainment
It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a 'plot' became
impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed to have exchanged space
suits with Bill and been blinded, none of which was actually shown.
1/10 for scriptwriting
Complete and utter garbage.
How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you are wearing
a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being used when their were on
the ship.
Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for the air
you need to breath and do your job properly?
Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily find on
the planet instead of gold or platinum?
Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill the people
wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?
A total f*ing utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Agamemnon
2017-05-13 22:51:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
Were you paying attention?
Yes. Unfortunately there wasn't much to pay attention to.
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The Doctor is blinded and he's able to rewire and reprogramme a nuclear
reactor control system, one that he's never ever seen before?
With limited sight.
Completely blind. All of which contradicts "42" where he was directly
exposed to all the light of a sentient star at full strength and he
survived unscathed.
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Moffat is totally out of his mind.
That is Moffat.
Post by Agamemnon
What was the point of parodying the Star Trek, "Space - the Final
Frontier" voice over only for Capaldi to make a complete and utter fool
of himself doing it?
He diverge from the Kirk line.
And made a complete fool of himself and turned the entire series into a
parody. (Which if course is why Moffat will not be sued by the Gene
Roddenberry estate.)
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Once again a bunch morons are sent out into space, on a mining ship,
without any training and no clue whatsoever how to do anything in
accordance with health and safety regulations which look to be totally
non-existent in any case.
You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when lecturing about
what happens if someone is exposed to empty space without a suit and
then it turning out that he's lecturing about the wrong subject. Totally
amateurish foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at the start.
Rather than write a proper relationship letting it progress and then
killing of the he has her say 'I want to have your children' to the man
and then she's killed off. Terrible writing. Absolutely terrible. Why
should I give a damn about either of them when the writer hasn't
properly introduced their characters to the audience and built them up
in advance? The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script
is in completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks everyone
watching can read his mind and connect the missing back story in between
the lines.
How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees without any
consequences? This series is a complete and utter joke.
Never seen Star Cops I see.
Star Cops was never as bad as this.
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a pantomime with
loony left politically motivated script writing plummeting to the depths
of the Sylvester McCoy era and even lower still.
If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next 8
episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.
Are you Jonathan Powell in disguise?
No.
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
6/10 for entertainment
It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a 'plot' became
impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed to have exchanged space
suits with Bill and been blinded, none of which was actually shown.
1/10 for scriptwriting
Complete and utter garbage.
How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you are wearing
a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being used when their were on
the ship.
Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for the air
you need to breath and do your job properly?
Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily find on
the planet instead of gold or platinum?
Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill the people
wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?
A total f*ing utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
The Doctor
2017-05-13 23:02:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
Were you paying attention?
Yes. Unfortunately there wasn't much to pay attention to.
Excuse us.

Suits gone mad or programmed accordingly.

Where have you been in the last 48 hours.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The Doctor is blinded and he's able to rewire and reprogramme a nuclear
reactor control system, one that he's never ever seen before?
With limited sight.
Completely blind. All of which contradicts "42" where he was directly
exposed to all the light of a sentient star at full strength and he
survived unscathed.
I will buy that.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Moffat is totally out of his mind.
That is Moffat.
Post by Agamemnon
What was the point of parodying the Star Trek, "Space - the Final
Frontier" voice over only for Capaldi to make a complete and utter fool
of himself doing it?
He diverge from the Kirk line.
And made a complete fool of himself and turned the entire series into a
parody. (Which if course is why Moffat will not be sued by the Gene
Roddenberry estate.)
This was no Roddenbury. He said Space was out to kill humanity.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Once again a bunch morons are sent out into space, on a mining ship,
without any training and no clue whatsoever how to do anything in
accordance with health and safety regulations which look to be totally
non-existent in any case.
You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when lecturing about
what happens if someone is exposed to empty space without a suit and
then it turning out that he's lecturing about the wrong subject. Totally
amateurish foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at the start.
Rather than write a proper relationship letting it progress and then
killing of the he has her say 'I want to have your children' to the man
and then she's killed off. Terrible writing. Absolutely terrible. Why
should I give a damn about either of them when the writer hasn't
properly introduced their characters to the audience and built them up
in advance? The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script
is in completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks everyone
watching can read his mind and connect the missing back story in between
the lines.
How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees without any
consequences? This series is a complete and utter joke.
Never seen Star Cops I see.
Star Cops was never as bad as this.
Do you recall the Japanese episode?
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a pantomime with
loony left politically motivated script writing plummeting to the depths
of the Sylvester McCoy era and even lower still.
If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next 8
episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.
Are you Jonathan Powell in disguise?
No.
We have our doubts.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
6/10 for entertainment
It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a 'plot' became
impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed to have exchanged space
suits with Bill and been blinded, none of which was actually shown.
1/10 for scriptwriting
Complete and utter garbage.
How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you are wearing
a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being used when their were on
the ship.
Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for the air
you need to breath and do your job properly?
Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily find on
the planet instead of gold or platinum?
Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill the people
wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?
A total f*ing utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 00:04:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
Were you paying attention?
Yes. Unfortunately there wasn't much to pay attention to.
Excuse us.
Suits gone mad or programmed accordingly.
Anti-capitalist PC lunacy claptrap at its very worst.

Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard for health and
safety when any firm of lawyers would jump at the chance to sue them for
every last penny they posses? Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and work for
someone else. And if there isn't someone else to work for then that's a
monopoly and against the laws of free competition and therefore
equivalent to communism. So why wasn't this company being run by
communists?

Why does Nardole need a space suit when he's a robot? Why didn't he give
his suit to Bill and save the Doctor being blinded?

Why if the suits are able to do the work alone did they ever need to
bring humans onto the station. Why is it being run by complete and utter
incompetents who don't have access to fail safe mechanisms and life boat
capsules.
Post by The Doctor
Where have you been in the last 48 hours.
Where has the writer been in the last millennium? Totally clueless fool
that thinks he's writing for Red Dwarf and even then Red Dwarf wouldn't
have accepted a script as feeble as this one.
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The Doctor is blinded and he's able to rewire and reprogramme a nuclear
reactor control system, one that he's never ever seen before?
With limited sight.
Completely blind. All of which contradicts "42" where he was directly
exposed to all the light of a sentient star at full strength and he
survived unscathed.
I will buy that.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Moffat is totally out of his mind.
That is Moffat.
Post by Agamemnon
What was the point of parodying the Star Trek, "Space - the Final
Frontier" voice over only for Capaldi to make a complete and utter fool
of himself doing it?
He diverge from the Kirk line.
And made a complete fool of himself and turned the entire series into a
parody. (Which if course is why Moffat will not be sued by the Gene
Roddenberry estate.)
This was no Roddenbury. He said Space was out to kill humanity.
Complete lunacy.

Doctor Who is not a sit-com.
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Once again a bunch morons are sent out into space, on a mining ship,
without any training and no clue whatsoever how to do anything in
accordance with health and safety regulations which look to be totally
non-existent in any case.
You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when lecturing about
what happens if someone is exposed to empty space without a suit and
then it turning out that he's lecturing about the wrong subject. Totally
amateurish foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at the start.
Rather than write a proper relationship letting it progress and then
killing of the he has her say 'I want to have your children' to the man
and then she's killed off. Terrible writing. Absolutely terrible. Why
should I give a damn about either of them when the writer hasn't
properly introduced their characters to the audience and built them up
in advance? The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script
is in completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks everyone
watching can read his mind and connect the missing back story in between
the lines.
How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees without any
consequences? This series is a complete and utter joke.
Never seen Star Cops I see.
Star Cops was never as bad as this.
Do you recall the Japanese episode?
Remind me.
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a pantomime with
loony left politically motivated script writing plummeting to the depths
of the Sylvester McCoy era and even lower still.
If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next 8
episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.
Are you Jonathan Powell in disguise?
No.
We have our doubts.
Who is we?
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
6/10 for entertainment
It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a 'plot' became
impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed to have exchanged space
suits with Bill and been blinded, none of which was actually shown.
1/10 for scriptwriting
Complete and utter garbage.
How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you are wearing
a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being used when their were on
the ship.
Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for the air
you need to breath and do your job properly?
Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily find on
the planet instead of gold or platinum?
Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill the people
wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?
A total f*ing utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 00:36:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
Were you paying attention?
Yes. Unfortunately there wasn't much to pay attention to.
Excuse us.
Suits gone mad or programmed accordingly.
Anti-capitalist PC lunacy claptrap at its very worst.
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard for health and
safety when any firm of lawyers would jump at the chance to sue them for
every last penny they posses? Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and work for
someone else. And if there isn't someone else to work for then that's a
monopoly and against the laws of free competition and therefore
equivalent to communism. So why wasn't this company being run by
communists?
Like Corbyn?
Post by Agamemnon
Why does Nardole need a space suit when he's a robot? Why didn't he give
his suit to Bill and save the Doctor being blinded?
Key word, IF.
Post by Agamemnon
Why if the suits are able to do the work alone did they ever need to
bring humans onto the station. Why is it being run by complete and utter
incompetents who don't have access to fail safe mechanisms and life boat
capsules.
Depends who did the training.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Where have you been in the last 48 hours.
Where has the writer been in the last millennium? Totally clueless fool
that thinks he's writing for Red Dwarf and even then Red Dwarf wouldn't
have accepted a script as feeble as this one.
And yet the NHS was brought down by ransomware.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The Doctor is blinded and he's able to rewire and reprogramme a nuclear
reactor control system, one that he's never ever seen before?
With limited sight.
Completely blind. All of which contradicts "42" where he was directly
exposed to all the light of a sentient star at full strength and he
survived unscathed.
I will buy that.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Moffat is totally out of his mind.
That is Moffat.
Post by Agamemnon
What was the point of parodying the Star Trek, "Space - the Final
Frontier" voice over only for Capaldi to make a complete and utter fool
of himself doing it?
He diverge from the Kirk line.
And made a complete fool of himself and turned the entire series into a
parody. (Which if course is why Moffat will not be sued by the Gene
Roddenberry estate.)
This was no Roddenbury. He said Space was out to kill humanity.
Complete lunacy.
Doctor Who is not a sit-com.
It do not see a sitcom.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Once again a bunch morons are sent out into space, on a mining ship,
without any training and no clue whatsoever how to do anything in
accordance with health and safety regulations which look to be totally
non-existent in any case.
You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when lecturing about
what happens if someone is exposed to empty space without a suit and
then it turning out that he's lecturing about the wrong subject. Totally
amateurish foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at the start.
Rather than write a proper relationship letting it progress and then
killing of the he has her say 'I want to have your children' to the man
and then she's killed off. Terrible writing. Absolutely terrible. Why
should I give a damn about either of them when the writer hasn't
properly introduced their characters to the audience and built them up
in advance? The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script
is in completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks everyone
watching can read his mind and connect the missing back story in between
the lines.
How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees without any
consequences? This series is a complete and utter joke.
Never seen Star Cops I see.
Star Cops was never as bad as this.
Do you recall the Japanese episode?
Remind me.
The one where there is a dead crew.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a pantomime with
loony left politically motivated script writing plummeting to the depths
of the Sylvester McCoy era and even lower still.
If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next 8
episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.
Are you Jonathan Powell in disguise?
No.
We have our doubts.
Who is we?
This is a seond poster questioning your reviews.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
6/10 for entertainment
It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a 'plot' became
impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed to have exchanged space
suits with Bill and been blinded, none of which was actually shown.
1/10 for scriptwriting
Complete and utter garbage.
How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you are wearing
a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being used when their were on
the ship.
Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for the air
you need to breath and do your job properly?
Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily find on
the planet instead of gold or platinum?
Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill the people
wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?
A total f*ing utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 01:18:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
Were you paying attention?
Yes. Unfortunately there wasn't much to pay attention to.
Excuse us.
Suits gone mad or programmed accordingly.
Anti-capitalist PC lunacy claptrap at its very worst.
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard for health and
safety when any firm of lawyers would jump at the chance to sue them for
every last penny they posses? Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and work for
someone else. And if there isn't someone else to work for then that's a
monopoly and against the laws of free competition and therefore
equivalent to communism. So why wasn't this company being run by
communists?
Like Corbyn?
Is he one of Putin's cronies too?
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Why does Nardole need a space suit when he's a robot? Why didn't he give
his suit to Bill and save the Doctor being blinded?
Key word, IF.
The said himself in the episode that he was an android and had a
completely different face and his girlfriend was the stations AI.

Though to all intents and purposes Bill is the tin dog of this series.
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Why if the suits are able to do the work alone did they ever need to
bring humans onto the station. Why is it being run by complete and utter
incompetents who don't have access to fail safe mechanisms and life boat
capsules.
Depends who did the training.
Whoever did the training, if there was any, none of these morons could
have possibly passed the certification tests or exams.
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Where have you been in the last 48 hours.
Where has the writer been in the last millennium? Totally clueless fool
that thinks he's writing for Red Dwarf and even then Red Dwarf wouldn't
have accepted a script as feeble as this one.
And yet the NHS was brought down by ransomware.
And was it written by a blind man? I doubt it. It seems to have
originated from the CIAs tool box.
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The Doctor is blinded and he's able to rewire and reprogramme a nuclear
reactor control system, one that he's never ever seen before?
With limited sight.
Completely blind. All of which contradicts "42" where he was directly
exposed to all the light of a sentient star at full strength and he
survived unscathed.
I will buy that.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Moffat is totally out of his mind.
That is Moffat.
Post by Agamemnon
What was the point of parodying the Star Trek, "Space - the Final
Frontier" voice over only for Capaldi to make a complete and utter fool
of himself doing it?
He diverge from the Kirk line.
And made a complete fool of himself and turned the entire series into a
parody. (Which if course is why Moffat will not be sued by the Gene
Roddenberry estate.)
This was no Roddenbury. He said Space was out to kill humanity.
Complete lunacy.
Doctor Who is not a sit-com.
It do not see a sitcom.
Then what was all that crap with the Doctor drawing a skull on the black
board? Has any student actually passed any of his courses?
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Once again a bunch morons are sent out into space, on a mining ship,
without any training and no clue whatsoever how to do anything in
accordance with health and safety regulations which look to be totally
non-existent in any case.
You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when lecturing about
what happens if someone is exposed to empty space without a suit and
then it turning out that he's lecturing about the wrong subject. Totally
amateurish foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at the start.
Rather than write a proper relationship letting it progress and then
killing of the he has her say 'I want to have your children' to the man
and then she's killed off. Terrible writing. Absolutely terrible. Why
should I give a damn about either of them when the writer hasn't
properly introduced their characters to the audience and built them up
in advance? The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script
is in completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks everyone
watching can read his mind and connect the missing back story in between
the lines.
How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees without any
consequences? This series is a complete and utter joke.
Never seen Star Cops I see.
Star Cops was never as bad as this.
Do you recall the Japanese episode?
Remind me.
The one where there is a dead crew.
Which one is that? Almost every episode had people dying.
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a pantomime with
loony left politically motivated script writing plummeting to the depths
of the Sylvester McCoy era and even lower still.
If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next 8
episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.
Are you Jonathan Powell in disguise?
No.
We have our doubts.
Who is we?
This is a seond poster questioning your reviews.
Who? Did you speak with him?
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
6/10 for entertainment
It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a 'plot' became
impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed to have exchanged space
suits with Bill and been blinded, none of which was actually shown.
1/10 for scriptwriting
Complete and utter garbage.
How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you are wearing
a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being used when their were on
the ship.
Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for the air
you need to breath and do your job properly?
Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily find on
the planet instead of gold or platinum?
Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill the people
wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?
A total f*ing utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 12:17:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
Were you paying attention?
Yes. Unfortunately there wasn't much to pay attention to.
Excuse us.
Suits gone mad or programmed accordingly.
Anti-capitalist PC lunacy claptrap at its very worst.
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard for health and
safety when any firm of lawyers would jump at the chance to sue them for
every last penny they posses? Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and work for
someone else. And if there isn't someone else to work for then that's a
monopoly and against the laws of free competition and therefore
equivalent to communism. So why wasn't this company being run by
communists?
Like Corbyn?
Is he one of Putin's cronies too?
Yes, hence why I would not consider him for leader.

Then there is Theresa May the 2nd comfing of Margaret Thatcher.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Why does Nardole need a space suit when he's a robot? Why didn't he give
his suit to Bill and save the Doctor being blinded?
Key word, IF.
The said himself in the episode that he was an android and had a
completely different face and his girlfriend was the stations AI.
Though to all intents and purposes Bill is the tin dog of this series.
She is no K-9.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Why if the suits are able to do the work alone did they ever need to
bring humans onto the station. Why is it being run by complete and utter
incompetents who don't have access to fail safe mechanisms and life boat
capsules.
Depends who did the training.
Whoever did the training, if there was any, none of these morons could
have possibly passed the certification tests or exams.
Are you calling them miners in space?
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Where have you been in the last 48 hours.
Where has the writer been in the last millennium? Totally clueless fool
that thinks he's writing for Red Dwarf and even then Red Dwarf wouldn't
have accepted a script as feeble as this one.
And yet the NHS was brought down by ransomware.
And was it written by a blind man? I doubt it. It seems to have
originated from the CIAs tool box.
And the 'bug' in the space suit?
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The Doctor is blinded and he's able to rewire and reprogramme a nuclear
reactor control system, one that he's never ever seen before?
With limited sight.
Completely blind. All of which contradicts "42" where he was directly
exposed to all the light of a sentient star at full strength and he
survived unscathed.
I will buy that.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Moffat is totally out of his mind.
That is Moffat.
Post by Agamemnon
What was the point of parodying the Star Trek, "Space - the Final
Frontier" voice over only for Capaldi to make a complete and utter fool
of himself doing it?
He diverge from the Kirk line.
And made a complete fool of himself and turned the entire series into a
parody. (Which if course is why Moffat will not be sued by the Gene
Roddenberry estate.)
This was no Roddenbury. He said Space was out to kill humanity.
Complete lunacy.
Doctor Who is not a sit-com.
It do not see a sitcom.
Then what was all that crap with the Doctor drawing a skull on the black
board? Has any student actually passed any of his courses?
We do not know yet. Still the Tutors are the real educators.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Once again a bunch morons are sent out into space, on a mining ship,
without any training and no clue whatsoever how to do anything in
accordance with health and safety regulations which look to be totally
non-existent in any case.
You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when lecturing about
what happens if someone is exposed to empty space without a suit and
then it turning out that he's lecturing about the wrong subject. Totally
amateurish foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at the start.
Rather than write a proper relationship letting it progress and then
killing of the he has her say 'I want to have your children' to the man
and then she's killed off. Terrible writing. Absolutely terrible. Why
should I give a damn about either of them when the writer hasn't
properly introduced their characters to the audience and built them up
in advance? The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script
is in completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks everyone
watching can read his mind and connect the missing back story in between
the lines.
How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees without any
consequences? This series is a complete and utter joke.
Never seen Star Cops I see.
Star Cops was never as bad as this.
Do you recall the Japanese episode?
Remind me.
The one where there is a dead crew.
Which one is that? Almost every episode had people dying.
I will recall the named. But the one where Spring catches a Japanese CEO
in the act.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a pantomime with
loony left politically motivated script writing plummeting to the depths
of the Sylvester McCoy era and even lower still.
If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next 8
episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.
Are you Jonathan Powell in disguise?
No.
We have our doubts.
Who is we?
This is a seond poster questioning your reviews.
Who? Did you speak with him?
Andrew
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
6/10 for entertainment
It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a 'plot' became
impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed to have exchanged space
suits with Bill and been blinded, none of which was actually shown.
1/10 for scriptwriting
Complete and utter garbage.
How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you are wearing
a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being used when their were on
the ship.
Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for the air
you need to breath and do your job properly?
Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily find on
the planet instead of gold or platinum?
Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill the people
wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?
A total f*ing utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
See you in IMDB.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Tim Bruening
2017-05-14 03:44:52 UTC
Permalink
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

The space station crew had done a really poor job copper mining, so their employers decided to kill them off and bring in a fresh, hopefully more productive crew!

To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits, and makes the workers buy it!

Nit: Unauthorized oxygen in the station gets dumped, to force the workers to buy more. But this would waste oxygen, and force the company to buy more oxygen itself!

I surmise that all the labor unions must have been eliminated! Labor unions have been in the decline for the past several decades, since Reagan's time. President Trump must have completed the process.

The corporations must have a stranglehold on the media to keep their antics from becoming public.

According to the Doctor, 6 months after the space station incident, a revolt eliminated corporate dominance of space. Evidently, the survivors did succeed in publicizing the incident!
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 04:04:11 UTC
Permalink
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper mining, so
their employers decided to kill them off and bring in a fresh,
hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits, and makes the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more and the
workers will want higher wages in order to pay for the oxygen otherwise
they will work for a different employer? Are they slaves?
Nit: Unauthorized oxygen in the station gets dumped, to force the
workers to buy more. But this would waste oxygen, and force the
company to buy more oxygen itself!
Exactly. The script was written by a complete fucking moron.
I surmise that all the labor unions must have been eliminated! Labor
Obviously along with all health and safety laws and law enforcement
agencies, the free press, lawyers, and politicians. Sounds like
Communism to me not capitalism.
unions have been in the decline for the past several decades, since
Reagan's time. President Trump must have completed the process.
The corporations must have a stranglehold on the media to keep their
antics from becoming public.
According to the Doctor, 6 months after the space station incident, a
revolt eliminated corporate dominance of space. Evidently, the
survivors did succeed in publicizing the incident!
Writing a story about the revolt would have been more interesting to
watch than this pile of moronic crap.
Tim Bruening
2017-05-14 09:52:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper mining, so
their employers decided to kill them off and bring in a fresh,
hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits, and makes
the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more and the
workers will want higher wages in order to pay for the oxygen otherwise
they will work for a different employer? Are they slaves?
Apparently so.

If the workers go out on strike, the company will refuse them oxygen or even order their spacesuits to kill them, then send in a fresh crew.
Post by Agamemnon
Nit: Unauthorized oxygen in the station gets dumped, to force the
workers to buy more. But this would waste oxygen, and force the
company to buy more oxygen itself!
Exactly. The script was written by a complete fucking moron.
I surmise that all the labor unions must have been eliminated! Labor
Obviously along with all health and safety laws and law enforcement
agencies, the free press, lawyers, and politicians. Sounds like
Communism to me not capitalism.
19th century capitalism, before the workers got organized.
Post by Agamemnon
unions have been in the decline for the past several decades, since
Reagan's time. President Trump must have completed the process.
The corporations must have a stranglehold on the media to keep their
antics from becoming public.
According to the Doctor, 6 months after the space station incident, a
revolt eliminated corporate dominance of space. Evidently, the
survivors did succeed in publicizing the incident!
Writing a story about the revolt would have been more interesting to
watch than this pile of moronic crap.
But first, the writers would have had to set the stage for the revolt, which they have now done with this episode!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 12:27:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper mining, so
their employers decided to kill them off and bring in a fresh,
hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits, and makes
the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more and the
workers will want higher wages in order to pay for the oxygen otherwise
they will work for a different employer? Are they slaves?
Apparently so.
If the workers go out on strike, the company will refuse them oxygen or
even order their spacesuits to kill them, then send in a fresh crew.
Post by Agamemnon
Nit: Unauthorized oxygen in the station gets dumped, to force the
workers to buy more. But this would waste oxygen, and force the
company to buy more oxygen itself!
Exactly. The script was written by a complete fucking moron.
I surmise that all the labor unions must have been eliminated! Labor
Obviously along with all health and safety laws and law enforcement
agencies, the free press, lawyers, and politicians. Sounds like
Communism to me not capitalism.
19th century capitalism, before the workers got organized.
Post by Agamemnon
unions have been in the decline for the past several decades, since
Reagan's time. President Trump must have completed the process.
The corporations must have a stranglehold on the media to keep their
antics from becoming public.
According to the Doctor, 6 months after the space station incident, a
revolt eliminated corporate dominance of space. Evidently, the
survivors did succeed in publicizing the incident!
Writing a story about the revolt would have been more interesting to
watch than this pile of moronic crap.
But first, the writers would have had to set the stage for the revolt,
which they have now done with this episode!
TB does get it!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 16:33:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper mining, so
their employers decided to kill them off and bring in a fresh,
hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits, and makes
the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more and the
workers will want higher wages in order to pay for the oxygen otherwise
they will work for a different employer? Are they slaves?
Apparently so.
If the workers go out on strike, the company will refuse them oxygen or even order their spacesuits to kill them, then send in a fresh crew.
That's murder.

If murder is legal in this fantasy land then the workers can just murder
their bosses and take their places. Nobody would choose to work for an
outfit like this.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Nit: Unauthorized oxygen in the station gets dumped, to force the
workers to buy more. But this would waste oxygen, and force the
company to buy more oxygen itself!
Exactly. The script was written by a complete fucking moron.
I surmise that all the labor unions must have been eliminated! Labor
Obviously along with all health and safety laws and law enforcement
agencies, the free press, lawyers, and politicians. Sounds like
Communism to me not capitalism.
19th century capitalism, before the workers got organized.
It's not capitalism in any way. It's doesn't even come close to
feudalism. The only thing that comes close to it is the Japanese forcing
prisoners of war into labour camps until they dropped dead.

Were these people workers or prisoners of war?
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
unions have been in the decline for the past several decades, since
Reagan's time. President Trump must have completed the process.
The corporations must have a stranglehold on the media to keep their
antics from becoming public.
According to the Doctor, 6 months after the space station incident, a
revolt eliminated corporate dominance of space. Evidently, the
survivors did succeed in publicizing the incident!
Writing a story about the revolt would have been more interesting to
watch than this pile of moronic crap.
But first, the writers would have had to set the stage for the revolt, which they have now done with this episode!
They already did that in the first 10 minutes.
Tim Bruening
2017-05-14 17:48:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper mining, so
their employers decided to kill them off and bring in a fresh,
hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits, and makes
the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more and the
workers will want higher wages in order to pay for the oxygen otherwise
they will work for a different employer? Are they slaves?
Apparently so.
If the workers go out on strike, the company will refuse them oxygen or even order their spacesuits to kill them, then send in a fresh crew.
That's murder.
Its precisely what we saw happening last night! If the company would kill off its workers for not meeting their cooper mining quotas due to broken machinery, it would certainly kill them if they refused to work at all!
Post by Agamemnon
If murder is legal in this fantasy land then the workers can just murder
their bosses and take their places. Nobody would choose to work for an
outfit like this.
How would the workers GET at their bosses? They were way out in the asteroid belt!
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 17:59:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper
mining, so their employers decided to kill them off and bring
in a fresh, hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits,
and makes the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more and
the workers will want higher wages in order to pay for the
oxygen otherwise they will work for a different employer? Are
they slaves?
Apparently so.
If the workers go out on strike, the company will refuse them
oxygen or even order their spacesuits to kill them, then send in
a fresh crew.
That's murder.
Its precisely what we saw happening last night! If the company would
kill off its workers for not meeting their cooper mining quotas due
to broken machinery, it would certainly kill them if they refused to
work at all!
It would never be allowed to get away with it! This story is worse than
a pantomime written by a moron.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
If murder is legal in this fantasy land then the workers can just
murder their bosses and take their places. Nobody would choose to
work for an outfit like this.
How would the workers GET at their bosses? They were way out in the asteroid belt!
So you're implying that none of workers ever go back home on leave or
home at all?
Tim Bruening
2017-05-14 18:25:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper
mining, so their employers decided to kill them off and bring
in a fresh, hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits,
and makes the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more and
the workers will want higher wages in order to pay for the
oxygen otherwise they will work for a different employer? Are
they slaves?
Apparently so.
If the workers go out on strike, the company will refuse them
oxygen or even order their spacesuits to kill them, then send in
a fresh crew.
That's murder.
Its precisely what we saw happening last night! If the company would
kill off its workers for not meeting their cooper mining quotas due
to broken machinery, it would certainly kill them if they refused to
work at all!
It would never be allowed to get away with it! This story is worse than
a pantomime written by a moron.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
If murder is legal in this fantasy land then the workers can just
murder their bosses and take their places. Nobody would choose to
work for an outfit like this.
How would the workers GET at their bosses? They were way out in the asteroid belt!
So you're implying that none of workers ever go back home on leave or
home at all?
Returning home to Earth would not necessary gain them access to their bosses.

If the workers had met their quotas, I assume that their spacesuits would not have killed them, and they would have returned home unaware that their spacesuits had ever been a threat!
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 18:49:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
On Saturday, May 13, 2017 at 9:04:15 PM UTC-7, Agamemnon
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper
mining, so their employers decided to kill them off and
bring in a fresh, hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy
land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the
spacesuits, and makes the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more
and the workers will want higher wages in order to pay for
the oxygen otherwise they will work for a different
employer? Are they slaves?
Apparently so.
If the workers go out on strike, the company will refuse
them oxygen or even order their spacesuits to kill them, then
send in a fresh crew.
That's murder.
Its precisely what we saw happening last night! If the company
would kill off its workers for not meeting their cooper mining
quotas due to broken machinery, it would certainly kill them if
they refused to work at all!
It would never be allowed to get away with it! This story is worse
than a pantomime written by a moron.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
If murder is legal in this fantasy land then the workers can
just murder their bosses and take their places. Nobody would
choose to work for an outfit like this.
How would the workers GET at their bosses? They were way out in the asteroid belt!
So you're implying that none of workers ever go back home on leave
or home at all?
Returning home to Earth would not necessary gain them access to their bosses.
They seemed to be able to gain access to them easily enough according to
the Doctor.

As usual with this pile shit series everything of any major importance
plot wise is just alluded to as happening off screen. The Doctor being
blinded and the company being toppled.
Post by Tim Bruening
If the workers had met their quotas, I assume that their spacesuits
would not have killed them, and they would have returned home unaware
that their spacesuits had ever been a threat!
A ship crewed by morons who've never received any training whatsoever.
Tim Bruening
2017-05-14 19:13:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Returning home to Earth would not necessary gain them access to their bosses.
They seemed to be able to gain access to them easily enough according to
the Doctor.
The Doctor took the survivors directly to corporate HQ.
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 19:24:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Returning home to Earth would not necessary gain them access to their bosses.
They seemed to be able to gain access to them easily enough according to
the Doctor.
The Doctor took the survivors directly to corporate HQ.
So they were able to again easy access to them. No fortified bunkers
surrounded by missile systems and armed troops or anything like that.
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:57:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Returning home to Earth would not necessary gain them access to their bosses.
They seemed to be able to gain access to them easily enough according to
the Doctor.
The Doctor took the survivors directly to corporate HQ.
So they were able to again easy access to them. No fortified bunkers
surrounded by missile systems and armed troops or anything like that.
Transporation via TARDIS.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Tim Bruening
2017-05-15 01:36:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Returning home to Earth would not necessary gain them access to their bosses.
They seemed to be able to gain access to them easily enough according to
the Doctor.
The Doctor took the survivors directly to corporate HQ.
So they were able to again easy access to them. No fortified bunkers
surrounded by missile systems and armed troops or anything like that.
Under normal circumstances, the survivors would have had a much harder time. They would have had to get back to Earth by spaceship (much slower than a TARDIS), undergo debriefing, rest at their homes, then make their way to corporate HQ (probably mostly by plane), then make appointments to speak with the Board of Directors, or at least with the Human Resources Department.

The TARDIS would have been able to deliver them directly into the CEO's office!
The Doctor
2017-05-15 04:13:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Returning home to Earth would not necessary gain them access to their bosses.
They seemed to be able to gain access to them easily enough according to
the Doctor.
The Doctor took the survivors directly to corporate HQ.
So they were able to again easy access to them. No fortified bunkers
surrounded by missile systems and armed troops or anything like that.
Under normal circumstances, the survivors would have had a much harder
time. They would have had to get back to Earth by spaceship (much
slower than a TARDIS), undergo debriefing, rest at their homes, then
make their way to corporate HQ (probably mostly by plane), then make
appointments to speak with the Board of Directors, or at least with the
Human Resources Department.
The TARDIS would have been able to deliver them directly into the CEO's office!
Point well taken.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:42:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Returning home to Earth would not necessary gain them access to their bosses.
They seemed to be able to gain access to them easily enough according to
the Doctor.
The Doctor took the survivors directly to corporate HQ.
Spot on TB.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:41:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper
mining, so their employers decided to kill them off and bring
in a fresh, hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits,
and makes the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more and
the workers will want higher wages in order to pay for the
oxygen otherwise they will work for a different employer? Are
they slaves?
Apparently so.
If the workers go out on strike, the company will refuse them
oxygen or even order their spacesuits to kill them, then send in
a fresh crew.
That's murder.
Its precisely what we saw happening last night! If the company would
kill off its workers for not meeting their cooper mining quotas due
to broken machinery, it would certainly kill them if they refused to
work at all!
It would never be allowed to get away with it! This story is worse than
a pantomime written by a moron.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
If murder is legal in this fantasy land then the workers can just
murder their bosses and take their places. Nobody would choose to
work for an outfit like this.
How would the workers GET at their bosses? They were way out in the asteroid belt!
So you're implying that none of workers ever go back home on leave or
home at all?
Returning home to Earth would not necessary gain them access to their bosses.
If the workers had met their quotas, I assume that their spacesuits
would not have killed them, and they would have returned home unaware
that their spacesuits had ever been a threat!
Good observation.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Other Doctor
2017-05-14 19:55:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper
mining, so their employers decided to kill them off and bring
in a fresh, hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits,
and makes the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more and
the workers will want higher wages in order to pay for the
oxygen otherwise they will work for a different employer? Are
they slaves?
Apparently so.
If the workers go out on strike, the company will refuse them
oxygen or even order their spacesuits to kill them, then send in
a fresh crew.
That's murder.
Its precisely what we saw happening last night! If the company would
kill off its workers for not meeting their cooper mining quotas due
to broken machinery, it would certainly kill them if they refused to
work at all!
It would never be allowed to get away with it! This story is worse than
a pantomime written by a moron.
Who says it would never be allowed to get away with it? Companies have
got away with worse in the past. Who knows what they'll be able to get
away with in the future?

Your problem is you've got no imagination. And even less experience. You
have an awareness of "how things are" in the time and place you live in.
But no idea how to imagine how different things could be elsewhere/when.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
If murder is legal in this fantasy land then the workers can just
murder their bosses and take their places. Nobody would choose to
work for an outfit like this.
Yeah. Cos a couple of hundred years ago, you wouldn't find any humans
choosing to work for people who treated them like slaves. Oh yeah - you
did. They were called slaves. You know, humans who were regarded as the
legal property of another person and forced to work for them, regardless
of their working and living conditions.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
How would the workers GET at their bosses? They were way out in the asteroid belt!
So you're implying that none of workers ever go back home on leave or
home at all?
Perhaps they did. Or perhaps they didn't. It's not something that was
discussed.
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 20:59:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper
mining, so their employers decided to kill them off and bring
in a fresh, hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits,
and makes the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more and
the workers will want higher wages in order to pay for the
oxygen otherwise they will work for a different employer? Are
they slaves?
Apparently so.
If the workers go out on strike, the company will refuse them
oxygen or even order their spacesuits to kill them, then send in
a fresh crew.
That's murder.
Its precisely what we saw happening last night! If the company would
kill off its workers for not meeting their cooper mining quotas due
to broken machinery, it would certainly kill them if they refused to
work at all!
It would never be allowed to get away with it! This story is worse
than a pantomime written by a moron.
Who says it would never be allowed to get away with it? Companies have
got away with worse in the past. Who knows what they'll be able to get
away with in the future?
Get real. This was corporate murder. If in a story set in the future a
society exists in which corporate murder is commonplace and there are no
laws and no law enforcement then it is the writers duty to explain why
this is so and how to deal with it, not make stupid jokes about colored
people and parody Star Trek voice overs as if this a bad episode of Red
Dwarf.
Post by The Other Doctor
Your problem is you've got no imagination. And even less experience. You
have an awareness of "how things are" in the time and place you live in.
But no idea how to imagine how different things could be elsewhere/when.
Poppycock. This story was sentimentalist crap with no logic or
rationality whatsoever. That's what I'm complaining about. My treatment
for Series 11 consisting of 13 episodes and a Christmas special shows I
have plenty of imagination.

How the fuck can a blind man rewire and reprogramme the safety systems
of a nuclear reactor he's never seen before wearing space gloves?

Do you seriously think this story has any credibility at all? A blind
man rewiring a nuclear reactor and reprogramming it without being able
to see or feel the code, documentation or technical manuals or IDE
because his totally blind and is wearing space gloves?

Not even a nursery school pupil would come up with a story as ridiculous
and illogical as this.

This episode and the people who liked it are as stupid as the emperor
who was conned into buying an invisible suit of cloths and wearing it in
a public parade for his birthday. Do you even understand what that story
is about?

A blind man rewiring a nuclear reactor and reprogramming its safety
systems without being able to see or feel though his thick space
gloves!!!! Are you fucking crazy??????!!!!!!
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
If murder is legal in this fantasy land then the workers can just
murder their bosses and take their places. Nobody would choose to
work for an outfit like this.
Yeah. Cos a couple of hundred years ago, you wouldn't find any humans
choosing to work for people who treated them like slaves. Oh yeah - you
A couple of hundred years ago there were laws forbiding murder and
lawyers willing to prosecute.
Post by The Other Doctor
did. They were called slaves. You know, humans who were regarded as the
legal property of another person and forced to work for them, regardless
of their working and living conditions.
But this story wasn't about slaves. It was about a bunch morons sent out
into space without any training or competence to mine asteroids.

Ever story in this series so far has relied on the complete and utter
stupidity if its protagonists and the non existence of any competent
authorities.

There isn't even any characterisation of any of the supporting cast.
They're nothing more than chorus for the Doctor's comedy routine and
Bill is nothing more than the tin dog.
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
How would the workers GET at their bosses? They were way out in the asteroid belt!
So you're implying that none of workers ever go back home on leave or
home at all?
Perhaps they did. Or perhaps they didn't. It's not something that was
discussed.
And another huge failure by the writer.
The Other Doctor
2017-05-14 21:15:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper
mining, so their employers decided to kill them off and bring
in a fresh, hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits,
and makes the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more and
the workers will want higher wages in order to pay for the
oxygen otherwise they will work for a different employer? Are
they slaves?
Apparently so.
If the workers go out on strike, the company will refuse them
oxygen or even order their spacesuits to kill them, then send in
a fresh crew.
That's murder.
Its precisely what we saw happening last night! If the company would
kill off its workers for not meeting their cooper mining quotas due
to broken machinery, it would certainly kill them if they refused to
work at all!
It would never be allowed to get away with it! This story is worse
than a pantomime written by a moron.
Who says it would never be allowed to get away with it? Companies have
got away with worse in the past. Who knows what they'll be able to get
away with in the future?
Get real. This was corporate murder. If in a story set in the future a
society exists in which corporate murder is commonplace and there are no
laws and no law enforcement then it is the writers duty to explain why
this is so and how to deal with it, not make stupid jokes about colored
people and parody Star Trek voice overs as if this a bad episode of Red
Dwarf.
Post by The Other Doctor
Your problem is you've got no imagination. And even less experience. You
have an awareness of "how things are" in the time and place you live in.
But no idea how to imagine how different things could be elsewhere/when.
Poppycock. This story was sentimentalist crap with no logic or
rationality whatsoever. That's what I'm complaining about. My treatment
for Series 11 consisting of 13 episodes and a Christmas special shows I
have plenty of imagination.
How the fuck can a blind man rewire and reprogramme the safety systems
of a nuclear reactor he's never seen before wearing space gloves?
Do you seriously think this story has any credibility at all? A blind
man rewiring a nuclear reactor and reprogramming it without being able
to see or feel the code, documentation or technical manuals or IDE
because his totally blind and is wearing space gloves?
Not even a nursery school pupil would come up with a story as ridiculous
and illogical as this.
This episode and the people who liked it are as stupid as the emperor
who was conned into buying an invisible suit of cloths and wearing it in
a public parade for his birthday. Do you even understand what that story
is about?
A blind man rewiring a nuclear reactor and reprogramming its safety
systems without being able to see or feel though his thick space
gloves!!!! Are you fucking crazy??????!!!!!!
An alien with 2 hearts who can regenerate when injured, and fly through
time and space in a blue box that's bigger on the inside than it is on
the outside!!!! Are you fucking crazy????!!!!!
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
If murder is legal in this fantasy land then the workers can just
murder their bosses and take their places. Nobody would choose to
work for an outfit like this.
Yeah. Cos a couple of hundred years ago, you wouldn't find any humans
choosing to work for people who treated them like slaves. Oh yeah - you
A couple of hundred years ago there were laws forbiding murder and
lawyers willing to prosecute.
And you think people who were powerful enough couldn't get away with
doing whatever they wanted? Are you completely deluded?
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
did. They were called slaves. You know, humans who were regarded as the
legal property of another person and forced to work for them, regardless
of their working and living conditions.
But this story wasn't about slaves. It was about a bunch morons sent out
into space without any training or competence to mine asteroids.
No, it was completely about slaves. Slaves to the suits. You know, all
the subtext that whooshed over your head.
Post by Agamemnon
Ever story in this series so far has relied on the complete and utter
stupidity if its protagonists and the non existence of any competent
authorities.
There isn't even any characterisation of any of the supporting cast.
They're nothing more than chorus for the Doctor's comedy routine and
Bill is nothing more than the tin dog.
I did find Bill a little on the irritating side, but she's got more
character than many previous companions. Can't see your problem with her
- she's certainly more interesting than the bland, 2-dimensional
companions of the 1960s through to the 1990s.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
How would the workers GET at their bosses? They were way out in the asteroid belt!
So you're implying that none of workers ever go back home on leave or
home at all?
Perhaps they did. Or perhaps they didn't. It's not something that was
discussed.
And another huge failure by the writer.
No, that's your failure. The writer concentrated on what was important.
He didn't go into the minutiae. He didn't show the crew eating or taking
a shit. No doubt you consider that a failure also.
Tim Bruening
2017-05-14 21:25:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
A blind man rewiring a nuclear reactor and reprogramming its safety
systems without being able to see or feel though his thick space
gloves!!!! Are you fucking crazy??????!!!!!!
An alien with 2 hearts who can regenerate when injured, and fly through
time and space in a blue box that's bigger on the inside than it is on
the outside!!!! Are you fucking crazy????!!!!!
Are you implying that blind Time Lords have a sensitive enough sense of touch to rewire nuclear reactors?

Robert Heinlein: The Green Hills Of Earth: A blind man (also the most famous poet singer of his era) shuts down a runaway nuclear reactor on a spaceship, using his sense of touch. As he dies, he sings about the Green Hills of Earth.
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 21:37:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
A blind man rewiring a nuclear reactor and reprogramming its
safety systems without being able to see or feel though his thick
space gloves!!!! Are you fucking crazy??????!!!!!!
An alien with 2 hearts who can regenerate when injured, and fly
through time and space in a blue box that's bigger on the inside
than it is on the outside!!!! Are you fucking crazy????!!!!!
Are you implying that blind Time Lords have a sensitive enough sense
of touch to rewire nuclear reactors?
You mean while wearing space gloves? How did he see the computer code he
needed to change? How did he read the documentation and technical manuals?
Post by Tim Bruening
Robert Heinlein: The Green Hills Of Earth: A blind man (also the most
famous poet singer of his era) shuts down a runaway nuclear reactor
on a spaceship, using his sense of touch. As he dies, he sings about
the Green Hills of Earth.
So that's where the moron got that idea from. Like I said these idiot
think the viewer can read their minds rather than actually bothering to
write something properly.

This isn't shutting down a nuclear reactor in any cased. Anyone can
press the off button. This is rewiring, reprogramming and bypassing the
safety systems which force a redactor to shut down, and instead making
it go critical and explode.
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 21:33:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper
mining, so their employers decided to kill them off and bring
in a fresh, hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits,
and makes the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more and
the workers will want higher wages in order to pay for the
oxygen otherwise they will work for a different employer? Are
they slaves?
Apparently so.
If the workers go out on strike, the company will refuse them
oxygen or even order their spacesuits to kill them, then send in
a fresh crew.
That's murder.
Its precisely what we saw happening last night! If the company would
kill off its workers for not meeting their cooper mining quotas due
to broken machinery, it would certainly kill them if they refused to
work at all!
It would never be allowed to get away with it! This story is worse
than a pantomime written by a moron.
Who says it would never be allowed to get away with it? Companies have
got away with worse in the past. Who knows what they'll be able to get
away with in the future?
Get real. This was corporate murder. If in a story set in the future a
society exists in which corporate murder is commonplace and there are
no laws and no law enforcement then it is the writers duty to explain
why this is so and how to deal with it, not make stupid jokes about
colored people and parody Star Trek voice overs as if this a bad
episode of Red Dwarf.
Post by The Other Doctor
Your problem is you've got no imagination. And even less experience. You
have an awareness of "how things are" in the time and place you live in.
But no idea how to imagine how different things could be elsewhere/when.
Poppycock. This story was sentimentalist crap with no logic or
rationality whatsoever. That's what I'm complaining about. My
treatment for Series 11 consisting of 13 episodes and a Christmas
special shows I have plenty of imagination.
How the fuck can a blind man rewire and reprogramme the safety systems
of a nuclear reactor he's never seen before wearing space gloves?
Do you seriously think this story has any credibility at all? A blind
man rewiring a nuclear reactor and reprogramming it without being able
to see or feel the code, documentation or technical manuals or IDE
because his totally blind and is wearing space gloves?
Not even a nursery school pupil would come up with a story as
ridiculous and illogical as this.
This episode and the people who liked it are as stupid as the emperor
who was conned into buying an invisible suit of cloths and wearing it
in a public parade for his birthday. Do you even understand what that
story is about?
A blind man rewiring a nuclear reactor and reprogramming its safety
systems without being able to see or feel though his thick space
gloves!!!! Are you fucking crazy??????!!!!!!
An alien with 2 hearts who can regenerate when injured, and fly through
time and space in a blue box that's bigger on the inside than it is on
the outside!!!! Are you fucking crazy????!!!!!
This does not provide an explanation, let alone a logical or rational one.

How can a totally blind man wearing thick space gloves rewire and
reprogramme the safety system of a nuclear reactor he can neither see or
feel?
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
If murder is legal in this fantasy land then the workers can just
murder their bosses and take their places. Nobody would choose to
work for an outfit like this.
Yeah. Cos a couple of hundred years ago, you wouldn't find any humans
choosing to work for people who treated them like slaves. Oh yeah - you
A couple of hundred years ago there were laws forbiding murder and
lawyers willing to prosecute.
And you think people who were powerful enough couldn't get away with
doing whatever they wanted? Are you completely deluded?
Let the writer first prove that these people were powerful enough like
E. E. Smith had to do when he wrote stories about corporate greed and
disregard of safety. He hasn't and he doesn't know how to even being.
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
did. They were called slaves. You know, humans who were regarded as the
legal property of another person and forced to work for them, regardless
of their working and living conditions.
But this story wasn't about slaves. It was about a bunch morons sent
out into space without any training or competence to mine asteroids.
No, it was completely about slaves. Slaves to the suits. You know, all
the subtext that whooshed over your head.
Where is the evidence that they were slaves? Who enslaved them? How were
they enslaved? What was the reason they were enslaved? Why didn't they
try to escape?

These were morons in space not salves.
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Ever story in this series so far has relied on the complete and utter
stupidity if its protagonists and the non existence of any competent
authorities.
There isn't even any characterisation of any of the supporting cast.
They're nothing more than chorus for the Doctor's comedy routine and
Bill is nothing more than the tin dog.
I did find Bill a little on the irritating side, but she's got more
character than many previous companions. Can't see your problem with her
- she's certainly more interesting than the bland, 2-dimensional
companions of the 1960s through to the 1990s.
What? There's nothing interesting about her at all. She's the Doctors
tin dog and she's got a face like a dog to prove it, so no redeeming
qualities like Mel or Ace.
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
How would the workers GET at their bosses? They were way out in the asteroid belt!
So you're implying that none of workers ever go back home on leave or
home at all?
Perhaps they did. Or perhaps they didn't. It's not something that was
discussed.
And another huge failure by the writer.
No, that's your failure. The writer concentrated on what was important.
He did nothing of the kind.

A totally blind man wearing thick space gloves rewiring and reprogramme
the safety system of a nuclear reactor he can neither see or feel?

Is he for fucking real?
Post by The Other Doctor
He didn't go into the minutiae. He didn't show the crew eating or taking
a shit. No doubt you consider that a failure also.
He didn't explained how a blind man wearing thick space gloves rewiring
and reprogramme the safety system of a nuclear reactor he can neither
see or feel let alone how he actually got blinded in the first place and
why Nardole was is a robot and therefore doesn't need to breath and can
survive the vacuum of space didn't give up his suit to Bill instead.
The Doctor
2017-05-14 23:08:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper
mining, so their employers decided to kill them off and bring
in a fresh, hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits,
and makes the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more and
the workers will want higher wages in order to pay for the
oxygen otherwise they will work for a different employer? Are
they slaves?
Apparently so.
If the workers go out on strike, the company will refuse them
oxygen or even order their spacesuits to kill them, then send in
a fresh crew.
That's murder.
Its precisely what we saw happening last night! If the company would
kill off its workers for not meeting their cooper mining quotas due
to broken machinery, it would certainly kill them if they refused to
work at all!
It would never be allowed to get away with it! This story is worse
than a pantomime written by a moron.
Who says it would never be allowed to get away with it? Companies have
got away with worse in the past. Who knows what they'll be able to get
away with in the future?
Get real. This was corporate murder. If in a story set in the future a
society exists in which corporate murder is commonplace and there are no
laws and no law enforcement then it is the writers duty to explain why
this is so and how to deal with it, not make stupid jokes about colored
people and parody Star Trek voice overs as if this a bad episode of Red
Dwarf.
Post by The Other Doctor
Your problem is you've got no imagination. And even less experience. You
have an awareness of "how things are" in the time and place you live in.
But no idea how to imagine how different things could be elsewhere/when.
Poppycock. This story was sentimentalist crap with no logic or
rationality whatsoever. That's what I'm complaining about. My treatment
for Series 11 consisting of 13 episodes and a Christmas special shows I
have plenty of imagination.
How the fuck can a blind man rewire and reprogramme the safety systems
of a nuclear reactor he's never seen before wearing space gloves?
Do you seriously think this story has any credibility at all? A blind
man rewiring a nuclear reactor and reprogramming it without being able
to see or feel the code, documentation or technical manuals or IDE
because his totally blind and is wearing space gloves?
Not even a nursery school pupil would come up with a story as ridiculous
and illogical as this.
This episode and the people who liked it are as stupid as the emperor
who was conned into buying an invisible suit of cloths and wearing it in
a public parade for his birthday. Do you even understand what that story
is about?
A blind man rewiring a nuclear reactor and reprogramming its safety
systems without being able to see or feel though his thick space
gloves!!!! Are you fucking crazy??????!!!!!!
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
If murder is legal in this fantasy land then the workers can just
murder their bosses and take their places. Nobody would choose to
work for an outfit like this.
Yeah. Cos a couple of hundred years ago, you wouldn't find any humans
choosing to work for people who treated them like slaves. Oh yeah - you
A couple of hundred years ago there were laws forbiding murder and
lawyers willing to prosecute.
Post by The Other Doctor
did. They were called slaves. You know, humans who were regarded as the
legal property of another person and forced to work for them, regardless
of their working and living conditions.
But this story wasn't about slaves. It was about a bunch morons sent out
into space without any training or competence to mine asteroids.
Ever story in this series so far has relied on the complete and utter
stupidity if its protagonists and the non existence of any competent
authorities.
There isn't even any characterisation of any of the supporting cast.
They're nothing more than chorus for the Doctor's comedy routine and
Bill is nothing more than the tin dog.
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
How would the workers GET at their bosses? They were way out in the asteroid belt!
So you're implying that none of workers ever go back home on leave or
home at all?
Perhaps they did. Or perhaps they didn't. It's not something that was
discussed.
And another huge failure by the writer.
How would you rewrite Oxygen?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Agamemnon
2017-05-15 01:17:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
So you're implying that none of workers ever go back home on leave or
home at all?
Perhaps they did. Or perhaps they didn't. It's not something that was
discussed.
And another huge failure by the writer.
How would you rewrite Oxygen?
I refer you to Virgil Samms harvesting of leaves on the planet Trenco to
make the drug Thionite in "First Lensman" by E. E. Smith, and Conway
Costigan going undercover as a uranium miner in the same story.

That's the kind of story I would have written and I would not have had
any need or use for the tin dog or Polynesia which would have made it
even better still. Though Bill could probably stand in for one of the
Zabriskan Fontenas considering her intelligence.
The Doctor
2017-05-15 04:13:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
So you're implying that none of workers ever go back home on leave or
home at all?
Perhaps they did. Or perhaps they didn't. It's not something that was
discussed.
And another huge failure by the writer.
How would you rewrite Oxygen?
I refer you to Virgil Samms harvesting of leaves on the planet Trenco to
make the drug Thionite in "First Lensman" by E. E. Smith, and Conway
Costigan going undercover as a uranium miner in the same story.
That's the kind of story I would have written and I would not have had
any need or use for the tin dog or Polynesia which would have made it
even better still. Though Bill could probably stand in for one of the
Zabriskan Fontenas considering her intelligence.
No surprise.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:33:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper
mining, so their employers decided to kill them off and bring
in a fresh, hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits,
and makes the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more and
the workers will want higher wages in order to pay for the
oxygen otherwise they will work for a different employer? Are
they slaves?
Apparently so.
If the workers go out on strike, the company will refuse them
oxygen or even order their spacesuits to kill them, then send in
a fresh crew.
That's murder.
Its precisely what we saw happening last night! If the company would
kill off its workers for not meeting their cooper mining quotas due
to broken machinery, it would certainly kill them if they refused to
work at all!
It would never be allowed to get away with it! This story is worse than
a pantomime written by a moron.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
If murder is legal in this fantasy land then the workers can just
murder their bosses and take their places. Nobody would choose to
work for an outfit like this.
How would the workers GET at their bosses? They were way out in the asteroid belt!
So you're implying that none of workers ever go back home on leave or
home at all?
No.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:29:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper mining, so
their employers decided to kill them off and bring in a fresh,
hopefully more productive crew!
Where is this moronic farce supposed to be set? Fantasy land?
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits, and makes
the workers buy it!
How is that saving them money when the suits will cost more and the
workers will want higher wages in order to pay for the oxygen otherwise
they will work for a different employer? Are they slaves?
Apparently so.
If the workers go out on strike, the company will refuse them oxygen
or even order their spacesuits to kill them, then send in a fresh crew.
Post by Agamemnon
That's murder.
Its precisely what we saw happening last night! If the company would
kill off its workers for not meeting their cooper mining quotas due to
broken machinery, it would certainly kill them if they refused to work
at all!
Post by Agamemnon
If murder is legal in this fantasy land then the workers can just murder
their bosses and take their places. Nobody would choose to work for an
outfit like this.
How would the workers GET at their bosses? They were way out in the asteroid belt!
Wherever. Point well taken.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 12:22:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
The space station crew had done a really poor job copper mining, so
their employers decided to kill them off and bring in a fresh, hopefully
more productive crew!
To save money, the company limits oxygen to the spacesuits, and makes the workers buy it!
Nit: Unauthorized oxygen in the station gets dumped, to force the
workers to buy more. But this would waste oxygen, and force the company
to buy more oxygen itself!
I surmise that all the labor unions must have been eliminated! Labor
unions have been in the decline for the past several decades, since
Reagan's time. President Trump must have completed the process.
The corporations must have a stranglehold on the media to keep their
antics from becoming public.
According to the Doctor, 6 months after the space station incident, a
revolt eliminated corporate dominance of space. Evidently, the
survivors did succeed in publicizing the incident!
Nice summary. Please a review you can post on IMDB!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Tim Bruening
2017-05-14 03:51:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard for health and
safety when any firm of lawyers would jump at the chance to sue them for
every last penny they posses?
I surmise that labor unions have been abolished and limits placed on lawyers.

Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
Post by Agamemnon
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and work for
someone else.
How can the workers change jobs if they are out in the asteroid belt?

How easily could you change your job?

And if there isn't someone else to work for then that's a
Post by Agamemnon
monopoly and against the laws of free competition and therefore
equivalent to communism. So why wasn't this company being run by
communists?
The anti-trust laws must have been eliminated along with the labor unions, lawyers, and worker safety regulations. I'm assuming that Trump played a big role in the above.

The checks and balances came about because of worker activism. They could be eliminated if the corporations become really dominant.
Post by Agamemnon
Why does Nardole need a space suit when he's a robot?
I understand that he's a cyborg, so would still need air.

Why didn't he give
Post by Agamemnon
his suit to Bill and save the Doctor being blinded?
Why if the suits are able to do the work alone did they ever need to
bring humans onto the station.
The spacesuits aren't as smart as humans.

Why is it being run by complete and utter
Post by Agamemnon
incompetents who don't have access to fail safe mechanisms and life boat
capsules.
See my paragraph above about the eliminations of unions, worker safety regs, etc.
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 04:17:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard for
health and safety when any firm of lawyers would jump at the chance
to sue them for every last penny they posses?
I surmise that labor unions have been abolished and limits placed on lawyers.
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to work for
a different company that offers better working conditions? The moron
that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue how
capitalism works.
Post by Tim Bruening
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
Post by Agamemnon
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and work for
someone else.
How can the workers change jobs if they are out in the asteroid belt?
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place,
especially one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of society
would work for an employer like that and they wouldn't tolerate being
treated like shit. They'd be out to kill their bosses at the first
opportunity and take their jobs themselves, especially since murder
seems to no longer be a crime.
Post by Tim Bruening
How easily could you change your job?
And if there isn't someone else to work for then that's a
Post by Agamemnon
monopoly and against the laws of free competition and therefore
equivalent to communism. So why wasn't this company being run by
communists?
The anti-trust laws must have been eliminated along with the labor
unions, lawyers, and worker safety regulations. I'm assuming that
Trump played a big role in the above.
Really?
Post by Tim Bruening
The checks and balances came about because of worker activism. They
could be eliminated if the corporations become really dominant.
Yer right. And murder and corporate manslaughter are no longer crimes
either. What sort of society is this? One run by the mafia? See above to
see how disrespected workers deal with their bosses in a lawless mafia
state. They don't get to live long. Read E E Smith's Lensman series.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why does Nardole need a space suit when he's a robot?
I understand that he's a cyborg, so would still need air.
He admired in this episode that we was an AI just like the one on the ship.
Post by Tim Bruening
Why didn't he give
Post by Agamemnon
his suit to Bill and save the Doctor being blinded?
Why if the suits are able to do the work alone did they ever need
to bring humans onto the station.
The spacesuits aren't as smart as humans.
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Post by Tim Bruening
Why is it being run by complete and utter
Post by Agamemnon
incompetents who don't have access to fail safe mechanisms and life
boat capsules.
See my paragraph above about the eliminations of unions, worker safety regs, etc.
What benefit does the company get by running a mining operation staffed
by complete and utter incompetents. Read the mining chapter featuring
Conway (Spud) Costigan from First Lensman and the asteroid mining
section of Gray Lensman.
Tim Bruening
2017-05-14 09:57:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard for
health and safety when any firm of lawyers would jump at the chance
to sue them for every last penny they posses?
I surmise that labor unions have been abolished and limits placed on lawyers.
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to work for
a different company that offers better working conditions?
Perhaps there is only ONE company working the asteroid mines!

If the workers tried to quit, the company would just direct the spacesuits to kill them, as per this episode!

The moron
Post by Agamemnon
that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue how
capitalism works.
They might have seen how it worked in the 19th century, then exaggerated for satiric effect.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
Post by Agamemnon
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and work for
someone else.
How can the workers change jobs if they are out in the asteroid belt?
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place,
especially one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of society
would work for an employer like that and they wouldn't tolerate being
treated like shit. They'd be out to kill their bosses at the first
opportunity and take their jobs themselves, especially since murder
seems to no longer be a crime.
How do you KNOW that the general public KNOWS about that particular employer's worker termination practices?
The Doctor
2017-05-14 12:27:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard for
health and safety when any firm of lawyers would jump at the chance
to sue them for every last penny they posses?
I surmise that labor unions have been abolished and limits placed on lawyers.
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to work for
a different company that offers better working conditions?
Perhaps there is only ONE company working the asteroid mines!
If the workers tried to quit, the company would just direct the
spacesuits to kill them, as per this episode!
The moron
Post by Agamemnon
that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue how
capitalism works.
They might have seen how it worked in the 19th century, then exaggerated for satiric effect.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
Post by Agamemnon
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and work for
someone else.
How can the workers change jobs if they are out in the asteroid belt?
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place,
especially one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of society
would work for an employer like that and they wouldn't tolerate being
treated like shit. They'd be out to kill their bosses at the first
opportunity and take their jobs themselves, especially since murder
seems to no longer be a crime.
How do you KNOW that the general public KNOWS about that particular
employer's worker termination practices?
Good points Tim!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 17:56:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard for
health and safety when any firm of lawyers would jump at the chance
to sue them for every last penny they posses?
I surmise that labor unions have been abolished and limits placed on lawyers.
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to work for
a different company that offers better working conditions?
Perhaps there is only ONE company working the asteroid mines!
If there was just one company they it would be under strict regulation
and supervision.
Post by Tim Bruening
If the workers tried to quit, the company would just direct the spacesuits to kill them, as per this episode!
No company in existence would have been allowed to sell oxygen to its
workers in space. Imagine an oil company on Earth being allowed to sell
oxygen to divers on the sea floor or in its submarines in order for them
to do their job. It is totally unthinkable.
Post by Tim Bruening
The moron
Post by Agamemnon
that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue how
capitalism works.
They might have seen how it worked in the 19th century, then exaggerated for satiric effect.
Poppycock. You'd only treat your workers like that if your were
operating illegally and they workers you employed were all fugitive
criminals who no one cared about. Do the writers on this show have any
fucking clue whatsoever? Read "First Lensman" by E E Smith which deals
with these issues properly.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
Post by Agamemnon
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and work for
someone else.
How can the workers change jobs if they are out in the asteroid belt?
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place,
especially one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of society
would work for an employer like that and they wouldn't tolerate being
treated like shit. They'd be out to kill their bosses at the first
opportunity and take their jobs themselves, especially since murder
seems to no longer be a crime.
How do you KNOW that the general public KNOWS about that particular employer's worker termination practices?
Anyone applying for a job with company would know how they operated and
refuse to work for them under these conditions. If this was a legal
company it would be regulated and have to undergo regular inspections by
the authorities including health and safety which would close it down in
an instant. Even the workers themselves would see to it that it was
closed down. See the 194- chapter in Triplanatary by E. E. Simth.
Tim Bruening
2017-05-14 18:22:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard for
health and safety when any firm of lawyers would jump at the chance
to sue them for every last penny they posses?
I surmise that labor unions have been abolished and limits placed on lawyers.
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to work for
a different company that offers better working conditions?
Perhaps there is only ONE company working the asteroid mines!
If there was just one company they it would be under strict regulation
and supervision.
Not if its very politically powerful, and thus can bribe the regulators!
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
If the workers tried to quit, the company would just direct the spacesuits to kill them, as per this episode!
No company in existence would have been allowed to sell oxygen to its
workers in space. Imagine an oil company on Earth being allowed to sell
oxygen to divers on the sea floor or in its submarines in order for them
to do their job. It is totally unthinkable.
I have read SF novels in which people have to buy air, such as Robert Heinlein's "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress".
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
The moron
Post by Agamemnon
that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue how
capitalism works.
They might have seen how it worked in the 19th century, then exaggerated for satiric effect.
Poppycock. You'd only treat your workers like that if your were
operating illegally and they workers you employed were all fugitive
criminals who no one cared about.
Maybe the company WAS operating illegally, and had bribed Earth's governments to ignore their violations of worker safety regs.

Do the writers on this show have any
Post by Agamemnon
fucking clue whatsoever? Read "First Lensman" by E E Smith which deals
with these issues properly.
Is that story part of the Doctor Who canon? If not, its irrelevant to this discussion.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
Post by Agamemnon
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and work for
someone else.
How can the workers change jobs if they are out in the asteroid belt?
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place,
especially one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of society
would work for an employer like that and they wouldn't tolerate being
treated like shit. They'd be out to kill their bosses at the first
opportunity and take their jobs themselves, especially since murder
seems to no longer be a crime.
How do you KNOW that the general public KNOWS about that particular employer's worker termination practices?
Anyone applying for a job with company would know how they operated and
refuse to work for them under these conditions.
HOW would the workers know that the company will execute them if they fail to make quota? Who's forcing the company to tell them?

If this was a legal
Post by Agamemnon
company it would be regulated and have to undergo regular inspections by
the authorities including health and safety which would close it down in
an instant.
I am assuming that worker safety regulations have been greatly weakened and/or the regulatory agencies are toothless. Right now, Trump is attempting to weaken regulations right and left.

Even the workers themselves would see to it that it was
Post by Agamemnon
closed down. See the 194- chapter in Triplanatary by E. E. Simth.
Is it canonical that the events in "Triplanetary" are part of the Doctor Who Universe? If so, please cite your sources. If not, why would that story be relevant to the current discussions of employer/employee relations in space?
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 20:00:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
On Saturday, May 13, 2017 at 5:04:14 PM UTC-7, Agamemnon
Post by Agamemnon
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard
for health and safety when any firm of lawyers would jump
at the chance to sue them for every last penny they
posses?
I surmise that labor unions have been abolished and limits
placed on lawyers.
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to
work for a different company that offers better working
conditions?
Perhaps there is only ONE company working the asteroid mines!
If there was just one company they it would be under strict
regulation and supervision.
Not if its very politically powerful, and thus can bribe the
regulators!
To allow it to murder people? It would have to bribe the regulators, the
police and the press barons to do that. It would also have to murder
anyone trying to investigate its practices and almost all of it's
employees. That would have been a far better story than the crap we were
given. "Masters of the Vortex" and "First Lensman" by E. E. Smith show
how to do that kind of story properly.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
If the workers tried to quit, the company would just direct the
spacesuits to kill them, as per this episode!
No company in existence would have been allowed to sell oxygen to
its workers in space. Imagine an oil company on Earth being allowed
to sell oxygen to divers on the sea floor or in its submarines in
order for them to do their job. It is totally unthinkable.
I have read SF novels in which people have to buy air, such as Robert
Heinlein's "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress".
Unfortunately this story had no credibility whatsoever since it failed
to deal with the issue of having to buy air, the background political
situation and why it needed to be bought by workers in the first place
properly. Instead all there was was sentimentalist bollocks and a blind
man rewiring and reprogramming the safety systems of a nuclear reactor
which is when it because totally ridiculous and beyond reason.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
The moron
Post by Agamemnon
that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue how
capitalism works.
They might have seen how it worked in the 19th century, then
exaggerated for satiric effect.
Poppycock. You'd only treat your workers like that if your were
operating illegally and they workers you employed were all fugitive
criminals who no one cared about.
Maybe the company WAS operating illegally, and had bribed Earth's
governments to ignore their violations of worker safety regs.
So why didn't the story delve into this then?
Post by Tim Bruening
Do the writers on this show have any
Post by Agamemnon
fucking clue whatsoever? Read "First Lensman" by E E Smith which
deals with these issues properly.
Is that story part of the Doctor Who canon? If not, its irrelevant to this discussion.
Poppycock. It shows you how to address those kinds of issue properly.
Besides which it became Doctor Who canon along with the entire Lensman
series after my S11 Christmas Special, The Manifestation.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
Post by Agamemnon
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and
work for someone else.
How can the workers change jobs if they are out in the
asteroid belt?
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place,
especially one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of
society would work for an employer like that and they wouldn't
tolerate being treated like shit. They'd be out to kill their
bosses at the first opportunity and take their jobs themselves,
especially since murder seems to no longer be a crime.
How do you KNOW that the general public KNOWS about that
particular employer's worker termination practices?
Anyone applying for a job with company would know how they operated
and refuse to work for them under these conditions.
HOW would the workers know that the company will execute them if they
fail to make quota? Who's forcing the company to tell them?
Don't these people have families that care about them and would demand
to know what happened to them? Why happened to the previous workers? Did
they ever get back home?
Post by Tim Bruening
If this was a legal
Post by Agamemnon
company it would be regulated and have to undergo regular
inspections by the authorities including health and safety which
would close it down in an instant.
I am assuming that worker safety regulations have been greatly
weakened and/or the regulatory agencies are toothless. Right now,
Trump is attempting to weaken regulations right and left.
To allow corporation to deliberately murder their workers? You must be
joking.
Post by Tim Bruening
Even the workers themselves would see to it that it was
Post by Agamemnon
closed down. See the 194- chapter in Triplanatary by E. E. Simth.
Is it canonical that the events in "Triplanetary" are part of the
Doctor Who Universe? If so, please cite your sources. If not, why
Triplanetary became canonical when my S11 Christmas Special was based on
it.
Post by Tim Bruening
would that story be relevant to the current discussions of
employer/employee relations in space?
Because it's about employer employee relations as is First Lensman which
is about employer employee relations in space. And if you want to know
about asteroid mining and one of the main protagonists being blinded and
how to foreshadow and deal with it in a credible manner by giving the
character an extra sense of 'perception' then read Gray Lensman.

The writer who wrote Oxygen is a complete and utter fool who put all the
emphasis in the wrong place and things that the viewer has read
something similar that he's tried to copy and based his story on, and
will therefore fill in the gaps that he hasn't dealt for him. It's just
like Yads and his incoherent plot synopses and oblique references to
passed episodes that nobody can understand unless they've actually seen
the episode which is not how you write a plot synopsis.
The Doctor
2017-05-14 23:03:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
On Saturday, May 13, 2017 at 5:04:14 PM UTC-7, Agamemnon
Post by Agamemnon
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard
for health and safety when any firm of lawyers would jump
at the chance to sue them for every last penny they
posses?
I surmise that labor unions have been abolished and limits placed on lawyers.
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to
work for a different company that offers better working
conditions?
Perhaps there is only ONE company working the asteroid mines!
If there was just one company they it would be under strict
regulation and supervision.
Not if its very politically powerful, and thus can bribe the
regulators!
To allow it to murder people? It would have to bribe the regulators, the
police and the press barons to do that. It would also have to murder
anyone trying to investigate its practices and almost all of it's
employees. That would have been a far better story than the crap we were
given. "Masters of the Vortex" and "First Lensman" by E. E. Smith show
how to do that kind of story properly.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
If the workers tried to quit, the company would just direct the
spacesuits to kill them, as per this episode!
No company in existence would have been allowed to sell oxygen to
its workers in space. Imagine an oil company on Earth being allowed
to sell oxygen to divers on the sea floor or in its submarines in
order for them to do their job. It is totally unthinkable.
I have read SF novels in which people have to buy air, such as Robert
Heinlein's "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress".
Unfortunately this story had no credibility whatsoever since it failed
to deal with the issue of having to buy air, the background political
situation and why it needed to be bought by workers in the first place
properly. Instead all there was was sentimentalist bollocks and a blind
man rewiring and reprogramming the safety systems of a nuclear reactor
which is when it because totally ridiculous and beyond reason.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
The moron
Post by Agamemnon
that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue how
capitalism works.
They might have seen how it worked in the 19th century, then
exaggerated for satiric effect.
Poppycock. You'd only treat your workers like that if your were
operating illegally and they workers you employed were all fugitive
criminals who no one cared about.
Maybe the company WAS operating illegally, and had bribed Earth's
governments to ignore their violations of worker safety regs.
So why didn't the story delve into this then?
Post by Tim Bruening
Do the writers on this show have any
Post by Agamemnon
fucking clue whatsoever? Read "First Lensman" by E E Smith which
deals with these issues properly.
Is that story part of the Doctor Who canon? If not, its irrelevant to this discussion.
Poppycock. It shows you how to address those kinds of issue properly.
Besides which it became Doctor Who canon along with the entire Lensman
series after my S11 Christmas Special, The Manifestation.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
Post by Agamemnon
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and
work for someone else.
How can the workers change jobs if they are out in the
asteroid belt?
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place,
especially one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of
society would work for an employer like that and they wouldn't
tolerate being treated like shit. They'd be out to kill their
bosses at the first opportunity and take their jobs themselves,
especially since murder seems to no longer be a crime.
How do you KNOW that the general public KNOWS about that
particular employer's worker termination practices?
Anyone applying for a job with company would know how they operated
and refuse to work for them under these conditions.
HOW would the workers know that the company will execute them if they
fail to make quota? Who's forcing the company to tell them?
Don't these people have families that care about them and would demand
to know what happened to them? Why happened to the previous workers? Did
they ever get back home?
Post by Tim Bruening
If this was a legal
Post by Agamemnon
company it would be regulated and have to undergo regular
inspections by the authorities including health and safety which
would close it down in an instant.
I am assuming that worker safety regulations have been greatly
weakened and/or the regulatory agencies are toothless. Right now,
Trump is attempting to weaken regulations right and left.
To allow corporation to deliberately murder their workers? You must be
joking.
Post by Tim Bruening
Even the workers themselves would see to it that it was
Post by Agamemnon
closed down. See the 194- chapter in Triplanatary by E. E. Simth.
Is it canonical that the events in "Triplanetary" are part of the
Doctor Who Universe? If so, please cite your sources. If not, why
Triplanetary became canonical when my S11 Christmas Special was based on
it.
Post by Tim Bruening
would that story be relevant to the current discussions of
employer/employee relations in space?
Because it's about employer employee relations as is First Lensman which
is about employer employee relations in space. And if you want to know
about asteroid mining and one of the main protagonists being blinded and
how to foreshadow and deal with it in a credible manner by giving the
character an extra sense of 'perception' then read Gray Lensman.
The writer who wrote Oxygen is a complete and utter fool who put all the
emphasis in the wrong place and things that the viewer has read
something similar that he's tried to copy and based his story on, and
will therefore fill in the gaps that he hasn't dealt for him. It's just
like Yads and his incoherent plot synopses and oblique references to
passed episodes that nobody can understand unless they've actually seen
the episode which is not how you write a plot synopsis.
I see I am going my job corectly!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Tim Bruening
2017-05-15 01:55:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
On Saturday, May 13, 2017 at 5:04:14 PM UTC-7, Agamemnon
Post by Agamemnon
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard
for health and safety when any firm of lawyers would jump
at the chance to sue them for every last penny they
posses?
I surmise that labor unions have been abolished and limits placed on lawyers.
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to
work for a different company that offers better working
conditions?
Perhaps there is only ONE company working the asteroid mines!
If there was just one company they it would be under strict
regulation and supervision.
Not if its very politically powerful, and thus can bribe the
regulators!
To allow it to murder people? It would have to bribe the regulators, the
police and the press barons to do that.
That's one of the things I suggested: Bribing the regulators and cops. I'm sorry I forgot to bribe the news media. Thanks for adding that in.


It would also have to murder
Post by Agamemnon
anyone trying to investigate its practices and almost all of it's
employees. That would have been a far better story than the crap we were
given. "Masters of the Vortex" and "First Lensman" by E. E. Smith show
how to do that kind of story properly.
How do I suggest to Steve Moffat that he do your suggested story?
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
If the workers tried to quit, the company would just direct the
spacesuits to kill them, as per this episode!
No company in existence would have been allowed to sell oxygen to
its workers in space. Imagine an oil company on Earth being allowed
to sell oxygen to divers on the sea floor or in its submarines in
order for them to do their job. It is totally unthinkable.
I have read SF novels in which people have to buy air, such as Robert
Heinlein's "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress".
Unfortunately this story had no credibility whatsoever since it failed
to deal with the issue of having to buy air, the background political
situation and why it needed to be bought by workers in the first place
properly.
I have read stories in which people on space stations or on planets with hostile atmospheres have to buy air, due to the air having to be brought up from Earth or mined from local resources.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Do the writers on this show have any
Post by Agamemnon
fucking clue whatsoever? Read "First Lensman" by E E Smith which
deals with these issues properly.
Is that story part of the Doctor Who canon? If not, its irrelevant to this discussion.
Poppycock. It shows you how to address those kinds of issue properly.
Besides which it became Doctor Who canon along with the entire Lensman
series after my S11 Christmas Special, The Manifestation.
Has the BBC actually agreed to film your story? If not, then your story isn't canonical, so E.E. Smith's stories aren't caonical either.
Tim Bruening
2017-05-15 02:00:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Anyone applying for a job with company would know how they operated
and refuse to work for them under these conditions.
HOW would the workers know that the company will execute them if they
fail to make quota? Who's forcing the company to tell them?
Don't these people have families that care about them and would demand
to know what happened to them? Why happened to the previous workers? Did
they ever get back home?
Another poster surmised that the company passed off any fatalities as accidents. Certainly, we all thought at first that the rogue spacesuit situation was either an accident or a terrorist hacking.
Tim Bruening
2017-05-15 02:20:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Agamemnon
Even the workers themselves would see to it that it was
Post by Agamemnon
closed down. See the 194- chapter in Triplanatary by E. E. Simth.
Is it canonical that the events in "Triplanetary" are part of the
Doctor Who Universe? If so, please cite your sources. If not, why
Triplanetary became canonical when my S11 Christmas Special was based on
it.
Post by Agamemnon
would that story be relevant to the current discussions of
employer/employee relations in space?
Because it's about employer employee relations as is First Lensman which
is about employer employee relations in space. And if you want to know
about asteroid mining and one of the main protagonists being blinded and
how to foreshadow and deal with it in a credible manner by giving the
character an extra sense of 'perception' then read Gray Lensman.
So you are speculating that the Doctor has an extra sense of perception that allowed him to read the program and alter it without either seeing or feeling it?

The Doctor does have telepathic powers. Perhaps he read the computer's mind!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:40:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard for
health and safety when any firm of lawyers would jump at the chance
to sue them for every last penny they posses?
I surmise that labor unions have been abolished and limits placed on lawyers.
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to work for
a different company that offers better working conditions?
Perhaps there is only ONE company working the asteroid mines!
If there was just one company they it would be under strict regulation
and supervision.
Not if its very politically powerful, and thus can bribe the regulators!
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
If the workers tried to quit, the company would just direct the spacesuits to kill them, as per this episode!
No company in existence would have been allowed to sell oxygen to its
workers in space. Imagine an oil company on Earth being allowed to sell
oxygen to divers on the sea floor or in its submarines in order for them
to do their job. It is totally unthinkable.
I have read SF novels in which people have to buy air, such as Robert Heinlein's "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress".
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
The moron
Post by Agamemnon
that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue how
capitalism works.
They might have seen how it worked in the 19th century, then exaggerated for satiric effect.
Poppycock. You'd only treat your workers like that if your were
operating illegally and they workers you employed were all fugitive
criminals who no one cared about.
Maybe the company WAS operating illegally, and had bribed Earth's governments to ignore their violations of worker safety regs.
Do the writers on this show have any
Post by Agamemnon
fucking clue whatsoever? Read "First Lensman" by E E Smith which deals
with these issues properly.
Is that story part of the Doctor Who canon? If not, its irrelevant to this discussion.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
Post by Agamemnon
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and work for
someone else.
How can the workers change jobs if they are out in the asteroid belt?
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place,
especially one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of society
would work for an employer like that and they wouldn't tolerate being
treated like shit. They'd be out to kill their bosses at the first
opportunity and take their jobs themselves, especially since murder
seems to no longer be a crime.
How do you KNOW that the general public KNOWS about that particular employer's worker termination practices?
Anyone applying for a job with company would know how they operated and
refuse to work for them under these conditions.
HOW would the workers know that the company will execute them if they fail to make quota? Who's forcing the company to tell them?
If this was a legal
Post by Agamemnon
company it would be regulated and have to undergo regular inspections by
the authorities including health and safety which would close it down in
an instant.
I am assuming that worker safety regulations have been greatly weakened and/or the regulatory agencies are toothless. Right now, Trump is attempting to weaken regulations right and left.
Even the workers themselves would see to it that it was
Post by Agamemnon
closed down. See the 194- chapter in Triplanatary by E. E. Simth.
Is it canonical that the events in "Triplanetary" are part of the Doctor Who Universe? If so, please cite your sources. If not, why would that story be relevant to the current discussions of employer/employee relations in space?
Very Good question.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:33:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard for
health and safety when any firm of lawyers would jump at the chance
to sue them for every last penny they posses?
I surmise that labor unions have been abolished and limits placed on lawyers.
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to work for
a different company that offers better working conditions?
Perhaps there is only ONE company working the asteroid mines!
If there was just one company they it would be under strict regulation
and supervision.
Post by Tim Bruening
If the workers tried to quit, the company would just direct the
spacesuits to kill them, as per this episode!
No company in existence would have been allowed to sell oxygen to its
workers in space. Imagine an oil company on Earth being allowed to sell
oxygen to divers on the sea floor or in its submarines in order for them
to do their job. It is totally unthinkable.
Post by Tim Bruening
The moron
Post by Agamemnon
that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue how
capitalism works.
They might have seen how it worked in the 19th century, then
exaggerated for satiric effect.
Poppycock. You'd only treat your workers like that if your were
operating illegally and they workers you employed were all fugitive
criminals who no one cared about. Do the writers on this show have any
fucking clue whatsoever? Read "First Lensman" by E E Smith which deals
with these issues properly.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
Post by Agamemnon
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and work for
someone else.
How can the workers change jobs if they are out in the asteroid belt?
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place,
especially one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of society
would work for an employer like that and they wouldn't tolerate being
treated like shit. They'd be out to kill their bosses at the first
opportunity and take their jobs themselves, especially since murder
seems to no longer be a crime.
How do you KNOW that the general public KNOWS about that particular
employer's worker termination practices?
Anyone applying for a job with company would know how they operated and
refuse to work for them under these conditions. If this was a legal
company it would be regulated and have to undergo regular inspections by
the authorities including health and safety which would close it down in
an instant. Even the workers themselves would see to it that it was
closed down. See the 194- chapter in Triplanatary by E. E. Simth.
ISBN please!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 22:38:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard for
health and safety when any firm of lawyers would jump at the chance
to sue them for every last penny they posses?
I surmise that labor unions have been abolished and limits placed on lawyers.
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to work for
a different company that offers better working conditions?
Perhaps there is only ONE company working the asteroid mines!
If there was just one company they it would be under strict regulation
and supervision.
Post by Tim Bruening
If the workers tried to quit, the company would just direct the
spacesuits to kill them, as per this episode!
No company in existence would have been allowed to sell oxygen to its
workers in space. Imagine an oil company on Earth being allowed to sell
oxygen to divers on the sea floor or in its submarines in order for them
to do their job. It is totally unthinkable.
Post by Tim Bruening
The moron
Post by Agamemnon
that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue how
capitalism works.
They might have seen how it worked in the 19th century, then
exaggerated for satiric effect.
Poppycock. You'd only treat your workers like that if your were
operating illegally and they workers you employed were all fugitive
criminals who no one cared about. Do the writers on this show have any
fucking clue whatsoever? Read "First Lensman" by E E Smith which deals
with these issues properly.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
Post by Agamemnon
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and work for
someone else.
How can the workers change jobs if they are out in the asteroid belt?
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place,
especially one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of society
would work for an employer like that and they wouldn't tolerate being
treated like shit. They'd be out to kill their bosses at the first
opportunity and take their jobs themselves, especially since murder
seems to no longer be a crime.
How do you KNOW that the general public KNOWS about that particular
employer's worker termination practices?
Anyone applying for a job with company would know how they operated and
refuse to work for them under these conditions. If this was a legal
company it would be regulated and have to undergo regular inspections by
the authorities including health and safety which would close it down in
an instant. Even the workers themselves would see to it that it was
closed down. See the 194- chapter in Triplanatary by E. E. Simth.
ISBN please!
Try typing the titles on Gutenberg of Amazaon if you want a printed version.
The Coca Cola Kid
2017-05-14 15:09:55 UTC
Permalink
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to work for a
different company that offers better working conditions?
The fact that they are already in a very remote location and by this point
are at the mercy of the company as to whether they can come or go would put
a huge dent in that. And before you whinge again about them choosing to
work for that company in the first place, there are a number of factors
which could cause them not to know in advance.
The moron that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue how
capitalism works.
Or, more likely, he and other writers this season are focusing on the
excesses and abuses of Capitalism, which morons who have a naïve and
idealistic view of turn a blind eye to. If you think that they are making
straw man arguments, then it is fair enough to discuss and call that out in
each case, but the fact that you make it so vitriolic and personal suggests
that you are a reactionary defending an idea as if it were a religion.
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
The governments of so-called developed countries are full of checks and
balances, yet they are often circumvented without significant consequence.
Things like this do happen in the real world, unlike in the vacuum of
idealism where both Capitalism and Communism exist.
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place, especially
one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of society would work for an
employer like that and they wouldn't tolerate being treated like shit.
They'd be out to kill their bosses at the first opportunity and take their
jobs themselves, especially since murder seems to no longer be a crime.
Why are you assuming that the company had a bad reputation? Assuming that
this had happened before with this company (which we do not know - things
may have changed), the deaths were mostly likely reported as accidents.
Miners know that there are significant risks when they take the job.
How easily could you change your job?
How much do you take for granted that you can easily change your job? For
many people, whether they are living paycheck to paycheck or are stuck in
the inner cities or the Applachians, they do not have that luxury. Or they
do not know that they have that luxury because they have been conditioned
over time into believing that they do not.
Post by Tim Bruening
The anti-trust laws must have been eliminated along with the labor
unions, lawyers, and worker safety regulations. I'm assuming that
Trump played a big role in the above.
Really?
I cannot tell whether Timmy was being facetious or sarcastic, but the point
is that people like Trump do want to significantly weaken those protections
and regulations
Post by Tim Bruening
The checks and balances came about because of worker activism. They
could be eliminated if the corporations become really dominant.
Yer right. And murder and corporate manslaughter are no longer crimes
either. What sort of society is this? One run by the mafia? See above to
see how disrespected workers deal with their bosses in a lawless mafia
state. They don't get to live long. Read E E Smith's Lensman series.
Abuses and atrocities like this usually go on for a long time, bubbling
under the surface, before they come to a head and people revolt. And even
after such revolts occur, in the long term it's like a pendulum.
Collectively, humans have a short memory.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why does Nardole need a space suit when he's a robot?
I understand that he's a cyborg, so would still need air.
He admired in this episode that we was an AI just like the one on the ship.
I did not notice this. At which point in the episode was this line?
Post by Tim Bruening
The spacesuits aren't as smart as humans.
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man. There must be some financial motivation to it. If
oxygen is so expensive, then it would be more profitable to kill the
inefficient and demoralised workers off (and presumably collect insurance
money for the "accident"), rather than waste oxygen on bringing them back
from their remote work site.
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 17:21:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to work
for a different company that offers better working conditions?
The fact that they are already in a very remote location and by this
point are at the mercy of the company as to whether they can come or go
would put a huge dent in that. And before you whinge again about them
choosing to work for that company in the first place, there are a number
of factors which could cause them not to know in advance.
Like what? The company murdering every single employee?

What's happened to law enforcement in this fantasy land?
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
The moron that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue
how capitalism works.
Or, more likely, he and other writers this season are focusing on the
excesses and abuses of Capitalism, which morons who have a naïve and
idealistic view of turn a blind eye to. If you think that they are
making straw man arguments, then it is fair enough to discuss and call
that out in each case, but the fact that you make it so vitriolic and
personal suggests that you are a reactionary defending an idea as if it
were a religion.
This script had no credibility whatsoever was written by a complete and
utter clueless moron that doesn't have a clue how to write.

Given that the existence of the law, regulations, law enforcement,
government, the free press, communications, politicians, and workers
right they writer is obliged to explain where these all went and how
companies are allowed to get away with murder and no one else knowing
about it. This is just like the pile shit we were given last week where
6 students go missing from the same house every 20 years and it's like
none of them have even told their parents or universities where they are
staying and they police are so incompetent that they can't even connect
the dissonances together or be bothered to investigate.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
The governments of so-called developed countries are full of checks and
balances, yet they are often circumvented without significant
consequence. Things like this do happen in the real world, unlike in the
vacuum of idealism where both Capitalism and Communism exist.
Starving your workforce of Oxygen is murder. No one in any country in
this world will allow a plane take off on long haul flight without them
providing a nutritious free meal to every passenger after a certain
number of hours or providing oxygen masks in case of emergency. So how
would this be allowed to happen in space?

This is MONSTER RAVING LOONY LAND this episodes is set in.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place,
especially one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of society
would work for an employer like that and they wouldn't tolerate being
treated like shit. They'd be out to kill their bosses at the first
opportunity and take their jobs themselves, especially since murder
seems to no longer be a crime.
Why are you assuming that the company had a bad reputation? Assuming
that this had happened before with this company (which we do not know -
things may have changed), the deaths were mostly likely reported as
accidents. Miners know that there are significant risks when they take
the job.
An accident would have had to be instigated by the authorities. Just
look at what happened when the door of the Millennium Falcon fell on
Harrison Ford's foot and could have nearly killed him. The production
company were fined something like £2,000,000 pounds and it made the news
headlines all over the world. It would not be in any companies
interests to murder its employees and charging them for the oxygen they
needed to live and work in space would have bean cause for closing the
company down as would forcing the astronauts to live and work in a
depressurised space station.

What happens if your suite springs a leak? How do you change into a new
one without any air to breath outside? How did the Doctor change suites
with Bill in an airless environment? Why didn't Nardole give up his suit
since he's a AI robot and robots don't need air and if they suffer
damage can easily be repaired? The writer and producer don't have a
fucking clue!
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
How easily could you change your job?
How much do you take for granted that you can easily change your job?
For many people, whether they are living paycheck to paycheck or are
stuck in the inner cities or the Applachians, they do not have that
luxury. Or they do not know that they have that luxury because they
have been conditioned over time into believing that they do not.
The only way workers would have stayed working with a company like this,
one that makes you pay for your air, and which flouts all health and
safety regulations is if they were being paid a fortune compared to
other employers. The only alternative is that all the workers were
convicted criminals. To see how as story like this should be done
properly read "First Lensman" by E. E. Smith (the chapter where Virgil
Samms goes harvesting the leaves the drug Thionite is made from in a
depressurised ship on a planet where it is impossible to navigate and
where most of the people sent there don't ever come back, and the
chapter where Conway Costigan takes an undercover job with a mining company.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
The anti-trust laws must have been eliminated along with the labor
unions, lawyers, and worker safety regulations. I'm assuming that
Trump played a big role in the above.
Really?
I cannot tell whether Timmy was being facetious or sarcastic, but the
point is that people like Trump do want to significantly weaken those
protections and regulations
There will always be laws and lawyers to stop companies from murdering
their workers.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
The checks and balances came about because of worker activism. They
could be eliminated if the corporations become really dominant.
Yer right. And murder and corporate manslaughter are no longer crimes
either. What sort of society is this? One run by the mafia? See above
to see how disrespected workers deal with their bosses in a lawless
mafia state. They don't get to live long. Read E E Smith's Lensman
series.
Abuses and atrocities like this usually go on for a long time, bubbling
under the surface, before they come to a head and people revolt. And
even after such revolts occur, in the long term it's like a pendulum.
Collectively, humans have a short memory.
Poppycock. No company would be allowed to murder its workers by refusing
to sell them oxygen. No ship would be allowed into space which
restricted the supply of food of oxygen to the people on board by
forcing them to pay for it. What would happen if you couldn't afford it?
Death. Just how much more crazy can you possibly get? This is a
pantomime story not science fiction. It goes way beyond any credible
fantasy.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why does Nardole need a space suit when he's a robot?
I understand that he's a cyborg, so would still need air.
He admired in this episode that we was an AI just like the one on the
admitted
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
ship.
I did not notice this. At which point in the episode was this line?
When he begins talking to the suit's AI and says he knew her from a
former relationship.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
The spacesuits aren't as smart as humans.
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and
replace them.
Use your brain, man. There must be some financial motivation to it. If
Yer right. This workers deaths would have been investigated, the
managers and people who sent them to their deaths would have been
convicted of murder and jailed for life or executed and the company
fined more money than it could possibly afford and closed down and it's
board where were not yet in jail or death row would have been banned
from being directors of a company ever again for life.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
oxygen is so expensive, then it would be more profitable to kill the
inefficient and demoralised workers off (and presumably collect
POPPYCOCK! Human life is more valuable than oxygen.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
insurance money for the "accident"), rather than waste oxygen on
bringing them back from their remote work site.
Oh, so now they want to scam the insurance company too. That's two
murder investigations then. One paid for by the insurance company and
the other by the law.

A travesty of a pantomime if ever there was one. Not even the crapy
Sylvester McCoy was given to work with stooped to this level of incredulity.
The Coca Cola Kid
2017-05-15 00:31:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
This script had no credibility whatsoever was written by a complete and
utter clueless moron that doesn't have a clue how to write.
A very apt summary of your reviews and follow-up responses.
Post by Agamemnon
Given that the existence of the law, regulations, law enforcement,
government, the free press, communications, politicians, and workers right
they writer is obliged to explain where these all went and how companies
are allowed to get away with murder and no one else knowing about it.
The writer has to write within the constraints of the format imposed by the
executive producers at the BBC. I too have complaints about the decisions
made in regard to that, but like any mature adult I recognise that it is not
necessarily the fault of the writers and that it is out of line to hurl
abuse at them like you have been doing.

Given the limitation of 43 minutes to tell a story, there is no way that the
writer could have stopped to spoon feed all the details that you think he
should have to the audience. Even if that were possible, most of them would
have either felt bored (if they were younger) or that their intelligences
were being insulted for spelling out the obvious.

Whether we like it or not, the style of Doctor Who has changed from the days
when most stories had 90+ minutes to develop and flesh out their plots. I
personally prefer the old style compared to the current comic book pastiche,
but it is what it is. Being a dick about it is not going to do anything to
change it for the better.
Post by Agamemnon
An accident would have had to be instigated by the authorities.
Which authorities? How would they conduct an investigation in such a remote
part of outer space, especially after the company took care of all the
witness and had time to clean up all of the evidence?

Of course, as a result of the Doctor getting involved, two of the crew
members were saved and it likely was investigated after that which brought
attention to it and resulted in the possible rebellion six months later that
the Doctor alluded to in the dialogue.
Post by Agamemnon
Just look at what happened when the door of the Millennium Falcon fell on
Harrison Ford's foot and could have nearly killed him. The production
company were fined something like £2,000,000 pounds and it made the news
headlines all over the world.
One is an incident involving a very famous movie star that took place on
Earth, the other involving obscure contractors who signed up for a dangerous
job in a very remote location. Are you just taking the piss and trolling
here with that comparison? Well yes, of course you are.
Post by Agamemnon
It would not be in any companies interests to murder its employees and
charging them for the oxygen they needed to live and work in space would
have bean cause for closing the company down as would forcing the
astronauts to live and work in a depressurised space station.
It is certainly not in their long term interests, but if you think that in
the real world companies and their investors do not often put short term
financial gains ahead of their long term interests then you are the one
living in a fantasy world.
Post by Agamemnon
What happens if your suite springs a leak? How do you change into a new one
without any air to breath outside? How did the Doctor change suites with
Bill in an airless environment?
He did not. It was clearly explained the he just gave her his helmet.
Post by Agamemnon
Why didn't Nardole give up his suit since he's a AI robot and robots don't
need air and if they suffer damage can easily be repaired?
Because he is not an AI robot. He is a cyborg, as has been clearly
established in the show.
Post by Agamemnon
There will always be laws and lawyers to stop companies from murdering
their workers.
It would be nice to believe that, but the real world/universe is not like
that 'always' and everywhere. Stuff happens, especially during times of
expansion into new frontiers. And when idiot politicians go to extreme
lengths to loosen rules or regulations, or go to the opposite extreme and
make so many that they cannot even keep track of them, it can even happen
back home. If you do not know what I mean, then Google the phrase 'veneer
of civilization'.
Post by Agamemnon
Poppycock. No company would be allowed to murder its workers by refusing to
sell them oxygen. No ship would be allowed into space which restricted the
supply of food of oxygen to the people on board by forcing them to pay for
it. What would happen if you couldn't afford it? Death. Just how much more
crazy can you possibly get? This is a pantomime story not science fiction.
It goes way beyond any credible fantasy.
It is plainly obvious to most reading this that you are banging on a straw
man when you talk about the company being 'allowed' to murder its workers.
Of course what happened was not legal. But it happened as a result of lax
oversight and accountability, combined with automation and AI being
implemented increasingly and incrementally at the cost and quality of human
life and human rights, which is actually happening today.
Post by Agamemnon
When [Nardole] begins talking to the suit's AI and says he knew her from a
former relationship.
So? That does not mean that he is an AI robot. But you know that.

[snip]
Post by Agamemnon
A travesty of a pantomime if ever there was one. Not even the crapy
Sylvester McCoy was given to work with stooped to this level of
incredulity.
If you are just doing a parody of a fan curmudgeon, then well done.
Otherwise your posts are a complete failure. Even Yads' recent reviews come
across as relatively coherent and reasonable.
The Doctor
2017-05-15 00:34:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
This script had no credibility whatsoever was written by a complete and
utter clueless moron that doesn't have a clue how to write.
A very apt summary of your reviews and follow-up responses.
Post by Agamemnon
Given that the existence of the law, regulations, law enforcement,
government, the free press, communications, politicians, and workers right
they writer is obliged to explain where these all went and how companies
are allowed to get away with murder and no one else knowing about it.
The writer has to write within the constraints of the format imposed by the
executive producers at the BBC. I too have complaints about the decisions
made in regard to that, but like any mature adult I recognise that it is not
necessarily the fault of the writers and that it is out of line to hurl
abuse at them like you have been doing.
Given the limitation of 43 minutes to tell a story, there is no way that the
writer could have stopped to spoon feed all the details that you think he
should have to the audience. Even if that were possible, most of them would
have either felt bored (if they were younger) or that their intelligences
were being insulted for spelling out the obvious.
Whether we like it or not, the style of Doctor Who has changed from the days
when most stories had 90+ minutes to develop and flesh out their plots. I
personally prefer the old style compared to the current comic book pastiche,
but it is what it is. Being a dick about it is not going to do anything to
change it for the better.
Post by Agamemnon
An accident would have had to be instigated by the authorities.
Which authorities? How would they conduct an investigation in such a remote
part of outer space, especially after the company took care of all the
witness and had time to clean up all of the evidence?
Of course, as a result of the Doctor getting involved, two of the crew
members were saved and it likely was investigated after that which brought
attention to it and resulted in the possible rebellion six months later that
the Doctor alluded to in the dialogue.
Post by Agamemnon
Just look at what happened when the door of the Millennium Falcon fell on
Harrison Ford's foot and could have nearly killed him. The production
company were fined something like £2,000,000 pounds and it made the news
headlines all over the world.
One is an incident involving a very famous movie star that took place on
Earth, the other involving obscure contractors who signed up for a dangerous
job in a very remote location. Are you just taking the piss and trolling
here with that comparison? Well yes, of course you are.
Post by Agamemnon
It would not be in any companies interests to murder its employees and
charging them for the oxygen they needed to live and work in space would
have bean cause for closing the company down as would forcing the
astronauts to live and work in a depressurised space station.
It is certainly not in their long term interests, but if you think that in
the real world companies and their investors do not often put short term
financial gains ahead of their long term interests then you are the one
living in a fantasy world.
Post by Agamemnon
What happens if your suite springs a leak? How do you change into a new one
without any air to breath outside? How did the Doctor change suites with
Bill in an airless environment?
He did not. It was clearly explained the he just gave her his helmet.
Post by Agamemnon
Why didn't Nardole give up his suit since he's a AI robot and robots don't
need air and if they suffer damage can easily be repaired?
Because he is not an AI robot. He is a cyborg, as has been clearly
established in the show.
Post by Agamemnon
There will always be laws and lawyers to stop companies from murdering
their workers.
It would be nice to believe that, but the real world/universe is not like
that 'always' and everywhere. Stuff happens, especially during times of
expansion into new frontiers. And when idiot politicians go to extreme
lengths to loosen rules or regulations, or go to the opposite extreme and
make so many that they cannot even keep track of them, it can even happen
back home. If you do not know what I mean, then Google the phrase 'veneer
of civilization'.
Post by Agamemnon
Poppycock. No company would be allowed to murder its workers by refusing to
sell them oxygen. No ship would be allowed into space which restricted the
supply of food of oxygen to the people on board by forcing them to pay for
it. What would happen if you couldn't afford it? Death. Just how much more
crazy can you possibly get? This is a pantomime story not science fiction.
It goes way beyond any credible fantasy.
It is plainly obvious to most reading this that you are banging on a straw
man when you talk about the company being 'allowed' to murder its workers.
Of course what happened was not legal. But it happened as a result of lax
oversight and accountability, combined with automation and AI being
implemented increasingly and incrementally at the cost and quality of human
life and human rights, which is actually happening today.
Post by Agamemnon
When [Nardole] begins talking to the suit's AI and says he knew her from a
former relationship.
So? That does not mean that he is an AI robot. But you know that.
[snip]
Post by Agamemnon
A travesty of a pantomime if ever there was one. Not even the crapy
Sylvester McCoy was given to work with stooped to this level of incredulity.
If you are just doing a parody of a fan curmudgeon, then well done.
Otherwise your posts are a complete failure. Even Yads' recent reviews come
across as relatively coherent and reasonable.
Thank you!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Agamemnon
2017-05-15 03:24:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
This script had no credibility whatsoever was written by a
complete and utter clueless moron that doesn't have a clue how to
write.
A very apt summary of your reviews and follow-up responses.
A very apt expression of your level of comprehension.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Given that the existence of the law, regulations, law enforcement,
government, the free press, communications, politicians, and
workers right they writer is obliged to explain where these all
went and how companies are allowed to get away with murder and no
one else knowing about it.
The writer has to write within the constraints of the format imposed
by the executive producers at the BBC. I too have complaints about
the decisions made in regard to that, but like any mature adult I
recognise that it is not necessarily the fault of the writers and
that it is out of line to hurl abuse at them like you have been
doing.
Not the fault of the writers that the Doctor after being blinded by
Moffat is able to rewire and reprogramme the safety systems of a nuclear
reactor while wearing a pair of space gloves so that it blows if any of
the crew die? Not the fault of the writer? Constraints of the format?
What format is this? Moronic Pantomime!!!!!!!
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Given the limitation of 43 minutes to tell a story, there is no way
that the writer could have stopped to spoon feed all the details that
you think he should have to the audience. Even if that were
possible, most of them would have either felt bored (if they were
younger) or that their intelligences were being insulted for spelling
out the obvious.
A blind man rewiring and reprogramming the safety systems of a nuclear
reactor while wearing a pair of space gloves so that it blows if any of
the crew die?
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Whether we like it or not, the style of Doctor Who has changed from
the days when most stories had 90+ minutes to develop and flesh out
their plots. I personally prefer the old style compared to the
current comic book pastiche, but it is what it is. Being a dick
about it is not going to do anything to change it for the better.
A blind man rewiring and reprogramming the safety systems of a nuclear
reactor while wearing a pair of space gloves so that it blows if any of
the crew die?

Who is being the dick here? Certainly not me.

Only a complete moron could come up with a plot like this.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
An accident would have had to be instigated by the authorities.
Which authorities? How would they conduct an investigation in such
a remote part of outer space, especially after the company took care
of all the witness and had time to clean up all of the evidence?
When did the company do this? The writer has said nothing and until he
explains the absence of an investigation this story will continue to
have not credibility whatsoever.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Of course, as a result of the Doctor getting involved, two of the
crew members were saved and it likely was investigated after that
which brought attention to it and resulted in the possible rebellion
six months later that the Doctor alluded to in the dialogue.
And like they were too moronic to actually send out a massage about what
was actually going on.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Just look at what happened when the door of the Millennium Falcon
fell on Harrison Ford's foot and could have nearly killed him. The
production company were fined something like £2,000,000 pounds and
it made the news headlines all over the world.
One is an incident involving a very famous movie star that took place
on Earth, the other involving obscure contractors who signed up for
a dangerous job in a very remote location. Are you just taking the
piss and trolling here with that comparison? Well yes, of course you
are.
They were not contractors. They were employers. Contracts provide their
own tools and equipment including space vessels.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
It would not be in any companies interests to murder its employees
and charging them for the oxygen they needed to live and work in
space would have bean cause for closing the company down as would
forcing the astronauts to live and work in a depressurised space
station.
It is certainly not in their long term interests, but if you think
that in the real world companies and their investors do not often put
short term financial gains ahead of their long term interests then
you are the one living in a fantasy world.
Yer right, so they decide to murder their own workers. It would at least
have given this codswallop more credibility if members of the management
were showing directing this conspiracy and getting their comeuppance.
But this show stopped being credible when Stephen Moffat had his mental
breakdown which also caused the last series of Sherlock to loose all
credibility too.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
What happens if your suite springs a leak? How do you change into
a new one without any air to breath outside? How did the Doctor
change suites with Bill in an airless environment?
He did not. It was clearly explained the he just gave her his
helmet.
Whatever. What your suit springs a leak and you need to put on a new one
in a vacuum? How do you go to the toilet? How do you eat and drink in a
vacuum? Did the writer think about any of these things?
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Why didn't Nardole give up his suit since he's a AI robot and
robots don't need air and if they suffer damage can easily be
repaired?
Because he is not an AI robot. He is a cyborg, as has been clearly
established in the show.
It was established in this episode that he dated the space suite AI
therefore he is an AI himself.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
There will always be laws and lawyers to stop companies from
murdering their workers.
It would be nice to believe that, but the real world/universe is not
like that 'always' and everywhere. Stuff happens, especially during
times of expansion into new frontiers. And when idiot politicians go
to extreme lengths to loosen rules or regulations, or go to the
opposite extreme and make so many that they cannot even keep track of
them, it can even happen back home. If you do not know what I mean,
then Google the phrase 'veneer of civilization'.
Unfortunately the writer did not expand on any of this like E. E. Smith
did in "First Lensman" or the WW2 munitions short story in "Triplanetary".
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Poppycock. No company would be allowed to murder its workers by
refusing to sell them oxygen. No ship would be allowed into space
which restricted the supply of food of oxygen to the people on
board by forcing them to pay for it. What would happen if you
couldn't afford it? Death. Just how much more crazy can you
possibly get? This is a pantomime story not science fiction. It
goes way beyond any credible fantasy.
It is plainly obvious to most reading this that you are banging on a
straw man when you talk about the company being 'allowed' to murder
its workers. Of course what happened was not legal. But it happened
as a result of lax oversight and accountability, combined with
Where does the writer touch on any of these things?
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
automation and AI being implemented increasingly and incrementally at
the cost and quality of human life and human rights, which is
actually happening today.
Nobody would programme an AI to be stupid. The same does for the idiot
AI in episode 2.
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
When [Nardole] begins talking to the suit's AI and says he knew
her from a former relationship.
So? That does not mean that he is an AI robot. But you know that.
Yes it does. How else would he know her?
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
[snip]
Post by Agamemnon
A travesty of a pantomime if ever there was one. Not even the
crapy Sylvester McCoy was given to work with stooped to this level
of incredulity.
If you are just doing a parody of a fan curmudgeon, then well done.
Otherwise your posts are a complete failure. Even Yads' recent
reviews come across as relatively coherent and reasonable.
You must be joking.

A blind man rewiring and reprogramming the safety systems of a nuclear
reactor while wearing a pair of space gloves so that it blows if any of
the crew die?

This episode is totally laughable.
The Coca Cola Kid
2017-05-15 03:54:36 UTC
Permalink
Okay, I get it. This is either some sort of internet performance art with
you, or as others suggested a manifestation of some sort of disability that
you have, or both. In any case, hope that you feel better soon and find
something positive and constructive to do with your life.

Just one quick point...
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
When [Nardole] begins talking to the suit's AI and says he knew
her from a former relationship.
So? That does not mean that he is an AI robot. But you know that.
Yes it does. How else would he know her?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1798709/
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:26:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to work for a
different company that offers better working conditions?
The fact that they are already in a very remote location and by this point
are at the mercy of the company as to whether they can come or go would put
a huge dent in that. And before you whinge again about them choosing to
work for that company in the first place, there are a number of factors
which could cause them not to know in advance.
The moron that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue how
capitalism works.
Or, more likely, he and other writers this season are focusing on the
excesses and abuses of Capitalism, which morons who have a naïve and
idealistic view of turn a blind eye to. If you think that they are making
straw man arguments, then it is fair enough to discuss and call that out in
each case, but the fact that you make it so vitriolic and personal suggests
that you are a reactionary defending an idea as if it were a religion.
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
The governments of so-called developed countries are full of checks and
balances, yet they are often circumvented without significant consequence.
Things like this do happen in the real world, unlike in the vacuum of
idealism where both Capitalism and Communism exist.
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place, especially
one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of society would work for an
employer like that and they wouldn't tolerate being treated like shit.
They'd be out to kill their bosses at the first opportunity and take their
jobs themselves, especially since murder seems to no longer be a crime.
Why are you assuming that the company had a bad reputation? Assuming that
this had happened before with this company (which we do not know - things
may have changed), the deaths were mostly likely reported as accidents.
Miners know that there are significant risks when they take the job.
How easily could you change your job?
How much do you take for granted that you can easily change your job? For
many people, whether they are living paycheck to paycheck or are stuck in
the inner cities or the Applachians, they do not have that luxury. Or they
do not know that they have that luxury because they have been conditioned
over time into believing that they do not.
Post by Tim Bruening
The anti-trust laws must have been eliminated along with the labor
unions, lawyers, and worker safety regulations. I'm assuming that
Trump played a big role in the above.
Really?
I cannot tell whether Timmy was being facetious or sarcastic, but the point
is that people like Trump do want to significantly weaken those protections
and regulations
Post by Tim Bruening
The checks and balances came about because of worker activism. They
could be eliminated if the corporations become really dominant.
Yer right. And murder and corporate manslaughter are no longer crimes
either. What sort of society is this? One run by the mafia? See above to
see how disrespected workers deal with their bosses in a lawless mafia
state. They don't get to live long. Read E E Smith's Lensman series.
Abuses and atrocities like this usually go on for a long time, bubbling
under the surface, before they come to a head and people revolt. And even
after such revolts occur, in the long term it's like a pendulum.
Collectively, humans have a short memory.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why does Nardole need a space suit when he's a robot?
I understand that he's a cyborg, so would still need air.
He admired in this episode that we was an AI just like the one on the ship.
I did not notice this. At which point in the episode was this line?
Post by Tim Bruening
The spacesuits aren't as smart as humans.
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man. There must be some financial motivation to it. If
oxygen is so expensive, then it would be more profitable to kill the
inefficient and demoralised workers off (and presumably collect insurance
money for the "accident"), rather than waste oxygen on bringing them back
from their remote work site.
Even CCK is going after Ag.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Coca Cola Kid
2017-05-14 15:09:55 UTC
Permalink
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to work for a
different company that offers better working conditions?
The fact that they are already in a very remote location and by this point
are at the mercy of the company as to whether they can come or go would put
a huge dent in that. And before you whinge again about them choosing to
work for that company in the first place, there are a number of factors
which could cause them not to know in advance.
The moron that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue how
capitalism works.
Or, more likely, he and other writers this season are focusing on the
excesses and abuses of Capitalism, which morons who have a naïve and
idealistic view of turn a blind eye to. If you think that they are making
straw man arguments, then it is fair enough to discuss and call that out in
each case, but the fact that you make it so vitriolic and personal suggests
that you are a reactionary defending an idea as if it were a religion.
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
The governments of so-called developed countries are full of checks and
balances, yet they are often circumvented without significant consequence.
Things like this do happen in the real world, unlike in the vacuum of
idealism where both Capitalism and Communism exist.
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place, especially
one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of society would work for an
employer like that and they wouldn't tolerate being treated like shit.
They'd be out to kill their bosses at the first opportunity and take their
jobs themselves, especially since murder seems to no longer be a crime.
Why are you assuming that the company had a bad reputation? Assuming that
this had happened before with this company (which we do not know - things
may have changed), the deaths were mostly likely reported as accidents.
Miners know that there are significant risks when they take the job.
How easily could you change your job?
How much do you take for granted that you can easily change your job? For
many people, whether they are living paycheck to paycheck or are stuck in
the inner cities or the Applachians, they do not have that luxury. Or they
do not know that they have that luxury because they have been conditioned
over time into believing that they do not.
Post by Tim Bruening
The anti-trust laws must have been eliminated along with the labor
unions, lawyers, and worker safety regulations. I'm assuming that
Trump played a big role in the above.
Really?
I cannot tell whether Timmy was being facetious or sarcastic, but the point
is that people like Trump do want to significantly weaken those protections
and regulations
Post by Tim Bruening
The checks and balances came about because of worker activism. They
could be eliminated if the corporations become really dominant.
Yer right. And murder and corporate manslaughter are no longer crimes
either. What sort of society is this? One run by the mafia? See above to
see how disrespected workers deal with their bosses in a lawless mafia
state. They don't get to live long. Read E E Smith's Lensman series.
Abuses and atrocities like this usually go on for a long time, bubbling
under the surface, before they come to a head and people revolt. And even
after such revolts occur, in the long term it's like a pendulum.
Collectively, humans have a short memory.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why does Nardole need a space suit when he's a robot?
I understand that he's a cyborg, so would still need air.
He admired in this episode that we was an AI just like the one on the ship.
I did not notice this. At which point in the episode was this line?
Post by Tim Bruening
The spacesuits aren't as smart as humans.
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man. There must be some financial motivation to it. If
oxygen is so expensive, then it would be more profitable to kill the
inefficient and demoralised workers off (and presumably collect insurance
money for the "accident"), rather than waste oxygen on bringing them back
from their remote work site.
The Coca Cola Kid
2017-05-14 15:11:01 UTC
Permalink
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to work for a
different company that offers better working conditions?
The fact that they are already in a very remote location and by this point
are at the mercy of the company as to whether they can come or go would put
a huge dent in that. And before you whinge again about them choosing to
work for that company in the first place, there are a number of factors
which could cause them not to know in advance.
The moron that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue how
capitalism works.
Or, more likely, he and other writers this season are focusing on the
excesses and abuses of Capitalism, which morons who have a naïve and
idealistic view of turn a blind eye to. If you think that they are making
straw man arguments, then it is fair enough to discuss and call that out in
each case, but the fact that you make it so vitriolic and personal suggests
that you are a reactionary defending an idea as if it were a religion.
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
The governments of so-called developed countries are full of checks and
balances, yet they are often circumvented without significant consequence.
Things like this do happen in the real world, unlike in the vacuum of
idealism where both Capitalism and Communism exist.
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place, especially
one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of society would work for an
employer like that and they wouldn't tolerate being treated like shit.
They'd be out to kill their bosses at the first opportunity and take their
jobs themselves, especially since murder seems to no longer be a crime.
Why are you assuming that the company had a bad reputation? Assuming that
this had happened before with this company (which we do not know - things
may have changed), the deaths were mostly likely reported as accidents.
Miners know that there are significant risks when they take the job.
How easily could you change your job?
How much do you take for granted that you can easily change your job? For
many people, whether they are living paycheck to paycheck or are stuck in
the inner cities or the Applachians, they do not have that luxury. Or they
do not know that they have that luxury because they have been conditioned
over time into believing that they do not.
Post by Tim Bruening
The anti-trust laws must have been eliminated along with the labor
unions, lawyers, and worker safety regulations. I'm assuming that
Trump played a big role in the above.
Really?
I cannot tell whether Timmy was being facetious or sarcastic, but the point
is that people like Trump do want to significantly weaken those protections
and regulations
Post by Tim Bruening
The checks and balances came about because of worker activism. They
could be eliminated if the corporations become really dominant.
Yer right. And murder and corporate manslaughter are no longer crimes
either. What sort of society is this? One run by the mafia? See above to
see how disrespected workers deal with their bosses in a lawless mafia
state. They don't get to live long. Read E E Smith's Lensman series.
Abuses and atrocities like this usually go on for a long time, bubbling
under the surface, before they come to a head and people revolt. And even
after such revolts occur, in the long term it's like a pendulum.
Collectively, humans have a short memory.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why does Nardole need a space suit when he's a robot?
I understand that he's a cyborg, so would still need air.
He admired in this episode that we was an AI just like the one on the ship.
I did not notice this. At which point in the episode was this line?
Post by Tim Bruening
The spacesuits aren't as smart as humans.
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man. There must be some financial motivation to it. If
oxygen is so expensive, then it would be more profitable to kill the
inefficient and demoralised workers off (and presumably collect insurance
money for the "accident"), rather than waste oxygen on bringing them back
from their remote work site.
The Last Doctor
2017-05-14 15:16:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 17:24:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
The Last Doctor
2017-05-14 18:15:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
Aww. How cute. AI could stand for Actual Idiot, in which case "clearly not
written by" is a self evident error.

However, the facts not in evidence are that you ever use your brain. Your
prejudices seem to prevent its effective operation.
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 18:51:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
Aww. How cute. AI could stand for Actual Idiot, in which case "clearly not
written by" is a self evident error.
AI stands for Artificial Intelligence and the fact that you think I
could have been using it any differently proves that the actual idiot is
you.
The Other Doctor
2017-05-14 19:42:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
Aww. How cute. AI could stand for Actual Idiot, in which case "clearly not
written by" is a self evident error.
AI stands for Artificial Intelligence and the fact that you think I
could have been using it any differently proves that the actual idiot is
you.
Um, no Aggy, you do have a tendency to act like an idiot.

For instance, you watched Oxygen and took the whole thing completely
literally. So you missed what it was all about. It wasn't all about
trying to do a realistic, hard SF adventure. It was about mixing in
political observation, where a "suit" had a double meaning. It wasn't
about trying to be scientifically accurate and spoon-feeding people like
you. It was designed to appeal to a contemporary audience. You might not
have appreciated the modern references to things like Facebook and
tweeting. Those of us who are not quite as autistic as yourself did and
we could appreciate both the futuristic setting as well as the more
interesting and more relevant subtext.

That you missed all this is your loss. Sorry.
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 20:24:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
Aww. How cute. AI could stand for Actual Idiot, in which case "clearly not
written by" is a self evident error.
AI stands for Artificial Intelligence and the fact that you think I
could have been using it any differently proves that the actual idiot
is you.
Um, no Aggy, you do have a tendency to act like an idiot.
You are totally deranged.
Post by The Other Doctor
For instance, you watched Oxygen and took the whole thing completely
literally. So you missed what it was all about. It wasn't all about
trying to do a realistic, hard SF adventure. It was about mixing in
political observation, where a "suit" had a double meaning. It wasn't
It was nothing of the kind since it failed to concentrate a plot, story
and characterisation involving any of these issues and only brings them
up as oblique references and jokes made by the Doctor. There were no
individual characters developed in this story at all. The works acting
as nothing more than a chorus to the Doctor's jokes and ridiculous
speakers and Bill was nothing more than the Doctor's tin dog K9 Mk.IV
and Nardole his pet parrot Polynesia.

What this episode was actually about was getting the Doctor blinded and
it couldn't even do that properly since just like everything important
that happens in pile of crap of a series it wasn't even shown happening
but refereed to in retrospect after it occurred off screen.

This has got to be one of the most amateurish and abysmally written
series ever. No wonder hardly anyone is watching it anymore.

Moffat must have had a mental breakdown because he totally ruined
Sherlock as well [as seen by the ratings and the scathing reviews in the
press like the Daily Mail. "Do BBC bigwigs give a fig about viewers?
After enduring the shocking self-indulgent (and much-hyped) Sherlock
finale, our exasperated TV critic says he never wants to watch such
appalling claptrap ever again"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4122872/After-enduring-shocking-self-indulgent-hyped-Sherlock-finale-exasperated-TV-critic-asks-BBC-bigwigs-fig-viewers.html
]
Post by The Other Doctor
about trying to be scientifically accurate and spoon-feeding people like
you. It was designed to appeal to a contemporary audience. You might not
have appreciated the modern references to things like Facebook and
tweeting. Those of us who are not quite as autistic as yourself did and
we could appreciate both the futuristic setting as well as the more
interesting and more relevant subtext.
So that's the new PC loony insult is it. Call anyone who criticises the
author's total inability to write credible and believable
characterisation and relationships or convey emotions properly, and his
totally irrational, illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist plot,
autistic. What a total load of crap.
Post by The Other Doctor
That you missed all this is your loss. Sorry.
Just look at the ratings for this ridiculous episode. 3.57 million. The
lowest they have ever been.

Is everyone that turned off or the the other side because of writer's
total inability to write credible and believable characterisation and
relationships or convey emotions properly, and his totally irrational,
illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist plot, when they have seen all
of these things done properly by authors such as Edgar Rice Burrougs, E.
E. Smith, Alexandre Dumas, Homer, Robert Louis Stephenson, Hugh Lofting,
Frank Herbert and H. G. Wells, autistic as well?
The Other Doctor
2017-05-14 20:38:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
Aww. How cute. AI could stand for Actual Idiot, in which case "clearly not
written by" is a self evident error.
AI stands for Artificial Intelligence and the fact that you think I
could have been using it any differently proves that the actual idiot
is you.
Um, no Aggy, you do have a tendency to act like an idiot.
You are totally deranged.
Post by The Other Doctor
For instance, you watched Oxygen and took the whole thing completely
literally. So you missed what it was all about. It wasn't all about
trying to do a realistic, hard SF adventure. It was about mixing in
political observation, where a "suit" had a double meaning. It wasn't
It was nothing of the kind since it failed to concentrate a plot, story
and characterisation involving any of these issues and only brings them
up as oblique references and jokes made by the Doctor. There were no
individual characters developed in this story at all. The works acting
as nothing more than a chorus to the Doctor's jokes and ridiculous
speakers and Bill was nothing more than the Doctor's tin dog K9 Mk.IV
and Nardole his pet parrot Polynesia.
What this episode was actually about was getting the Doctor blinded and
it couldn't even do that properly since just like everything important
that happens in pile of crap of a series it wasn't even shown happening
but refereed to in retrospect after it occurred off screen.
This has got to be one of the most amateurish and abysmally written
series ever. No wonder hardly anyone is watching it anymore.
Moffat must have had a mental breakdown because he totally ruined
Sherlock as well [as seen by the ratings and the scathing reviews in the
press like the Daily Mail. "Do BBC bigwigs give a fig about viewers?
After enduring the shocking self-indulgent (and much-hyped) Sherlock
finale, our exasperated TV critic says he never wants to watch such
appalling claptrap ever again"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4122872/After-enduring-shocking-self-indulgent-hyped-Sherlock-finale-exasperated-TV-critic-asks-BBC-bigwigs-fig-viewers.html
]
Oh well, if we're basing on how good a story is on how it's been
reviewed by a ragmag, then see
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-reviews/doctor-who-oxygen-review-10415380

"A claustrophobic treat of an episode." "So yes. Good episode, well done
team."
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
about trying to be scientifically accurate and spoon-feeding people like
you. It was designed to appeal to a contemporary audience. You might not
have appreciated the modern references to things like Facebook and
tweeting. Those of us who are not quite as autistic as yourself did and
we could appreciate both the futuristic setting as well as the more
interesting and more relevant subtext.
So that's the new PC loony insult is it. Call anyone who criticises the
author's total inability to write credible and believable
characterisation and relationships or convey emotions properly, and his
totally irrational, illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist plot,
autistic. What a total load of crap.
If the cap fits...
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
That you missed all this is your loss. Sorry.
Just look at the ratings for this ridiculous episode. 3.57 million. The
lowest they have ever been.
Is everyone that turned off or the the other side because of writer's
total inability to write credible and believable characterisation and
relationships or convey emotions properly, and his totally irrational,
illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist plot, when they have seen all
of these things done properly by authors such as Edgar Rice Burrougs, E.
E. Smith, Alexandre Dumas, Homer, Robert Louis Stephenson, Hugh Lofting,
Frank Herbert and H. G. Wells, autistic as well?
Oh - so you have a minute by minute breakdown? You know viewers who
started watching started turning off?

And, well bloody hell. If those are the authors you consider modern
writers should try to emulate then it's no wonder you've got problems
with Doctor Who.

So tell me, Aggy - when did you last enjoy a SF film at the cinema, or a
SF episode on TV - of any show?
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 21:08:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
Aww. How cute. AI could stand for Actual Idiot, in which case "clearly not
written by" is a self evident error.
AI stands for Artificial Intelligence and the fact that you think I
could have been using it any differently proves that the actual idiot
is you.
Um, no Aggy, you do have a tendency to act like an idiot.
You are totally deranged.
Post by The Other Doctor
For instance, you watched Oxygen and took the whole thing completely
literally. So you missed what it was all about. It wasn't all about
trying to do a realistic, hard SF adventure. It was about mixing in
political observation, where a "suit" had a double meaning. It wasn't
It was nothing of the kind since it failed to concentrate a plot,
story and characterisation involving any of these issues and only
brings them up as oblique references and jokes made by the Doctor.
There were no individual characters developed in this story at all.
The works acting as nothing more than a chorus to the Doctor's jokes
and ridiculous speakers and Bill was nothing more than the Doctor's
tin dog K9 Mk.IV and Nardole his pet parrot Polynesia.
What this episode was actually about was getting the Doctor blinded
and it couldn't even do that properly since just like everything
important that happens in pile of crap of a series it wasn't even
shown happening but refereed to in retrospect after it occurred off
screen.
This has got to be one of the most amateurish and abysmally written
series ever. No wonder hardly anyone is watching it anymore.
Moffat must have had a mental breakdown because he totally ruined
Sherlock as well [as seen by the ratings and the scathing reviews in
the press like the Daily Mail. "Do BBC bigwigs give a fig about
viewers? After enduring the shocking self-indulgent (and much-hyped)
Sherlock finale, our exasperated TV critic says he never wants to
watch such appalling claptrap ever again"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4122872/After-enduring-shocking-self-indulgent-hyped-Sherlock-finale-exasperated-TV-critic-asks-BBC-bigwigs-fig-viewers.html
]
Oh well, if we're basing on how good a story is on how it's been
reviewed by a ragmag, then see
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-reviews/doctor-who-oxygen-review-10415380
"A claustrophobic treat of an episode." "So yes. Good episode, well done
team."
I'll stick with the Daily Mail and not some idiot courtier playing along
and adding to the sophistry that the the emperor's invisible birthday
suit is real.

A blind man rewiring and reprogramming a nuclear reactor with space
gloves? Are you for real????????
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
about trying to be scientifically accurate and spoon-feeding people like
you. It was designed to appeal to a contemporary audience. You might not
have appreciated the modern references to things like Facebook and
tweeting. Those of us who are not quite as autistic as yourself did and
we could appreciate both the futuristic setting as well as the more
interesting and more relevant subtext.
So that's the new PC loony insult is it. Call anyone who criticises
the author's total inability to write credible and believable
characterisation and relationships or convey emotions properly, and
his totally irrational, illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist
plot, autistic. What a total load of crap.
If the cap fits...
A blind man rewiring and reprogramming a nuclear reactor with space
gloves? Are you for real????????

You do realise that the emperor is stark naked don't you?
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
That you missed all this is your loss. Sorry.
Just look at the ratings for this ridiculous episode. 3.57 million.
The lowest they have ever been.
Is everyone that turned off or the the other side because of writer's
total inability to write credible and believable characterisation and
relationships or convey emotions properly, and his totally irrational,
illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist plot, when they have seen
all of these things done properly by authors such as Edgar Rice
Burrougs, E. E. Smith, Alexandre Dumas, Homer, Robert Louis
Stephenson, Hugh Lofting, Frank Herbert and H. G. Wells, autistic as
well?
Oh - so you have a minute by minute breakdown? You know viewers who
started watching started turning off?
I have seen the ratings and the show 3.57m viewers watched Doctor Who, 8
million watched the parts of Eurovision than didn't clash with BGT and
3.6m watched Pointless Celebrities which was on before Doctor Who and
Eurovision.
Post by The Other Doctor
And, well bloody hell. If those are the authors you consider modern
writers should try to emulate then it's no wonder you've got problems
with Doctor Who.
Yes, I agree they wrote very good stories which were and still are
extremely popular.
Post by The Other Doctor
So tell me, Aggy - when did you last enjoy a SF film at the cinema, or a
SF episode on TV - of any show?
Rogue One: A Star Wars Story was brilliant. In fact it was even better
than The Force Awakens.
The Other Doctor
2017-05-14 21:28:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
Aww. How cute. AI could stand for Actual Idiot, in which case "clearly not
written by" is a self evident error.
AI stands for Artificial Intelligence and the fact that you think I
could have been using it any differently proves that the actual idiot
is you.
Um, no Aggy, you do have a tendency to act like an idiot.
You are totally deranged.
Post by The Other Doctor
For instance, you watched Oxygen and took the whole thing completely
literally. So you missed what it was all about. It wasn't all about
trying to do a realistic, hard SF adventure. It was about mixing in
political observation, where a "suit" had a double meaning. It wasn't
It was nothing of the kind since it failed to concentrate a plot,
story and characterisation involving any of these issues and only
brings them up as oblique references and jokes made by the Doctor.
There were no individual characters developed in this story at all.
The works acting as nothing more than a chorus to the Doctor's jokes
and ridiculous speakers and Bill was nothing more than the Doctor's
tin dog K9 Mk.IV and Nardole his pet parrot Polynesia.
What this episode was actually about was getting the Doctor blinded
and it couldn't even do that properly since just like everything
important that happens in pile of crap of a series it wasn't even
shown happening but refereed to in retrospect after it occurred off
screen.
This has got to be one of the most amateurish and abysmally written
series ever. No wonder hardly anyone is watching it anymore.
Moffat must have had a mental breakdown because he totally ruined
Sherlock as well [as seen by the ratings and the scathing reviews in
the press like the Daily Mail. "Do BBC bigwigs give a fig about
viewers? After enduring the shocking self-indulgent (and much-hyped)
Sherlock finale, our exasperated TV critic says he never wants to
watch such appalling claptrap ever again"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4122872/After-enduring-shocking-self-indulgent-hyped-Sherlock-finale-exasperated-TV-critic-asks-BBC-bigwigs-fig-viewers.html
]
Oh well, if we're basing on how good a story is on how it's been
reviewed by a ragmag, then see
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-reviews/doctor-who-oxygen-review-10415380
"A claustrophobic treat of an episode." "So yes. Good episode, well done
team."
I'll stick with the Daily Mail and not some idiot courtier playing along
and adding to the sophistry that the the emperor's invisible birthday
suit is real.
A blind man rewiring and reprogramming a nuclear reactor with space
gloves? Are you for real????????
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
about trying to be scientifically accurate and spoon-feeding people like
you. It was designed to appeal to a contemporary audience. You might not
have appreciated the modern references to things like Facebook and
tweeting. Those of us who are not quite as autistic as yourself did and
we could appreciate both the futuristic setting as well as the more
interesting and more relevant subtext.
So that's the new PC loony insult is it. Call anyone who criticises
the author's total inability to write credible and believable
characterisation and relationships or convey emotions properly, and
his totally irrational, illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist
plot, autistic. What a total load of crap.
If the cap fits...
A blind man rewiring and reprogramming a nuclear reactor with space
gloves? Are you for real????????
You do realise that the emperor is stark naked don't you?
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
That you missed all this is your loss. Sorry.
Just look at the ratings for this ridiculous episode. 3.57 million.
The lowest they have ever been.
Is everyone that turned off or the the other side because of writer's
total inability to write credible and believable characterisation and
relationships or convey emotions properly, and his totally irrational,
illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist plot, when they have seen
all of these things done properly by authors such as Edgar Rice
Burrougs, E. E. Smith, Alexandre Dumas, Homer, Robert Louis
Stephenson, Hugh Lofting, Frank Herbert and H. G. Wells, autistic as
well?
Oh - so you have a minute by minute breakdown? You know viewers who
started watching started turning off?O
I have seen the ratings and the show 3.57m viewers watched Doctor Who, 8
million watched the parts of Eurovision than didn't clash with BGT and
3.6m watched Pointless Celebrities which was on before Doctor Who and
Eurovision.
Post by The Other Doctor
And, well bloody hell. If those are the authors you consider modern
writers should try to emulate then it's no wonder you've got problems
with Doctor Who.
Yes, I agree they wrote very good stories which were and still are
extremely popular.
For the time. And even then, many were not well received. SF was not
seen as a genre that could be taken seriously. Doctor Dolittle. No
wonder you like it so much - a story written for children. About a man
who could talk to animals. And you're complaining about a blind man
programming a computer! Get a grip.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
So tell me, Aggy - when did you last enjoy a SF film at the cinema, or a
SF episode on TV - of any show?
Rogue One: A Star Wars Story was brilliant. In fact it was even better
than The Force Awakens.
You reckon? Another film about the Death Star. The pain of watching a
CGI recreation of Peter Cushing. The bouncing around between multiple
planets. Trying to keep track of all the new characters (most of whom
were only created in order to be killed off). The love affair between
Jyn and Cassian that never came across as believable.

Nothing more than another generic action movie which only seemed
exciting because it took place in the Star Wars universe. Talk about the
Emperor's New Clothes!
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 22:09:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
Aww. How cute. AI could stand for Actual Idiot, in which case "clearly not
written by" is a self evident error.
AI stands for Artificial Intelligence and the fact that you think I
could have been using it any differently proves that the actual idiot
is you.
Um, no Aggy, you do have a tendency to act like an idiot.
You are totally deranged.
Post by The Other Doctor
For instance, you watched Oxygen and took the whole thing completely
literally. So you missed what it was all about. It wasn't all about
trying to do a realistic, hard SF adventure. It was about mixing in
political observation, where a "suit" had a double meaning. It wasn't
It was nothing of the kind since it failed to concentrate a plot,
story and characterisation involving any of these issues and only
brings them up as oblique references and jokes made by the Doctor.
There were no individual characters developed in this story at all.
The works acting as nothing more than a chorus to the Doctor's jokes
and ridiculous speakers and Bill was nothing more than the Doctor's
tin dog K9 Mk.IV and Nardole his pet parrot Polynesia.
What this episode was actually about was getting the Doctor blinded
and it couldn't even do that properly since just like everything
important that happens in pile of crap of a series it wasn't even
shown happening but refereed to in retrospect after it occurred off
screen.
This has got to be one of the most amateurish and abysmally written
series ever. No wonder hardly anyone is watching it anymore.
Moffat must have had a mental breakdown because he totally ruined
Sherlock as well [as seen by the ratings and the scathing reviews in
the press like the Daily Mail. "Do BBC bigwigs give a fig about
viewers? After enduring the shocking self-indulgent (and much-hyped)
Sherlock finale, our exasperated TV critic says he never wants to
watch such appalling claptrap ever again"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4122872/After-enduring-shocking-self-indulgent-hyped-Sherlock-finale-exasperated-TV-critic-asks-BBC-bigwigs-fig-viewers.html
]
Oh well, if we're basing on how good a story is on how it's been
reviewed by a ragmag, then see
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-reviews/doctor-who-oxygen-review-10415380
"A claustrophobic treat of an episode." "So yes. Good episode, well done
team."
I'll stick with the Daily Mail and not some idiot courtier playing
along and adding to the sophistry that the the emperor's invisible
birthday suit is real.
A blind man rewiring and reprogramming a nuclear reactor with space
gloves? Are you for real????????
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
about trying to be scientifically accurate and spoon-feeding people like
you. It was designed to appeal to a contemporary audience. You might not
have appreciated the modern references to things like Facebook and
tweeting. Those of us who are not quite as autistic as yourself did and
we could appreciate both the futuristic setting as well as the more
interesting and more relevant subtext.
So that's the new PC loony insult is it. Call anyone who criticises
the author's total inability to write credible and believable
characterisation and relationships or convey emotions properly, and
his totally irrational, illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist
plot, autistic. What a total load of crap.
If the cap fits...
A blind man rewiring and reprogramming a nuclear reactor with space
gloves? Are you for real????????
You do realise that the emperor is stark naked don't you?
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
That you missed all this is your loss. Sorry.
Just look at the ratings for this ridiculous episode. 3.57 million.
The lowest they have ever been.
Is everyone that turned off or the the other side because of writer's
total inability to write credible and believable characterisation and
relationships or convey emotions properly, and his totally irrational,
illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist plot, when they have seen
all of these things done properly by authors such as Edgar Rice
Burrougs, E. E. Smith, Alexandre Dumas, Homer, Robert Louis
Stephenson, Hugh Lofting, Frank Herbert and H. G. Wells, autistic as
well?
Oh - so you have a minute by minute breakdown? You know viewers who
started watching started turning off?O
I have seen the ratings and the show 3.57m viewers watched Doctor Who,
8 million watched the parts of Eurovision than didn't clash with BGT
and 3.6m watched Pointless Celebrities which was on before Doctor Who
and Eurovision.
Post by The Other Doctor
And, well bloody hell. If those are the authors you consider modern
writers should try to emulate then it's no wonder you've got problems
with Doctor Who.
Yes, I agree they wrote very good stories which were and still are
extremely popular.
For the time. And even then, many were not well received. SF was not
seen as a genre that could be taken seriously. Doctor Dolittle. No
wonder you like it so much - a story written for children. About a man
who could talk to animals. And you're complaining about a blind man
programming a computer! Get a grip.
If you've actually read the books you would realise from the
introduction alone that the Doctor's companion who wrote the stories up
was probably suffering from dementia. Nothing like a blind man
reprogramming a computer.
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
So tell me, Aggy - when did you last enjoy a SF film at the cinema, or a
SF episode on TV - of any show?
Rogue One: A Star Wars Story was brilliant. In fact it was even better
than The Force Awakens.
You reckon? Another film about the Death Star. The pain of watching a
Ah yes, the Death Star which George Lucas pinched from Triplanatary and
Galactic Patrol (along with most of the plot of A New Hope), and Star
Killer Base which J. J. Abrams pinched from Second State Lensmen and
Children of the Lens.

So you see these stories are still relevant and influential even today
over 50 years after E. E. Smith died.
Post by The Other Doctor
CGI recreation of Peter Cushing. The bouncing around between multiple
The CGI Cushing worked quite well. What I'm wondering about is where
they got his dialogue from?
Post by The Other Doctor
planets. Trying to keep track of all the new characters (most of whom
were only created in order to be killed off). The love affair between
At least they had characterisation and backstory unlike the cardboard
cutouts which form Peter Capladi's chorus.
Post by The Other Doctor
Jyn and Cassian that never came across as believable.
It was believable to me unlike the ridiculous relationship between the
Doctor and Rose.
Post by The Other Doctor
Nothing more than another generic action movie which only seemed
exciting because it took place in the Star Wars universe. Talk about the
Emperor's New Clothes!
Most people think is was better than any of the prequels and most of
those think it was better than The Force Awakens.
The Doctor
2017-05-14 23:10:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
Aww. How cute. AI could stand for Actual Idiot, in which case "clearly not
written by" is a self evident error.
AI stands for Artificial Intelligence and the fact that you think I
could have been using it any differently proves that the actual idiot
is you.
Um, no Aggy, you do have a tendency to act like an idiot.
You are totally deranged.
Post by The Other Doctor
For instance, you watched Oxygen and took the whole thing completely
literally. So you missed what it was all about. It wasn't all about
trying to do a realistic, hard SF adventure. It was about mixing in
political observation, where a "suit" had a double meaning. It wasn't
It was nothing of the kind since it failed to concentrate a plot,
story and characterisation involving any of these issues and only
brings them up as oblique references and jokes made by the Doctor.
There were no individual characters developed in this story at all.
The works acting as nothing more than a chorus to the Doctor's jokes
and ridiculous speakers and Bill was nothing more than the Doctor's
tin dog K9 Mk.IV and Nardole his pet parrot Polynesia.
What this episode was actually about was getting the Doctor blinded
and it couldn't even do that properly since just like everything
important that happens in pile of crap of a series it wasn't even
shown happening but refereed to in retrospect after it occurred off
screen.
This has got to be one of the most amateurish and abysmally written
series ever. No wonder hardly anyone is watching it anymore.
Moffat must have had a mental breakdown because he totally ruined
Sherlock as well [as seen by the ratings and the scathing reviews in
the press like the Daily Mail. "Do BBC bigwigs give a fig about
viewers? After enduring the shocking self-indulgent (and much-hyped)
Sherlock finale, our exasperated TV critic says he never wants to
watch such appalling claptrap ever again"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4122872/After-enduring-shocking-self-indulgent-hyped-Sherlock-finale-exasperated-TV-critic-asks-BBC-bigwigs-fig-viewers.html
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
]
Oh well, if we're basing on how good a story is on how it's been
reviewed by a ragmag, then see
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-reviews/doctor-who-oxygen-review-10415380
"A claustrophobic treat of an episode." "So yes. Good episode, well done
team."
I'll stick with the Daily Mail and not some idiot courtier playing along
and adding to the sophistry that the the emperor's invisible birthday
suit is real.
A blind man rewiring and reprogramming a nuclear reactor with space
gloves? Are you for real????????
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
about trying to be scientifically accurate and spoon-feeding people like
you. It was designed to appeal to a contemporary audience. You might not
have appreciated the modern references to things like Facebook and
tweeting. Those of us who are not quite as autistic as yourself did and
we could appreciate both the futuristic setting as well as the more
interesting and more relevant subtext.
So that's the new PC loony insult is it. Call anyone who criticises
the author's total inability to write credible and believable
characterisation and relationships or convey emotions properly, and
his totally irrational, illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist
plot, autistic. What a total load of crap.
If the cap fits...
A blind man rewiring and reprogramming a nuclear reactor with space
gloves? Are you for real????????
You do realise that the emperor is stark naked don't you?
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
That you missed all this is your loss. Sorry.
Just look at the ratings for this ridiculous episode. 3.57 million.
The lowest they have ever been.
Is everyone that turned off or the the other side because of writer's
total inability to write credible and believable characterisation and
relationships or convey emotions properly, and his totally irrational,
illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist plot, when they have seen
all of these things done properly by authors such as Edgar Rice
Burrougs, E. E. Smith, Alexandre Dumas, Homer, Robert Louis
Stephenson, Hugh Lofting, Frank Herbert and H. G. Wells, autistic as
well?
Oh - so you have a minute by minute breakdown? You know viewers who
started watching started turning off?
I have seen the ratings and the show 3.57m viewers watched Doctor Who, 8
million watched the parts of Eurovision than didn't clash with BGT and
3.6m watched Pointless Celebrities which was on before Doctor Who and
Eurovision.
Post by The Other Doctor
And, well bloody hell. If those are the authors you consider modern
writers should try to emulate then it's no wonder you've got problems
with Doctor Who.
Yes, I agree they wrote very good stories which were and still are
extremely popular.
Post by The Other Doctor
So tell me, Aggy - when did you last enjoy a SF film at the cinema, or a
SF episode on TV - of any show?
Rogue One: A Star Wars Story was brilliant. In fact it was even better
than The Force Awakens.
I still look forward to SW E8 .
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 23:05:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
Aww. How cute. AI could stand for Actual Idiot, in which case "clearly not
written by" is a self evident error.
AI stands for Artificial Intelligence and the fact that you think I
could have been using it any differently proves that the actual idiot
is you.
Um, no Aggy, you do have a tendency to act like an idiot.
You are totally deranged.
Post by The Other Doctor
For instance, you watched Oxygen and took the whole thing completely
literally. So you missed what it was all about. It wasn't all about
trying to do a realistic, hard SF adventure. It was about mixing in
political observation, where a "suit" had a double meaning. It wasn't
It was nothing of the kind since it failed to concentrate a plot, story
and characterisation involving any of these issues and only brings them
up as oblique references and jokes made by the Doctor. There were no
individual characters developed in this story at all. The works acting
as nothing more than a chorus to the Doctor's jokes and ridiculous
speakers and Bill was nothing more than the Doctor's tin dog K9 Mk.IV
and Nardole his pet parrot Polynesia.
What this episode was actually about was getting the Doctor blinded and
it couldn't even do that properly since just like everything important
that happens in pile of crap of a series it wasn't even shown happening
but refereed to in retrospect after it occurred off screen.
This has got to be one of the most amateurish and abysmally written
series ever. No wonder hardly anyone is watching it anymore.
Moffat must have had a mental breakdown because he totally ruined
Sherlock as well [as seen by the ratings and the scathing reviews in the
press like the Daily Mail. "Do BBC bigwigs give a fig about viewers?
After enduring the shocking self-indulgent (and much-hyped) Sherlock
finale, our exasperated TV critic says he never wants to watch such
appalling claptrap ever again"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4122872/After-enduring-shocking-self-indulgent-hyped-Sherlock-finale-exasperated-TV-critic-asks-BBC-bigwigs-fig-viewers.html
Post by Agamemnon
]
Oh well, if we're basing on how good a story is on how it's been
reviewed by a ragmag, then see
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-reviews/doctor-who-oxygen-review-10415380
"A claustrophobic treat of an episode." "So yes. Good episode, well done
team."
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
about trying to be scientifically accurate and spoon-feeding people like
you. It was designed to appeal to a contemporary audience. You might not
have appreciated the modern references to things like Facebook and
tweeting. Those of us who are not quite as autistic as yourself did and
we could appreciate both the futuristic setting as well as the more
interesting and more relevant subtext.
So that's the new PC loony insult is it. Call anyone who criticises the
author's total inability to write credible and believable
characterisation and relationships or convey emotions properly, and his
totally irrational, illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist plot,
autistic. What a total load of crap.
If the cap fits...
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
That you missed all this is your loss. Sorry.
Just look at the ratings for this ridiculous episode. 3.57 million. The
lowest they have ever been.
Is everyone that turned off or the the other side because of writer's
total inability to write credible and believable characterisation and
relationships or convey emotions properly, and his totally irrational,
illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist plot, when they have seen all
of these things done properly by authors such as Edgar Rice Burrougs, E.
E. Smith, Alexandre Dumas, Homer, Robert Louis Stephenson, Hugh Lofting,
Frank Herbert and H. G. Wells, autistic as well?
Oh - so you have a minute by minute breakdown? You know viewers who
started watching started turning off?
And, well bloody hell. If those are the authors you consider modern
writers should try to emulate then it's no wonder you've got problems
with Doctor Who.
So tell me, Aggy - when did you last enjoy a SF film at the cinema, or a
SF episode on TV - of any show?
We can wait forever for a rational answer.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 23:05:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
Aww. How cute. AI could stand for Actual Idiot, in which case "clearly not
written by" is a self evident error.
AI stands for Artificial Intelligence and the fact that you think I
could have been using it any differently proves that the actual idiot
is you.
Um, no Aggy, you do have a tendency to act like an idiot.
You are totally deranged.
The usual.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
For instance, you watched Oxygen and took the whole thing completely
literally. So you missed what it was all about. It wasn't all about
trying to do a realistic, hard SF adventure. It was about mixing in
political observation, where a "suit" had a double meaning. It wasn't
It was nothing of the kind since it failed to concentrate a plot, story
and characterisation involving any of these issues and only brings them
up as oblique references and jokes made by the Doctor. There were no
individual characters developed in this story at all. The works acting
as nothing more than a chorus to the Doctor's jokes and ridiculous
speakers and Bill was nothing more than the Doctor's tin dog K9 Mk.IV
and Nardole his pet parrot Polynesia.
What this episode was actually about was getting the Doctor blinded and
it couldn't even do that properly since just like everything important
that happens in pile of crap of a series it wasn't even shown happening
but refereed to in retrospect after it occurred off screen.
This has got to be one of the most amateurish and abysmally written
series ever. No wonder hardly anyone is watching it anymore.
Moffat must have had a mental breakdown because he totally ruined
Sherlock as well [as seen by the ratings and the scathing reviews in the
press like the Daily Mail. "Do BBC bigwigs give a fig about viewers?
After enduring the shocking self-indulgent (and much-hyped) Sherlock
finale, our exasperated TV critic says he never wants to watch such
appalling claptrap ever again"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4122872/After-enduring-shocking-self-indulgent-hyped-Sherlock-finale-exasperated-TV-critic-asks-BBC-bigwigs-fig-viewers.html
]
Yet Sherlock is popular worldwide.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Other Doctor
about trying to be scientifically accurate and spoon-feeding people like
you. It was designed to appeal to a contemporary audience. You might not
have appreciated the modern references to things like Facebook and
tweeting. Those of us who are not quite as autistic as yourself did and
we could appreciate both the futuristic setting as well as the more
interesting and more relevant subtext.
So that's the new PC loony insult is it. Call anyone who criticises the
author's total inability to write credible and believable
characterisation and relationships or convey emotions properly, and his
totally irrational, illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist plot,
autistic. What a total load of crap.
Post by The Other Doctor
That you missed all this is your loss. Sorry.
Just look at the ratings for this ridiculous episode. 3.57 million. The
lowest they have ever been.
Is everyone that turned off or the the other side because of writer's
total inability to write credible and believable characterisation and
relationships or convey emotions properly, and his totally irrational,
illogical and unbelievable sentimentalist plot, when they have seen all
of these things done properly by authors such as Edgar Rice Burrougs, E.
E. Smith, Alexandre Dumas, Homer, Robert Louis Stephenson, Hugh Lofting,
Frank Herbert and H. G. Wells, autistic as well?
#.57 million is not the fianl number.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 23:02:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Other Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
Aww. How cute. AI could stand for Actual Idiot, in which case "clearly not
written by" is a self evident error.
AI stands for Artificial Intelligence and the fact that you think I
could have been using it any differently proves that the actual idiot is
you.
Um, no Aggy, you do have a tendency to act like an idiot.
For instance, you watched Oxygen and took the whole thing completely
literally. So you missed what it was all about. It wasn't all about
trying to do a realistic, hard SF adventure. It was about mixing in
political observation, where a "suit" had a double meaning. It wasn't
about trying to be scientifically accurate and spoon-feeding people like
you. It was designed to appeal to a contemporary audience. You might not
have appreciated the modern references to things like Facebook and
tweeting. Those of us who are not quite as autistic as yourself did and
we could appreciate both the futuristic setting as well as the more
interesting and more relevant subtext.
That you missed all this is your loss. Sorry.
Roasting Ag is like roasting Anti-McCoyers.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:37:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
Aww. How cute. AI could stand for Actual Idiot, in which case "clearly not
written by" is a self evident error.
However, the facts not in evidence are that you ever use your brain. Your
prejudices seem to prevent its effective operation.
Overruled.

You choices are

Margaret Thatcher V2 a la Theresa MAy

Impotence in the form of Jeremy Corbyn

Brexit regret n the form of Tim Farron

Instability in the form of Nicola Sturgeon

Lunacy in the form of Plaid Cymru.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Tim Bruening
2017-05-15 02:12:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
Aww. How cute. AI could stand for Actual Idiot, in which case "clearly not
written by" is a self evident error.
However, the facts not in evidence are that you ever use your brain. Your
prejudices seem to prevent its effective operation.
Overruled.
You choices are
Margaret Thatcher V2 a la Theresa MAy
Impotence in the form of Jeremy Corbyn
Brexit regret n the form of Tim Farron
Instability in the form of Nicola Sturgeon
Lunacy in the form of Plaid Cymru.
Can I vote Green?
Agamemnon
2017-05-15 03:25:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
Aww. How cute. AI could stand for Actual Idiot, in which case "clearly not
written by" is a self evident error.
However, the facts not in evidence are that you ever use your brain. Your
prejudices seem to prevent its effective operation.
Overruled.
You choices are
Margaret Thatcher V2 a la Theresa MAy
Impotence in the form of Jeremy Corbyn
Brexit regret n the form of Tim Farron
Instability in the form of Nicola Sturgeon
Lunacy in the form of Plaid Cymru.
Can I vote Green?
Can someone please bring back the SDP!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:28:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Given that what I wrote was clearly not written by an AI all that
statement proves is your lack of intelligence.
You are overruled 5:1 against!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:27:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Post by Agamemnon
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man.
Objection, your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.
Overruled.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:26:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Coca Cola Kid
Really? What's there to stop the workers quitting and going to work for a
different company that offers better working conditions?
The fact that they are already in a very remote location and by this point
are at the mercy of the company as to whether they can come or go would put
a huge dent in that. And before you whinge again about them choosing to
work for that company in the first place, there are a number of factors
which could cause them not to know in advance.
The moron that wrote this script clearly doesn't have a fucking clue how
capitalism works.
Or, more likely, he and other writers this season are focusing on the
excesses and abuses of Capitalism, which morons who have a naïve and
idealistic view of turn a blind eye to. If you think that they are making
straw man arguments, then it is fair enough to discuss and call that out in
each case, but the fact that you make it so vitriolic and personal suggests
that you are a reactionary defending an idea as if it were a religion.
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
The governments of so-called developed countries are full of checks and
balances, yet they are often circumvented without significant consequence.
Things like this do happen in the real world, unlike in the vacuum of
idealism where both Capitalism and Communism exist.
They don't apply to work for that employer in the first place, especially
one with such a bad reputation. Only the scum of society would work for an
employer like that and they wouldn't tolerate being treated like shit.
They'd be out to kill their bosses at the first opportunity and take their
jobs themselves, especially since murder seems to no longer be a crime.
Why are you assuming that the company had a bad reputation? Assuming that
this had happened before with this company (which we do not know - things
may have changed), the deaths were mostly likely reported as accidents.
Miners know that there are significant risks when they take the job.
How easily could you change your job?
How much do you take for granted that you can easily change your job? For
many people, whether they are living paycheck to paycheck or are stuck in
the inner cities or the Applachians, they do not have that luxury. Or they
do not know that they have that luxury because they have been conditioned
over time into believing that they do not.
Post by Tim Bruening
The anti-trust laws must have been eliminated along with the labor
unions, lawyers, and worker safety regulations. I'm assuming that
Trump played a big role in the above.
Really?
I cannot tell whether Timmy was being facetious or sarcastic, but the point
is that people like Trump do want to significantly weaken those protections
and regulations
Post by Tim Bruening
The checks and balances came about because of worker activism. They
could be eliminated if the corporations become really dominant.
Yer right. And murder and corporate manslaughter are no longer crimes
either. What sort of society is this? One run by the mafia? See above to
see how disrespected workers deal with their bosses in a lawless mafia
state. They don't get to live long. Read E E Smith's Lensman series.
Abuses and atrocities like this usually go on for a long time, bubbling
under the surface, before they come to a head and people revolt. And even
after such revolts occur, in the long term it's like a pendulum.
Collectively, humans have a short memory.
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why does Nardole need a space suit when he's a robot?
I understand that he's a cyborg, so would still need air.
He admired in this episode that we was an AI just like the one on the ship.
I did not notice this. At which point in the episode was this line?
Post by Tim Bruening
The spacesuits aren't as smart as humans.
Then why kill off the humans? Why not just sack the workers and replace
them.
Use your brain, man. There must be some financial motivation to it. If
oxygen is so expensive, then it would be more profitable to kill the
inefficient and demoralised workers off (and presumably collect insurance
money for the "accident"), rather than waste oxygen on bringing them back
from their remote work site.
3x post?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 12:22:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Why would a company treat its workers with such disregard for health and
safety when any firm of lawyers would jump at the chance to sue them for
every last penny they posses?
I surmise that labor unions have been abolished and limits placed on lawyers.
Capitalism is full of checks and balances.
Post by Agamemnon
If you don't treat your workers well then they will go and work for
someone else.
How can the workers change jobs if they are out in the asteroid belt?
How easily could you change your job?
And if there isn't someone else to work for then that's a
Post by Agamemnon
monopoly and against the laws of free competition and therefore
equivalent to communism. So why wasn't this company being run by
communists?
The anti-trust laws must have been eliminated along with the labor
unions, lawyers, and worker safety regulations. I'm assuming that Trump
played a big role in the above.
The checks and balances came about because of worker activism. They
could be eliminated if the corporations become really dominant.
Post by Agamemnon
Why does Nardole need a space suit when he's a robot?
I understand that he's a cyborg, so would still need air.
Why didn't he give
Post by Agamemnon
his suit to Bill and save the Doctor being blinded?
Why if the suits are able to do the work alone did they ever need to
bring humans onto the station.
The spacesuits aren't as smart as humans.
Why is it being run by complete and utter
Post by Agamemnon
incompetents who don't have access to fail safe mechanisms and life boat
capsules.
See my paragraph above about the eliminations of unions, worker safety regs, etc.
Have a nice wrestling match.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Andrew M
2017-05-13 23:59:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
The Doctor is blinded and he's able to rewire and reprogramme a nuclear
reactor control system, one that he's never ever seen before?
A keyboard is a keyboard. If you can touch-type you can write a program
Post by Agamemnon
Moffat is totally out of his mind.
What was the point of parodying the Star Trek, "Space - the Final
Frontier" voice over only for Capaldi to make a complete and utter fool
of himself doing it?
Once again a bunch morons are sent out into space, on a mining ship,
without any training and no clue whatsoever how to do anything in
accordance with health and safety regulations which look to be totally
non-existent in any case.
Yes they do have training. If you had actually watched this episode you
would know that. The opening scene tells you that these people are
trained if you just open your ears and listen. Pretty much every scene
where the remaining four crew members are involved tells you that they
are trained.
Post by Agamemnon
You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when lecturing about
what happens if someone is exposed to empty space without a suit and
then it turning out that he's lecturing about the wrong subject.
Totally amateurish foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at the start.
Rather than write a proper relationship letting it progress and then
killing of the he has her say 'I want to have your children' to the man
and then she's killed off. Terrible writing. Absolutely terrible. Why
should I give a damn about either of them when the writer hasn't
properly introduced their characters to the audience and built them up
in advance?
Because we're not on the autistic spectrum?
Post by Agamemnon
The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script is in
completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks everyone watching
can read his mind and connect the missing back story in between the
lines.
Well I did. It wasn't that hard.
Post by Agamemnon
How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees without any
consequences? This series is a complete and utter joke.
My great-great Grandad was a railway surfaceman in the 1880s. He died
when he was run over by a train. His death was recorded in the local
paper which also noted that another surfaceman had died in much the
same place two weeks earlier. There was no police investigation . The
raliway company's entire report into his death reads "Company servant.
Want of care". They didn't murder him, but neither did they care
whether he lived or died. Nor did the authorities. At what point does
one become the other?
Post by Agamemnon
Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a pantomime with
loony left politically motivated script writing plummeting to the
depths of the Sylvester McCoy era and even lower still.
You think that leftist views began with McCoy? Really? Actually they're
pretty much absent from McCoy's stint. Try going back further. Look
particularly at the stories written by Malcom Hulke for the Pertwee and
Tom Baker
Post by Agamemnon
If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next 8
episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.
6/10 for entertainment
It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a 'plot'
became impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed to have
exchanged space suits with Bill and been blinded, none of which was
actually shown.
How was that "hard to follow"? I got it. Most people would, I am sure,
"get it". What I really don't get is your problem here. I have a
hearing problem. If words are not clearly enunciated or if there is a
lot of background noise, I don't hear them. I understood exactly what
had happened from the spoken word. Why is that so hard for you?
Post by Agamemnon
1/10 for scriptwriting
Complete and utter garbage.
How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you are wearing
a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being used when their were
on the ship.
They were wearing the suits and the suits contained communication
systems. The first scene told you that
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for the air
you need to breath and do your job properly?
You mean like paying for the tools you need to mine coal or ore? People
have done that in the past
Post by Agamemnon
Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily find on
the planet instead of gold or platinum?
Because at this time all the mineable deposits of all these things have
become depleted on Earth? Because a new use for copper has been found
that makes it especially vauable? More likely this mining mission is on
the borders of profitability, which is why the Doctor's gambit works.
It's a venture thatmakes a little bit of money but not a huge amount.
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill the people
wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?
It's software. I'm pretty sure people don't design computers that can
be locked up by ransomware, but if there's a back door, especially one
which doesn't identify the person activating it.... Why wuld anyone
wear one? Just a guess - maybe the company didn't let them in on the
whole "Your suit will kill you" thing
Post by Agamemnon
A total fucking utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
Aggie, you remind me of a manager I once had. He saw things in really
black and white terms. You were either great at your job, and he could
see nothing but good in what you did. Or you were shit at your job and
he could see nothing but bad in what you did. He was f***king useless
as a manager because he couldn't see shades of grey. I always suspected
he was on the spectrum somewhere.

Your "reviews" remind me of him. You're a shit critic because you've
made up your mind before you watch the episode that you're not going to
like it. Do yourself a favour. Stop watching. You remind me of another
poster who was here a while back - Ignis Fatuus. Anything that wasn't
Hartnell was flawed.
The Doctor
2017-05-14 00:31:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
The Doctor is blinded and he's able to rewire and reprogramme a nuclear
reactor control system, one that he's never ever seen before?
A keyboard is a keyboard. If you can touch-type you can write a program
Post by Agamemnon
Moffat is totally out of his mind.
What was the point of parodying the Star Trek, "Space - the Final
Frontier" voice over only for Capaldi to make a complete and utter fool
of himself doing it?
Once again a bunch morons are sent out into space, on a mining ship,
without any training and no clue whatsoever how to do anything in
accordance with health and safety regulations which look to be totally
non-existent in any case.
Yes they do have training. If you had actually watched this episode you
would know that. The opening scene tells you that these people are
trained if you just open your ears and listen. Pretty much every scene
where the remaining four crew members are involved tells you that they
are trained.
Post by Agamemnon
You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when lecturing about
what happens if someone is exposed to empty space without a suit and
then it turning out that he's lecturing about the wrong subject.
Totally amateurish foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at the start.
Rather than write a proper relationship letting it progress and then
killing of the he has her say 'I want to have your children' to the man
and then she's killed off. Terrible writing. Absolutely terrible. Why
should I give a damn about either of them when the writer hasn't
properly introduced their characters to the audience and built them up
in advance?
Because we're not on the autistic spectrum?
Post by Agamemnon
The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script is in
completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks everyone watching
can read his mind and connect the missing back story in between the
lines.
Well I did. It wasn't that hard.
Post by Agamemnon
How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees without any
consequences? This series is a complete and utter joke.
My great-great Grandad was a railway surfaceman in the 1880s. He died
when he was run over by a train. His death was recorded in the local
paper which also noted that another surfaceman had died in much the
same place two weeks earlier. There was no police investigation . The
raliway company's entire report into his death reads "Company servant.
Want of care". They didn't murder him, but neither did they care
whether he lived or died. Nor did the authorities. At what point does
one become the other?
Post by Agamemnon
Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a pantomime with
loony left politically motivated script writing plummeting to the
depths of the Sylvester McCoy era and even lower still.
You think that leftist views began with McCoy? Really? Actually they're
pretty much absent from McCoy's stint. Try going back further. Look
particularly at the stories written by Malcom Hulke for the Pertwee and
Tom Baker
Post by Agamemnon
If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next 8
episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.
6/10 for entertainment
It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a 'plot'
became impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed to have
exchanged space suits with Bill and been blinded, none of which was
actually shown.
How was that "hard to follow"? I got it. Most people would, I am sure,
"get it". What I really don't get is your problem here. I have a
hearing problem. If words are not clearly enunciated or if there is a
lot of background noise, I don't hear them. I understood exactly what
had happened from the spoken word. Why is that so hard for you?
Post by Agamemnon
1/10 for scriptwriting
Complete and utter garbage.
How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you are wearing
a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being used when their were
on the ship.
They were wearing the suits and the suits contained communication
systems. The first scene told you that
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for the air
you need to breath and do your job properly?
You mean like paying for the tools you need to mine coal or ore? People
have done that in the past
Post by Agamemnon
Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily find on
the planet instead of gold or platinum?
Because at this time all the mineable deposits of all these things have
become depleted on Earth? Because a new use for copper has been found
that makes it especially vauable? More likely this mining mission is on
the borders of profitability, which is why the Doctor's gambit works.
It's a venture thatmakes a little bit of money but not a huge amount.
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill the people
wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?
It's software. I'm pretty sure people don't design computers that can
be locked up by ransomware, but if there's a back door, especially one
which doesn't identify the person activating it.... Why wuld anyone
wear one? Just a guess - maybe the company didn't let them in on the
whole "Your suit will kill you" thing
Post by Agamemnon
A total fing utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
Aggie, you remind me of a manager I once had. He saw things in really
black and white terms. You were either great at your job, and he could
see nothing but good in what you did. Or you were s**t at your job and
he could see nothing but bad in what you did. He was f***king useless
as a manager because he couldn't see shades of grey. I always suspected
he was on the spectrum somewhere.
Your "reviews" remind me of him. You're a s**t critic because you've
made up your mind before you watch the episode that you're not going to
like it. Do yourself a favour. Stop watching. You remind me of another
poster who was here a while back - Ignis Fatuus. Anything that wasn't
Hartnell was flawed.
What about my review in comparison?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Last Doctor
2017-05-14 08:49:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
The Doctor is blinded and he's able to rewire and reprogramme a nuclear
reactor control system, one that he's never ever seen before?
A keyboard is a keyboard. If you can touch-type you can write a program
Post by Agamemnon
Moffat is totally out of his mind.
What was the point of parodying the Star Trek, "Space - the Final
Frontier" voice over only for Capaldi to make a complete and utter fool
of himself doing it?
Once again a bunch morons are sent out into space, on a mining ship,
without any training and no clue whatsoever how to do anything in
accordance with health and safety regulations which look to be totally
non-existent in any case.
Yes they do have training. If you had actually watched this episode you
would know that. The opening scene tells you that these people are
trained if you just open your ears and listen. Pretty much every scene
where the remaining four crew members are involved tells you that they
are trained.
Post by Agamemnon
You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when lecturing about
what happens if someone is exposed to empty space without a suit and
then it turning out that he's lecturing about the wrong subject.
Totally amateurish foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at the start.
Rather than write a proper relationship letting it progress and then
killing of the he has her say 'I want to have your children' to the man
and then she's killed off. Terrible writing. Absolutely terrible. Why
should I give a damn about either of them when the writer hasn't
properly introduced their characters to the audience and built them up
in advance?
Because we're not on the autistic spectrum?
Post by Agamemnon
The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script is in
completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks everyone watching
can read his mind and connect the missing back story in between the
lines.
Well I did. It wasn't that hard.
Post by Agamemnon
How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees without any
consequences? This series is a complete and utter joke.
My great-great Grandad was a railway surfaceman in the 1880s. He died
when he was run over by a train. His death was recorded in the local
paper which also noted that another surfaceman had died in much the
same place two weeks earlier. There was no police investigation . The
raliway company's entire report into his death reads "Company servant.
Want of care". They didn't murder him, but neither did they care
whether he lived or died. Nor did the authorities. At what point does
one become the other?
Post by Agamemnon
Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a pantomime with
loony left politically motivated script writing plummeting to the
depths of the Sylvester McCoy era and even lower still.
You think that leftist views began with McCoy? Really? Actually they're
pretty much absent from McCoy's stint. Try going back further. Look
particularly at the stories written by Malcom Hulke for the Pertwee and
Tom Baker
Post by Agamemnon
If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next 8
episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.
6/10 for entertainment
It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a 'plot'
became impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed to have
exchanged space suits with Bill and been blinded, none of which was
actually shown.
How was that "hard to follow"? I got it. Most people would, I am sure,
"get it". What I really don't get is your problem here. I have a
hearing problem. If words are not clearly enunciated or if there is a
lot of background noise, I don't hear them. I understood exactly what
had happened from the spoken word. Why is that so hard for you?
Post by Agamemnon
1/10 for scriptwriting
Complete and utter garbage.
How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you are wearing
a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being used when their were
on the ship.
They were wearing the suits and the suits contained communication
systems. The first scene told you that
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for the air
you need to breath and do your job properly?
You mean like paying for the tools you need to mine coal or ore? People
have done that in the past
Post by Agamemnon
Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily find on
the planet instead of gold or platinum?
Because at this time all the mineable deposits of all these things have
become depleted on Earth? Because a new use for copper has been found
that makes it especially vauable? More likely this mining mission is on
the borders of profitability, which is why the Doctor's gambit works.
It's a venture thatmakes a little bit of money but not a huge amount.
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill the people
wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?
It's software. I'm pretty sure people don't design computers that can
be locked up by ransomware, but if there's a back door, especially one
which doesn't identify the person activating it.... Why wuld anyone
wear one? Just a guess - maybe the company didn't let them in on the
whole "Your suit will kill you" thing
Post by Agamemnon
A total fing utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
Aggie, you remind me of a manager I once had. He saw things in really
black and white terms. You were either great at your job, and he could
see nothing but good in what you did. Or you were s**t at your job and
he could see nothing but bad in what you did. He was f***king useless
as a manager because he couldn't see shades of grey. I always suspected
he was on the spectrum somewhere.
Your "reviews" remind me of him. You're a s**t critic because you've
made up your mind before you watch the episode that you're not going to
like it. Do yourself a favour. Stop watching. You remind me of another
poster who was here a while back - Ignis Fatuus. Anything that wasn't
Hartnell was flawed.
What about my review in comparison?
You didn't write a review Dave. You gave a rating followed by a rather
incoherent plot summary with a couple of asides.
--
Bashir: What I want to know is, out of all the stories you told me which
ones were true and which ones weren't?
Garak: My dear doctor...they're all true.
Bashir: Even the lies?
Garak: Especially the lies.
The Doctor
2017-05-14 12:25:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
The Doctor is blinded and he's able to rewire and reprogramme a nuclear
reactor control system, one that he's never ever seen before?
A keyboard is a keyboard. If you can touch-type you can write a program
Post by Agamemnon
Moffat is totally out of his mind.
What was the point of parodying the Star Trek, "Space - the Final
Frontier" voice over only for Capaldi to make a complete and utter fool
of himself doing it?
Once again a bunch morons are sent out into space, on a mining ship,
without any training and no clue whatsoever how to do anything in
accordance with health and safety regulations which look to be totally
non-existent in any case.
Yes they do have training. If you had actually watched this episode you
would know that. The opening scene tells you that these people are
trained if you just open your ears and listen. Pretty much every scene
where the remaining four crew members are involved tells you that they
are trained.
Post by Agamemnon
You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when lecturing about
what happens if someone is exposed to empty space without a suit and
then it turning out that he's lecturing about the wrong subject.
Totally amateurish foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at the start.
Rather than write a proper relationship letting it progress and then
killing of the he has her say 'I want to have your children' to the man
and then she's killed off. Terrible writing. Absolutely terrible. Why
should I give a damn about either of them when the writer hasn't
properly introduced their characters to the audience and built them up
in advance?
Because we're not on the autistic spectrum?
Post by Agamemnon
The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script is in
completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks everyone watching
can read his mind and connect the missing back story in between the
lines.
Well I did. It wasn't that hard.
Post by Agamemnon
How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees without any
consequences? This series is a complete and utter joke.
My great-great Grandad was a railway surfaceman in the 1880s. He died
when he was run over by a train. His death was recorded in the local
paper which also noted that another surfaceman had died in much the
same place two weeks earlier. There was no police investigation . The
raliway company's entire report into his death reads "Company servant.
Want of care". They didn't murder him, but neither did they care
whether he lived or died. Nor did the authorities. At what point does
one become the other?
Post by Agamemnon
Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a pantomime with
loony left politically motivated script writing plummeting to the
depths of the Sylvester McCoy era and even lower still.
You think that leftist views began with McCoy? Really? Actually they're
pretty much absent from McCoy's stint. Try going back further. Look
particularly at the stories written by Malcom Hulke for the Pertwee and
Tom Baker
Post by Agamemnon
If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next 8
episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.
6/10 for entertainment
It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a 'plot'
became impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed to have
exchanged space suits with Bill and been blinded, none of which was
actually shown.
How was that "hard to follow"? I got it. Most people would, I am sure,
"get it". What I really don't get is your problem here. I have a
hearing problem. If words are not clearly enunciated or if there is a
lot of background noise, I don't hear them. I understood exactly what
had happened from the spoken word. Why is that so hard for you?
Post by Agamemnon
1/10 for scriptwriting
Complete and utter garbage.
How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you are wearing
a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being used when their were
on the ship.
They were wearing the suits and the suits contained communication
systems. The first scene told you that
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for the air
you need to breath and do your job properly?
You mean like paying for the tools you need to mine coal or ore? People
have done that in the past
Post by Agamemnon
Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily find on
the planet instead of gold or platinum?
Because at this time all the mineable deposits of all these things have
become depleted on Earth? Because a new use for copper has been found
that makes it especially vauable? More likely this mining mission is on
the borders of profitability, which is why the Doctor's gambit works.
It's a venture thatmakes a little bit of money but not a huge amount.
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill the people
wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?
It's software. I'm pretty sure people don't design computers that can
be locked up by ransomware, but if there's a back door, especially one
which doesn't identify the person activating it.... Why wuld anyone
wear one? Just a guess - maybe the company didn't let them in on the
whole "Your suit will kill you" thing
Post by Agamemnon
A total fing utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
Aggie, you remind me of a manager I once had. He saw things in really
black and white terms. You were either great at your job, and he could
see nothing but good in what you did. Or you were s**t at your job and
he could see nothing but bad in what you did. He was f***king useless
as a manager because he couldn't see shades of grey. I always suspected
he was on the spectrum somewhere.
Your "reviews" remind me of him. You're a s**t critic because you've
made up your mind before you watch the episode that you're not going to
like it. Do yourself a favour. Stop watching. You remind me of another
poster who was here a while back - Ignis Fatuus. Anything that wasn't
Hartnell was flawed.
What about my review in comparison?
You didn't write a review Dave. You gave a rating followed by a rather
incoherent plot summary with a couple of asides.
Better than Agamemnon's rant.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 01:10:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
The Doctor is blinded and he's able to rewire and reprogramme a
nuclear reactor control system, one that he's never ever seen before?
A keyboard is a keyboard. If you can touch-type you can write a program
Last time I modified or debugged a program I needed to see the code
first so I could make changes to the right part despite the fact I can
type with my eyes closed as I have done just now, and read through the
documentation as well as needing to see which part of the IDE I was in
to do it. And we're assuming that the Doctor was able to navigate to the
relevant project code, compilers, dependencies and so on.

And let's not forget that the Doctor was typing with space gloves on.
You can't touch type with gloves on. It's ridiculous.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Moffat is totally out of his mind.
What was the point of parodying the Star Trek, "Space - the Final
Frontier" voice over only for Capaldi to make a complete and utter
fool of himself doing it?
Once again a bunch morons are sent out into space, on a mining ship,
without any training and no clue whatsoever how to do anything in
accordance with health and safety regulations which look to be totally
non-existent in any case.
Yes they do have training. If you had actually watched this episode you
would know that. The opening scene tells you that these people are
trained if you just open your ears and listen. Pretty much every scene
Trained to do what? Clearly not the job they're supposed to be doing and
if they have been trained it's obvious that they didn't actually learn
anything.
Post by Andrew M
where the remaining four crew members are involved tells you that they
are trained.
What? Every single scene these morons appear in tells you that they are
complete and utter imbeciles reacting to events as they happen and
trying to figure out what to do whereas if they had actually been
trained and learned anything they would know how to handle any
eventuality and go though a standard procedure to deal with it like
NASA/ESA astronauts do.

For example when the Doctor enters the station and claims to be to
official rescue team there should have been a standard procedure to
verify his identity and they would have instantly known him to be an
impostor if he did not react as expected to that procedure.

These people acted like complete amateurs like online gamers trying to
be military commanders without a clue how the military works or the
discipline to follow orders from their superiors.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when lecturing
about what happens if someone is exposed to empty space without a suit
and then it turning out that he's lecturing about the wrong subject.
Totally amateurish foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at the
start. Rather than write a proper relationship letting it progress and
then killing of the he has her say 'I want to have your children' to
the man and then she's killed off. Terrible writing. Absolutely
terrible. Why should I give a damn about either of them when the
writer hasn't properly introduced their characters to the audience and
built them up in advance?
Because we're not on the autistic spectrum?
Whereas the writer obviously is since he's not actually done the
character development properly. "When we get home I want to have kids
with you. Oh fuck, the radio doesn't work." The only thing that that
tells you is that the guy is a wet imbecile or a complete jerk and the
writer is even worse.

On top of that when the two of them were moving on the platforms they
were making sounds. Sound does not travel in a vacuum so why were sound
effects added for their footsteps?
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script is in
completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks everyone watching
can read his mind and connect the missing back story in between the
lines.
Well I did. It wasn't that hard.
The job of the view is not to imagine the back story that should have
been put their by the writer. It's the writer's job to put it there.

I didn't give a stuff for any of these people. The way it should have
been done properly was like in The Robots of Death where I actually
cared when people were killed by the robots.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees without any
consequences? This series is a complete and utter joke.
My great-great Grandad was a railway surfaceman in the 1880s. He died
when he was run over by a train. His death was recorded in the local
paper which also noted that another surfaceman had died in much the same
place two weeks earlier. There was no police investigation . The raliway
company's entire report into his death reads "Company servant. Want of
care". They didn't murder him, but neither did they care whether he
lived or died. Nor did the authorities. At what point does one become
the other?
This was not the 1880s. Both companies should have been sued. "Want of
care" is practically an admission of guilt of corporate manslaughter.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a pantomime with
loony left politically motivated script writing plummeting to the
depths of the Sylvester McCoy era and even lower still.
You think that leftist views began with McCoy? Really? Actually they're
pretty much absent from McCoy's stint. Try going back further. Look
particularly at the stories written by Malcom Hulke for the Pertwee and
Tom Baker
We are talking about the loony left. If you want to do a story about
corporate greed properly then look at The Sun Makers and even then these
left wing stories were never Doctor Who's best.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next 8
episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.
6/10 for entertainment
It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a 'plot'
became impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed to have
exchanged space suits with Bill and been blinded, none of which was
actually shown.
How was that "hard to follow"? I got it. Most people would, I am sure,
The showed flashes of Bill without a helmet, then with one, then without
one... then other stuff... fuck knew what was actually going on.
Post by Andrew M
"get it". What I really don't get is your problem here. I have a hearing
problem. If words are not clearly enunciated or if there is a lot of
background noise, I don't hear them. I understood exactly what had
happened from the spoken word. Why is that so hard for you?
Television is there to SHOW. If stuff that happened has to be explained
in the dialogue then the writer has failed. Even worse is if entire
scenes have to be narrated by the protagonists rather than actually
filmed. It felt like the early 90s reconstruction of Shada where Tom
Baker was brought in to narrate all the missing sections which were
never filmed because of a loony left strike at the BBC in 1979. But at
least the video was supplied with a copy of Douglas Addams' script so
you could read everything that went on. What was there here? Nothing.

How did the Doctor get blinded? By what? Why didn't Nardole give his
suit to Bill since he's a robot and robot's don't need air. Why was he
even wearing a suit anyway? And how did they escape decompression?
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
1/10 for scriptwriting
Complete and utter garbage.
How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you are
wearing a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being used when
their were on the ship.
They were wearing the suits and the suits contained communication
systems. The first scene told you that
It didn't sound like any radio to me. Where did the carbon dioxide go
which they breathed out? It would have been far cheaper to have
pressurised the entire space station and used large CO2 scrubbers than
build lots of smaller ones for constant use in space suits.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for the air
you need to breath and do your job properly?
You mean like paying for the tools you need to mine coal or ore? People
have done that in the past
We are not talking about the past. These people were employees not
self-employed contractors. If they were self-employed they would have
brought their own ship which would have been fully pressurised just like
building sub-contractors bring their own bulldozers, forklifts, cabins
and cranes.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily find on
the planet instead of gold or platinum?
Because at this time all the mineable deposits of all these things have
become depleted on Earth?
Where did it say that? There's plenty of minerals in the Earth's mantle.

Why didn't they mine copper or Mars (assuming this was set in our solar
system and the asteroid belt is beyond Mars) or one of Jupiter's moons?
Post by Andrew M
Because a new use for copper has been found
Like what? What's wrong with recycling?
Post by Andrew M
that makes it especially vauable? More likely this mining mission is on
the borders of profitability, which is why the Doctor's gambit works.
It's a venture thatmakes a little bit of money but not a huge amount.
It would have made more sense if these people had been employed by a
company to build a ship in space.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill the
people wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?
It's software. I'm pretty sure people don't design computers that can be
locked up by ransomware, but if there's a back door, especially one
which doesn't identify the person activating it.... Why wuld anyone wear
one? Just a guess - maybe the company didn't let them in on the whole
"Your suit will kill you" thing
You've got to be joking. A company using a space suit which killed it's
occupants would have been latched on by the media and politicians and
they would never have been allowed to get away with it. Computer
software is designed so that it cannot put it's users lives in jeopardy.
When the NHS computers were infected by a virus all the MRI scanners
were shut down and scans were canceled to protect patients lives.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
A total fucking utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
Aggie, you remind me of a manager I once had. He saw things in really
black and white terms. You were either great at your job, and he could
see nothing but good in what you did. Or you were shit at your job and
he could see nothing but bad in what you did. He was f***king useless as
a manager because he couldn't see shades of grey. I always suspected he
was on the spectrum somewhere.
Yer right. Anyone who doesn't agree with you must be autistic. Well I'll
have you know that when I read the first chapter of Synthetic Men of
Mars by Edgar Rice Burroughs I almost cried. You'll figure out why if
you read all the preceding books in sequenced. ERB did all the ground
work and set up all the back story to enable that. The same for the
final part of Gray Lensman and Children of the Lens by E E Smith.

The writer of this story did FUCK ALL to generate any empathy or emotion
let alone credible relationships!
Post by Andrew M
Your "reviews" remind me of him. You're a shit critic because you've
made up your mind before you watch the episode that you're not going to
Did the episode convince me to like it? No! It was just about bearable
until all the flashy stuff in the middle and the Doctor coming out of it
totally blind but he could still rewire a nuclear reactor control system
he'd never seen and re-programme it's software including overriding all
the safety systems. Not even Marvel's Daredevil could do something like
that and the Doctor doesn't even have any of his powers.
Post by Andrew M
like it. Do yourself a favour. Stop watching. You remind me of another
poster who was here a while back - Ignis Fatuus. Anything that wasn't
Hartnell was flawed.
Andrew M
2017-05-14 23:11:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
The Doctor is blinded and he's able to rewire and reprogramme a
nuclear reactor control system, one that he's never ever seen before?
A keyboard is a keyboard. If you can touch-type you can write a program
Last time I modified or debugged a program I needed to see the code
first so I could make changes to the right part despite the fact I can
type with my eyes closed as I have done just now, and read through the
documentation as well as needing to see which part of the IDE I was in
to do it. And we're assuming that the Doctor was able to navigate to
the relevant project code, compilers, dependencies and so on.
And let's not forget that the Doctor was typing with space gloves on.
You can't touch type with gloves on. It's ridiculous.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Moffat is totally out of his mind.
What was the point of parodying the Star Trek, "Space - the Final
Frontier" voice over only for Capaldi to make a complete and utter
fool of himself doing it?
Once again a bunch morons are sent out into space, on a mining ship,
without any training and no clue whatsoever how to do anything in
accordance with health and safety regulations which look to be totally
non-existent in any case.
Yes they do have training. If you had actually watched this episode you
would know that. The opening scene tells you that these people are
trained if you just open your ears and listen. Pretty much every scene
Trained to do what? Clearly not the job they're supposed to be doing
and if they have been trained it's obvious that they didn't actually
learn anything.
Clearly, during the opening sequence, the character trying to access
the airlock knew what he had to do. All the operatives clearly knew how
to operate all the equipment they used. That would seem to imply
training, wouldn't it?
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
where the remaining four crew members are involved tells you that they
are trained.
What? Every single scene these morons appear in tells you that they are
complete and utter imbeciles reacting to events as they happen and
trying to figure out what to do whereas if they had actually been
trained and learned anything they would know how to handle any
eventuality and go though a standard procedure to deal with it like
NASA/ESA astronauts do.
Do you mean that it's just possible that their employers didn't include
the "what to when we order your suits to kill you" protocol in their
training? Why might that be do you suppose?
Post by Agamemnon
For example when the Doctor enters the station and claims to be to
official rescue team there should have been a standard procedure to
verify his identity and they would have instantly known him to be an
impostor if he did not react as expected to that procedure.
Yeah. We could have spent a good quarter-hour on that. It used to
happen back in old Who when writers had 4-6 25-minute episodes to pad
out and having the Doctor prove he wasn't a bad guy filled some time.
Trouble is, it doesn't advance the plot one inch and when you only have
forty minutes to tell the story, that's a problem. I think that's why
RTD introduced the psychic paper thing in the first place.
Post by Agamemnon
These people acted like complete amateurs like online gamers trying to
be military commanders without a clue how the military works or the
discipline to follow orders from their superiors.
Maybe because they weren't military personnel? Maybe because they're
actually just miners?
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when lecturing
about what happens if someone is exposed to empty space without a suit
and then it turning out that he's lecturing about the wrong subject.
Totally amateurish foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at the
start. Rather than write a proper relationship letting it progress and
then killing of the he has her say 'I want to have your children' to
the man and then she's killed off. Terrible writing. Absolutely
terrible. Why should I give a damn about either of them when the
writer hasn't properly introduced their characters to the audience and
built them up in advance?
Because we're not on the autistic spectrum?
Whereas the writer obviously is since he's not actually done the
character development properly. "When we get home I want to have kids
with you. Oh fuck, the radio doesn't work." The only thing that that
tells you is that the guy is a wet imbecile or a complete jerk and the
writer is even worse.
On top of that when the two of them were moving on the platforms they
were making sounds. Sound does not travel in a vacuum so why were sound
effects added for their footsteps?
Because sound is sort of useful in television drama. It develops tension.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script is in
completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks everyone watching
can read his mind and connect the missing back story in between the
lines.
Well I did. It wasn't that hard.
The job of the view is not to imagine the back story that should have
been put their by the writer. It's the writer's job to put it there.
It's a 45-minute show with - once you allow for titles, credits and a
"next time" - 40 minutes to actually tell the story. Putting in the
back story to these characters would not have moved the story forward
one inch. They were secondary characters. If they mattered to you that
was all well and good. If they didn't...
Post by Agamemnon
I didn't give a stuff for any of these people. The way it should have
been done properly was like in The Robots of Death where I actually
cared when people were killed by the robots.
Did you? I thought most of them were badly-written ciphers acted so
badly that I'd be embarassed by such performances in a Sunday School
Nativity. Still, each to his own.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees without any
consequences? This series is a complete and utter joke.
My great-great Grandad was a railway surfaceman in the 1880s. He died
when he was run over by a train. His death was recorded in the local
paper which also noted that another surfaceman had died in much the same
place two weeks earlier. There was no police investigation . The raliway
company's entire report into his death reads "Company servant. Want of
care". They didn't murder him, but neither did they care whether he
lived or died. Nor did the authorities. At what point does one become
the other?
This was not the 1880s. Both companies should have been sued. "Want of
care" is practically an admission of guilt of corporate manslaughter.
Yes. It was, specifically 1883. "Want of care" was not an admission of
guilt. It was saying that my ancestor should have been more careful.
This kind of thing was a commonplace before unions became powerful when
companies would "investigate" such things for themselves. Itb wasn't
until 1895, in Scotland, that Fatal Accident Enquiries were introduced
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a pantomime with
loony left politically motivated script writing plummeting to the
depths of the Sylvester McCoy era and even lower still.
You think that leftist views began with McCoy? Really? Actually they're
pretty much absent from McCoy's stint. Try going back further. Look
particularly at the stories written by Malcom Hulke for the Pertwee and
Tom Baker
We are talking about the loony left. If you want to do a story about
corporate greed properly then look at The Sun Makers and even then
these left wing stories were never Doctor Who's best.
Which was, as I recall, a Tom Baker story.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next 8
episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.
6/10 for entertainment
It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a 'plot'
became impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed to have
exchanged space suits with Bill and been blinded, none of which was
actually shown.
How was that "hard to follow"? I got it. Most people would, I am sure,
The showed flashes of Bill without a helmet, then with one, then
without one... then other stuff... fuck knew what was actually going on.
And then it was explained. Weren't you listening?
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
"get it". What I really don't get is your problem here. I have a hearing
problem. If words are not clearly enunciated or if there is a lot of
background noise, I don't hear them. I understood exactly what had
happened from the spoken word. Why is that so hard for you?
Television is there to SHOW. If stuff that happened has to be explained
in the dialogue then the writer has failed.
That would be like Greek Drama, then? Or silent films?
Post by Agamemnon
Even worse is if entire scenes have to be narrated by the protagonists
rather than actually filmed.
It felt like the early 90s reconstruction of Shada where Tom Baker was
brought in to narrate all the missing sections which were never filmed
because of a loony left strike at the BBC in 1979. But at least the
video was supplied with a copy of Douglas Addams' script so you could
read everything that went on. What was there here? Nothing.
How did the Doctor get blinded? By what? Why didn't Nardole give his
suit to Bill since he's a robot and robot's don't need air.
Because his head is still the organic one.
Post by Agamemnon
Why was he even wearing a suit anyway? And how did they escape decompression?
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
1/10 for scriptwriting
Complete and utter garbage.
How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you are
wearing a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being used when
their were on the ship.
They were wearing the suits and the suits contained communication
systems. The first scene told you that
It didn't sound like any radio to me. Where did the carbon dioxide go
which they breathed out? It would have been far cheaper to have
pressurised the entire space station and used large CO2 scrubbers than
build lots of smaller ones for constant use in space suits.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for the air
you need to breath and do your job properly?
You mean like paying for the tools you need to mine coal or ore? People
have done that in the past
We are not talking about the past. These people were employees not
self-employed contractors. If they were self-employed they would have
brought their own ship which would have been fully pressurised just
like building sub-contractors bring their own bulldozers, forklifts,
cabins and cranes.
Glad to see you know so much about economics in the 23rd Century. Maybe
you should write a paper on it.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily find on
the planet instead of gold or platinum?
Because at this time all the mineable deposits of all these things have
become depleted on Earth?
Where did it say that? There's plenty of minerals in the Earth's mantle.
In the mantle, yes. But that is certainly not mineable now and is never
likely to be so. Go more than a few miles down an the crust becomes
undrillable.
Post by Agamemnon
Why didn't they mine copper or Mars (assuming this was set in our solar
system and the asteroid belt is beyond Mars) or one of Jupiter's moons?
All sorts of possible reasons. Depending on how ore is moved from the
asteroid to the station the low gravity of an asteroid may well make it
cheaper to maine than a planet the size of Mars
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Because a new use for copper has been found
Like what? What's wrong with recycling?
Yeah. That's worked SO well on Earth up to now. If, however, industry
based on copper is expanding rapidly then there would be demand for new
copper that may well outpace recycling
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
that makes it especially vauable? More likely this mining mission is on
the borders of profitability, which is why the Doctor's gambit works.
It's a venture thatmakes a little bit of money but not a huge amount.
It would have made more sense if these people had been employed by a
company to build a ship in space.
That's true, but it does not negate the point.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill the
people wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?
It's software. I'm pretty sure people don't design computers that can be
locked up by ransomware, but if there's a back door, especially one
which doesn't identify the person activating it.... Why wuld anyone wear
one? Just a guess - maybe the company didn't let them in on the whole
"Your suit will kill you" thing
You've got to be joking. A company using a space suit which killed it's
occupants would have been latched on by the media and politicians and
they would never have been allowed to get away with it.
How do you know that? Where are the reporters in the asteroid belt? Who
arebthe ploiticians? As long as everyone on Earth is doing well through
profits made by companies that do business out there, do they really
care? A report comes in of a terrible accident out on the mining
station. A terrible fault resulted in the airlocks opening and all
personnel being lost. Terrible thing, but it's the price we pay for
prosperity.
Post by Agamemnon
Computer software is designed so that it cannot put it's users lives in
jeopardy.
Only because we choose to do so. Who wrote the software for the suits?
Did they build that requirement in?
Post by Agamemnon
When the NHS computers were infected by a virus all the MRI scanners
were shut down and scans were canceled to protect patients lives.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
A total fucking utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
Aggie, you remind me of a manager I once had. He saw things in really
black and white terms. You were either great at your job, and he could
see nothing but good in what you did. Or you were shit at your job and
he could see nothing but bad in what you did. He was f***king useless as
a manager because he couldn't see shades of grey. I always suspected he
was on the spectrum somewhere.
Yer right. Anyone who doesn't agree with you must be autistic. Well
I'll have you know that when I read the first chapter of Synthetic Men
of Mars by Edgar Rice Burroughs I almost cried. You'll figure out why
if you read all the preceding books in sequenced. ERB did all the
ground work and set up all the back story to enable that. The same for
the final part of Gray Lensman and Children of the Lens by E E Smith.
The writer of this story did FUCK ALL to generate any empathy or
emotion let alone credible relationships!
Post by Andrew M
Your "reviews" remind me of him. You're a shit critic because you've
made up your mind before you watch the episode that you're not going to
Did the episode convince me to like it? No! It was just about bearable
until all the flashy stuff in the middle and the Doctor coming out of
it totally blind but he could still rewire a nuclear reactor control
system he'd never seen and re-programme it's software including
overriding all the safety systems. Not even Marvel's Daredevil could do
something like that and the Doctor doesn't even have any of his powers.
Post by Andrew M
like it. Do yourself a favour. Stop watching. You remind me of another
poster who was here a while back - Ignis Fatuus. Anything that wasn't
Hartnell was flawed.
Agamemnon
2017-05-15 00:54:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Yes they do have training. If you had actually watched this
episode you would know that. The opening scene tells you that
these people are trained if you just open your ears and listen.
Pretty much every scene
Trained to do what? Clearly not the job they're supposed to be
doing and if they have been trained it's obvious that they didn't
actually learn anything.
Clearly, during the opening sequence, the character trying to access
the airlock knew what he had to do. All the operatives clearly knew
how to operate all the equipment they used. That would seem to imply
training, wouldn't it?
No it wouldn't because they weren't doing it by the book as established
procedure. Look at how NASA conducts space walks on the ISS. These
morons didn't even have safety tethers. They were doing it as they went
along like a bunch of cowboys. You even had one of these morons tell
another one that he wanted to father her children and then realised his
radio didn't work. Where were the safety checks and procedures? The
morons didn't even go thorough procedure to confirm that the Doctor was
heading the genuine rescue team and that his vessel had docked properly
with the space station let alone check that the suits worked properly.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
where the remaining four crew members are involved tells you that
they are trained.
What? Every single scene these morons appear in tells you that
they are complete and utter imbeciles reacting to events as they
happen and trying to figure out what to do whereas if they had
actually been trained and learned anything they would know how to
handle any eventuality and go though a standard procedure to deal
with it like NASA/ESA astronauts do.
Do you mean that it's just possible that their employers didn't
include the "what to when we order your suits to kill you" protocol
in their training? Why might that be do you suppose?
Their employers would never have been allowed to send them to a space
station which had no air inside it and where they had to pay for the air
they breathed. How are these morons supposed to change space suits in a
vacuum? Do their sleep in their space suits too? How do they go to the
toilet?

And if you thought this story couldn't get anymore totally moronic than
that you have the Doctor being blinded and yet being able to rewire and
reprogramme an nuclear reactor to blow up by bypassing all the safety
systems while wearing a pair of space gloves.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
For example when the Doctor enters the station and claims to be to
official rescue team there should have been a standard procedure
to verify his identity and they would have instantly known him to
be an impostor if he did not react as expected to that procedure.
Yeah. We could have spent a good quarter-hour on that. It used to
Which would have made it feel a lot more realistic.
Post by Andrew M
happen back in old Who when writers had 4-6 25-minute episodes to pad
out and having the Doctor prove he wasn't a bad guy filled some time.
Trouble is, it doesn't advance the plot one inch and when you only
Yes is does and it also provides characterisation for the supporting
cast. The nonsensical dialogue between the Doctor and his new tin dog is
what didn't advance the plot along and provided on characterisation
whatsoever.
Post by Andrew M
have forty minutes to tell the story, that's a problem. I think
that's why RTD introduced the psychic paper thing in the first
place.
The psychic paper was designed to work on one person at a time not the
entire crew. Procedures should have been followed. Look how it was done
in The Robots of Death when there were questions about how the Doctor go
onto the mining vessel and who he was as well as characterisation for
each member of the crew so you could feel something for them when they
got bumped off by the robots.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
These people acted like complete amateurs like online gamers trying
to be military commanders without a clue how the military works or
the discipline to follow orders from their superiors.
Maybe because they weren't military personnel? Maybe because they're
actually just miners?
Miners? Did they even look like miners? They couldn't mine shit in a
sewer. These were morons in space and where only put there to provide a
chorus for the Doctor to address and lecture to. What the point was of
having Polynesia and the tin dog there I don't know.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when
lecturing about what happens if someone is exposed to empty
space without a suit and then it turning out that he's
lecturing about the wrong subject. Totally amateurish
foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at
the start. Rather than write a proper relationship letting it
progress and then killing of the he has her say 'I want to have
your children' to the man and then she's killed off. Terrible
writing. Absolutely terrible. Why should I give a damn about
either of them when the writer hasn't properly introduced their
characters to the audience and built them up in advance?
Because we're not on the autistic spectrum?
Whereas the writer obviously is since he's not actually done the
character development properly. "When we get home I want to have
kids with you. Oh fuck, the radio doesn't work." The only thing
that that tells you is that the guy is a wet imbecile or a complete
jerk and the writer is even worse.
On top of that when the two of them were moving on the platforms
they were making sounds. Sound does not travel in a vacuum so why
were sound effects added for their footsteps?
Because sound is sort of useful in television drama. It develops tension.
In a vacuum? The lack of sound is what would have developed tension in
this case.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script is
in completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks
everyone watching can read his mind and connect the missing
back story in between the lines.
Well I did. It wasn't that hard.
The job of the view is not to imagine the back story that should
have been put their by the writer. It's the writer's job to put it
there.
It's a 45-minute show with - once you allow for titles, credits and
a "next time" - 40 minutes to actually tell the story. Putting in the
back story to these characters would not have moved the story forward
one inch. They were secondary characters. If they mattered to you
that was all well and good. If they didn't...
Why bother having them there at all then. 10 minutes could have been
save by cutting out the crap with the Doctor giving the wrong lecture to
the students on Earth and that information could have instead been given
out by the miners thus giving them actual characters of their own
instead of being cardboard cut outs. The stupid "Space the Final
Frontier" joke voice over could have also been cut to the same effect as
well as all the irrelevant crap with Polynesia about what's in the vault.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
I didn't give a stuff for any of these people. The way it should
have been done properly was like in The Robots of Death where I
actually cared when people were killed by the robots.
Did you? I thought most of them were badly-written ciphers acted so
badly that I'd be embarassed by such performances in a Sunday School
Nativity. Still, each to his own.
Poppycock.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees
without any consequences? This series is a complete and utter
joke.
My great-great Grandad was a railway surfaceman in the 1880s. He
died when he was run over by a train. His death was recorded in
the local paper which also noted that another surfaceman had died
in much the same place two weeks earlier. There was no police
investigation . The raliway company's entire report into his
death reads "Company servant. Want of care". They didn't murder
him, but neither did they care whether he lived or died. Nor did
the authorities. At what point does one become the other?
This was not the 1880s. Both companies should have been sued. "Want
of care" is practically an admission of guilt of corporate
manslaughter.
Yes. It was, specifically 1883. "Want of care" was not an admission
of guilt. It was saying that my ancestor should have been more
careful. This kind of thing was a commonplace before unions became
powerful when companies would "investigate" such things for
themselves. Itb wasn't until 1895, in Scotland, that Fatal Accident
Enquiries were introduced
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a
pantomime with loony left politically motivated script writing
plummeting to the depths of the Sylvester McCoy era and even
lower still.
You think that leftist views began with McCoy? Really? Actually
they're pretty much absent from McCoy's stint. Try going back
further. Look particularly at the stories written by Malcom Hulke
for the Pertwee and Tom Baker
We are talking about the loony left. If you want to do a story
about corporate greed properly then look at The Sun Makers and even
then these left wing stories were never Doctor Who's best.
Which was, as I recall, a Tom Baker story.
Yes it was.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next
8 episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.
6/10 for entertainment
It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a
'plot' became impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed
to have exchanged space suits with Bill and been blinded, none
of which was actually shown.
How was that "hard to follow"? I got it. Most people would, I am sure,
The showed flashes of Bill without a helmet, then with one, then
without one... then other stuff... fuck knew what was actually going on.
And then it was explained. Weren't you listening?
This is supposed to be TELEVISION. Television is there to show things
happening not to refer to impotent events that happened in passing dialogue.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
"get it". What I really don't get is your problem here. I have a
hearing problem. If words are not clearly enunciated or if there
is a lot of background noise, I don't hear them. I understood
exactly what had happened from the spoken word. Why is that so
hard for you?
Television is there to SHOW. If stuff that happened has to be
explained in the dialogue then the writer has failed.
That would be like Greek Drama, then? Or silent films?
This is Television where things need to be shown happening not ancient
Greek drama which had limited sets and no locations except the theater
it was performed in and where there were no close ups or post production.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Even worse is if entire scenes have to be narrated by the
protagonists rather than actually filmed. It felt like the early
90s reconstruction of Shada where Tom Baker was brought in to
narrate all the missing sections which were never filmed because of
a loony left strike at the BBC in 1979. But at least the video was
supplied with a copy of Douglas Addams' script so you could read
everything that went on. What was there here? Nothing.
How did the Doctor get blinded? By what? Why didn't Nardole give
his suit to Bill since he's a robot and robot's don't need air.
Because his head is still the organic one.
Not according to the dialogue where he states that this was not his
original face, that he was an AI just like the suit AI who was his
girlfriend and where it was previously stated he was reassembled by the
Doctor.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why was he even wearing a suit anyway? And how did they escape decompression?
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
1/10 for scriptwriting
Complete and utter garbage.
How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you
are wearing a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being
used when their were on the ship.
They were wearing the suits and the suits contained
communication systems. The first scene told you that
It didn't sound like any radio to me. Where did the carbon dioxide
go which they breathed out? It would have been far cheaper to have
pressurised the entire space station and used large CO2 scrubbers
than build lots of smaller ones for constant use in space suits.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for
the air you need to breath and do your job properly?
You mean like paying for the tools you need to mine coal or ore?
People have done that in the past
We are not talking about the past. These people were employees not
self-employed contractors. If they were self-employed they would
have brought their own ship which would have been fully pressurised
just like building sub-contractors bring their own bulldozers,
forklifts, cabins and cranes.
Glad to see you know so much about economics in the 23rd Century.
Maybe you should write a paper on it.
I know enough about contractors over the centuries to work out that any
operating in the 23rd century would be no different to those today. If
they were different then the writer should have elaborated on it.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily
find on the planet instead of gold or platinum?
Because at this time all the mineable deposits of all these
things have become depleted on Earth?
Where did it say that? There's plenty of minerals in the Earth's mantle.
In the mantle, yes. But that is certainly not mineable now and is
never likely to be so. Go more than a few miles down an the crust
becomes undrillable.
You don't need to drill it, just bring it to the top.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why didn't they mine copper or Mars (assuming this was set in our
solar system and the asteroid belt is beyond Mars) or one of
Jupiter's moons?
All sorts of possible reasons. Depending on how ore is moved from
the asteroid to the station the low gravity of an asteroid may well
make it cheaper to maine than a planet the size of Mars
Ah, gravity... Another sign of how moronic the story was. It's perfectly
ok for the company to provide artificial gravity for it's workers on
board the station which they don't really need and would require the
power output of something like a mini black hole but providing oxygen is
unprofitable? Who was the moron who came up with this crap? He he ever
written science fiction before?

Where does the fuel for the ships come from? If they already have
artificial gravity then the size of Mars doesn't matter a jot. They can
simply use their gravity drives to float up.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Because a new use for copper has been found
Like what? What's wrong with recycling?
Yeah. That's worked SO well on Earth up to now. If, however,
It has.
Post by Andrew M
industry based on copper is expanding rapidly then there would be
demand for new copper that may well outpace recycling
Poppycock. What industry based on copper are the alluding to? Why hasn't
it been replaced with graphene? What hasn't the writer set up the back
story properly?
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
that makes it especially vauable? More likely this mining mission
is on the borders of profitability, which is why the Doctor's
gambit works. It's a venture thatmakes a little bit of money but
not a huge amount.
It would have made more sense if these people had been employed by
a company to build a ship in space.
That's true, but it does not negate the point.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill
the people wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?
It's software. I'm pretty sure people don't design computers that
can be locked up by ransomware, but if there's a back door,
especially one which doesn't identify the person activating
it.... Why wuld anyone wear one? Just a guess - maybe the company
didn't let them in on the whole "Your suit will kill you" thing
You've got to be joking. A company using a space suit which killed
it's occupants would have been latched on by the media and
politicians and they would never have been allowed to get away with
it.
How do you know that? Where are the reporters in the asteroid belt?
Reporters get everywhere these days so you can expect they do in the
future. What to stop the space station occupants from phoning them or
contacting them on the internet or social media?
Post by Andrew M
Who arebthe ploiticians? As long as everyone on Earth is doing well
through profits made by companies that do business out there, do they
really care? A report comes in of a terrible accident out on the
mining station. A terrible fault resulted in the airlocks opening and
all personnel being lost. Terrible thing, but it's the price we pay
for prosperity.
Poppycock. There would be an immediate inquest into the miners deaths
and a criminal investigation and the opposition would use it to try to
bring down the government.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Computer software is designed so that it cannot put it's users
lives in jeopardy.
Only because we choose to do so. Who wrote the software for the
suits? Did they build that requirement in?
The suits would never have been passed by health an safety for use in
space if they could not be overridden by their occupants or contained
ways they could kill them.

And notice you've not even addressed my main contention. How can a blind
man rewire and reprogrammed the safety systems of a nuclear reactor
wearing a pair of space gloves?!
The Doctor
2017-05-15 04:12:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Yes they do have training. If you had actually watched this
episode you would know that. The opening scene tells you that
these people are trained if you just open your ears and listen.
Pretty much every scene
Trained to do what? Clearly not the job they're supposed to be
doing and if they have been trained it's obvious that they didn't
actually learn anything.
Clearly, during the opening sequence, the character trying to access
the airlock knew what he had to do. All the operatives clearly knew
how to operate all the equipment they used. That would seem to imply
training, wouldn't it?
No it wouldn't because they weren't doing it by the book as established
procedure. Look at how NASA conducts space walks on the ISS. These
morons didn't even have safety tethers. They were doing it as they went
along like a bunch of cowboys. You even had one of these morons tell
another one that he wanted to father her children and then realised his
radio didn't work. Where were the safety checks and procedures? The
morons didn't even go thorough procedure to confirm that the Doctor was
heading the genuine rescue team and that his vessel had docked properly
with the space station let alone check that the suits worked properly.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
where the remaining four crew members are involved tells you that
they are trained.
What? Every single scene these morons appear in tells you that
they are complete and utter imbeciles reacting to events as they
happen and trying to figure out what to do whereas if they had
actually been trained and learned anything they would know how to
handle any eventuality and go though a standard procedure to deal
with it like NASA/ESA astronauts do.
Do you mean that it's just possible that their employers didn't
include the "what to when we order your suits to kill you" protocol
in their training? Why might that be do you suppose?
Their employers would never have been allowed to send them to a space
station which had no air inside it and where they had to pay for the air
they breathed. How are these morons supposed to change space suits in a
vacuum? Do their sleep in their space suits too? How do they go to the
toilet?
And if you thought this story couldn't get anymore totally moronic than
that you have the Doctor being blinded and yet being able to rewire and
reprogramme an nuclear reactor to blow up by bypassing all the safety
systems while wearing a pair of space gloves.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
For example when the Doctor enters the station and claims to be to
official rescue team there should have been a standard procedure
to verify his identity and they would have instantly known him to
be an impostor if he did not react as expected to that procedure.
Yeah. We could have spent a good quarter-hour on that. It used to
Which would have made it feel a lot more realistic.
Post by Andrew M
happen back in old Who when writers had 4-6 25-minute episodes to pad
out and having the Doctor prove he wasn't a bad guy filled some time.
Trouble is, it doesn't advance the plot one inch and when you only
Yes is does and it also provides characterisation for the supporting
cast. The nonsensical dialogue between the Doctor and his new tin dog is
what didn't advance the plot along and provided on characterisation
whatsoever.
Post by Andrew M
have forty minutes to tell the story, that's a problem. I think
that's why RTD introduced the psychic paper thing in the first
place.
The psychic paper was designed to work on one person at a time not the
entire crew. Procedures should have been followed. Look how it was done
in The Robots of Death when there were questions about how the Doctor go
onto the mining vessel and who he was as well as characterisation for
each member of the crew so you could feel something for them when they
got bumped off by the robots.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
These people acted like complete amateurs like online gamers trying
to be military commanders without a clue how the military works or
the discipline to follow orders from their superiors.
Maybe because they weren't military personnel? Maybe because they're
actually just miners?
Miners? Did they even look like miners? They couldn't mine shit in a
sewer. These were morons in space and where only put there to provide a
chorus for the Doctor to address and lecture to. What the point was of
having Polynesia and the tin dog there I don't know.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
You have Capaldi drawing a skull on the blackboard when
lecturing about what happens if someone is exposed to empty
space without a suit and then it turning out that he's
lecturing about the wrong subject. Totally amateurish
foreshadowing by someone who thinks Doctor Who is a
sentimentalist situation comedy. More sentimentalist crap at
the start. Rather than write a proper relationship letting it
progress and then killing of the he has her say 'I want to have
your children' to the man and then she's killed off. Terrible
writing. Absolutely terrible. Why should I give a damn about
either of them when the writer hasn't properly introduced their
characters to the audience and built them up in advance?
Because we're not on the autistic spectrum?
Whereas the writer obviously is since he's not actually done the
character development properly. "When we get home I want to have
kids with you. Oh fuck, the radio doesn't work." The only thing
that that tells you is that the guy is a wet imbecile or a complete
jerk and the writer is even worse.
On top of that when the two of them were moving on the platforms
they were making sounds. Sound does not travel in a vacuum so why
were sound effects added for their footsteps?
Because sound is sort of useful in television drama. It develops tension.
In a vacuum? The lack of sound is what would have developed tension in
this case.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
The entire emphasis of the drivel masquerading as a script is
in completely the wrong direction and the writer thinks
everyone watching can read his mind and connect the missing
back story in between the lines.
Well I did. It wasn't that hard.
The job of the view is not to imagine the back story that should
have been put their by the writer. It's the writer's job to put it
there.
It's a 45-minute show with - once you allow for titles, credits and
a "next time" - 40 minutes to actually tell the story. Putting in the
back story to these characters would not have moved the story forward
one inch. They were secondary characters. If they mattered to you
that was all well and good. If they didn't...
Why bother having them there at all then. 10 minutes could have been
save by cutting out the crap with the Doctor giving the wrong lecture to
the students on Earth and that information could have instead been given
out by the miners thus giving them actual characters of their own
instead of being cardboard cut outs. The stupid "Space the Final
Frontier" joke voice over could have also been cut to the same effect as
well as all the irrelevant crap with Polynesia about what's in the vault.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
I didn't give a stuff for any of these people. The way it should
have been done properly was like in The Robots of Death where I
actually cared when people were killed by the robots.
Did you? I thought most of them were badly-written ciphers acted so
badly that I'd be embarassed by such performances in a Sunday School
Nativity. Still, each to his own.
Poppycock.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
How can a company be allowed to murder its own employees
without any consequences? This series is a complete and utter
joke.
My great-great Grandad was a railway surfaceman in the 1880s. He
died when he was run over by a train. His death was recorded in
the local paper which also noted that another surfaceman had died
in much the same place two weeks earlier. There was no police
investigation . The raliway company's entire report into his
death reads "Company servant. Want of care". They didn't murder
him, but neither did they care whether he lived or died. Nor did
the authorities. At what point does one become the other?
This was not the 1880s. Both companies should have been sued. "Want
of care" is practically an admission of guilt of corporate
manslaughter.
Yes. It was, specifically 1883. "Want of care" was not an admission
of guilt. It was saying that my ancestor should have been more
careful. This kind of thing was a commonplace before unions became
powerful when companies would "investigate" such things for
themselves. Itb wasn't until 1895, in Scotland, that Fatal Accident
Enquiries were introduced
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Doctor Who has been turned into something worse than a
pantomime with loony left politically motivated script writing
plummeting to the depths of the Sylvester McCoy era and even
lower still.
You think that leftist views began with McCoy? Really? Actually
they're pretty much absent from McCoy's stint. Try going back
further. Look particularly at the stories written by Malcom Hulke
for the Pertwee and Tom Baker
We are talking about the loony left. If you want to do a story
about corporate greed properly then look at The Sun Makers and even
then these left wing stories were never Doctor Who's best.
Which was, as I recall, a Tom Baker story.
Yes it was.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
If the series isn't already dead by now it will be if the next
8 episodes have Capaldi thinking he's Daredevil.
6/10 for entertainment
It stopped being entertaining the monument the parody of a
'plot' became impossible to follow when the Doctor is supposed
to have exchanged space suits with Bill and been blinded, none
of which was actually shown.
How was that "hard to follow"? I got it. Most people would, I am sure,
The showed flashes of Bill without a helmet, then with one, then
without one... then other stuff... fuck knew what was actually going on.
And then it was explained. Weren't you listening?
This is supposed to be TELEVISION. Television is there to show things
happening not to refer to impotent events that happened in passing dialogue.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
"get it". What I really don't get is your problem here. I have a
hearing problem. If words are not clearly enunciated or if there
is a lot of background noise, I don't hear them. I understood
exactly what had happened from the spoken word. Why is that so
hard for you?
Television is there to SHOW. If stuff that happened has to be
explained in the dialogue then the writer has failed.
That would be like Greek Drama, then? Or silent films?
This is Television where things need to be shown happening not ancient
Greek drama which had limited sets and no locations except the theater
it was performed in and where there were no close ups or post production.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Even worse is if entire scenes have to be narrated by the
protagonists rather than actually filmed. It felt like the early
90s reconstruction of Shada where Tom Baker was brought in to
narrate all the missing sections which were never filmed because of
a loony left strike at the BBC in 1979. But at least the video was
supplied with a copy of Douglas Addams' script so you could read
everything that went on. What was there here? Nothing.
How did the Doctor get blinded? By what? Why didn't Nardole give
his suit to Bill since he's a robot and robot's don't need air.
Because his head is still the organic one.
Not according to the dialogue where he states that this was not his
original face, that he was an AI just like the suit AI who was his
girlfriend and where it was previously stated he was reassembled by the
Doctor.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why was he even wearing a suit anyway? And how did they escape decompression?
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
1/10 for scriptwriting
Complete and utter garbage.
How can you talk to each other through a vacuum even if you
are wearing a spacesuit? There is no sign of any radio being
used when their were on the ship.
They were wearing the suits and the suits contained
communication systems. The first scene told you that
It didn't sound like any radio to me. Where did the carbon dioxide
go which they breathed out? It would have been far cheaper to have
pressurised the entire space station and used large CO2 scrubbers
than build lots of smaller ones for constant use in space suits.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone work for a company where you have to pay for
the air you need to breath and do your job properly?
You mean like paying for the tools you need to mine coal or ore?
People have done that in the past
We are not talking about the past. These people were employees not
self-employed contractors. If they were self-employed they would
have brought their own ship which would have been fully pressurised
just like building sub-contractors bring their own bulldozers,
forklifts, cabins and cranes.
Glad to see you know so much about economics in the 23rd Century.
Maybe you should write a paper on it.
I know enough about contractors over the centuries to work out that any
operating in the 23rd century would be no different to those today. If
they were different then the writer should have elaborated on it.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why would you mine copper from asteroids which you can readily
find on the planet instead of gold or platinum?
Because at this time all the mineable deposits of all these
things have become depleted on Earth?
Where did it say that? There's plenty of minerals in the Earth's mantle.
In the mantle, yes. But that is certainly not mineable now and is
never likely to be so. Go more than a few miles down an the crust
becomes undrillable.
You don't need to drill it, just bring it to the top.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why didn't they mine copper or Mars (assuming this was set in our
solar system and the asteroid belt is beyond Mars) or one of
Jupiter's moons?
All sorts of possible reasons. Depending on how ore is moved from
the asteroid to the station the low gravity of an asteroid may well
make it cheaper to maine than a planet the size of Mars
Ah, gravity... Another sign of how moronic the story was. It's perfectly
ok for the company to provide artificial gravity for it's workers on
board the station which they don't really need and would require the
power output of something like a mini black hole but providing oxygen is
unprofitable? Who was the moron who came up with this crap? He he ever
written science fiction before?
Where does the fuel for the ships come from? If they already have
artificial gravity then the size of Mars doesn't matter a jot. They can
simply use their gravity drives to float up.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Because a new use for copper has been found
Like what? What's wrong with recycling?
Yeah. That's worked SO well on Earth up to now. If, however,
It has.
Post by Andrew M
industry based on copper is expanding rapidly then there would be
demand for new copper that may well outpace recycling
Poppycock. What industry based on copper are the alluding to? Why hasn't
it been replaced with graphene? What hasn't the writer set up the back
story properly?
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
that makes it especially vauable? More likely this mining mission
is on the borders of profitability, which is why the Doctor's
gambit works. It's a venture thatmakes a little bit of money but
not a huge amount.
It would have made more sense if these people had been employed by
a company to build a ship in space.
That's true, but it does not negate the point.
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Why would anyone build a space suit with the ability to kill
the people wearing it? Why would anyone wear one?
It's software. I'm pretty sure people don't design computers that
can be locked up by ransomware, but if there's a back door,
especially one which doesn't identify the person activating
it.... Why wuld anyone wear one? Just a guess - maybe the company
didn't let them in on the whole "Your suit will kill you" thing
You've got to be joking. A company using a space suit which killed
it's occupants would have been latched on by the media and
politicians and they would never have been allowed to get away with
it.
How do you know that? Where are the reporters in the asteroid belt?
Reporters get everywhere these days so you can expect they do in the
future. What to stop the space station occupants from phoning them or
contacting them on the internet or social media?
Post by Andrew M
Who arebthe ploiticians? As long as everyone on Earth is doing well
through profits made by companies that do business out there, do they
really care? A report comes in of a terrible accident out on the
mining station. A terrible fault resulted in the airlocks opening and
all personnel being lost. Terrible thing, but it's the price we pay
for prosperity.
Poppycock. There would be an immediate inquest into the miners deaths
and a criminal investigation and the opposition would use it to try to
bring down the government.
Post by Andrew M
Post by Agamemnon
Computer software is designed so that it cannot put it's users
lives in jeopardy.
Only because we choose to do so. Who wrote the software for the
suits? Did they build that requirement in?
The suits would never have been passed by health an safety for use in
space if they could not be overridden by their occupants or contained
ways they could kill them.
And notice you've not even addressed my main contention. How can a blind
man rewire and reprogrammed the safety systems of a nuclear reactor
wearing a pair of space gloves?!
Very loud indeed.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Last Doctor
2017-05-14 08:46:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
A total fucking utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
You don't like Doctor Who when it's fantasy, you don't like it when it's
SF ... put simply, in the words of Chas'n'Dave, There Ain't No Pleasing You.
--
Bashir: What I want to know is, out of all the stories you told me which
ones were true and which ones weren't?
Garak: My dear doctor...they're all true.
Bashir: Even the lies?
Garak: Especially the lies.
The Doctor
2017-05-14 12:25:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
A total f*ing utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
You don't like Doctor Who when it's fantasy, you don't like it when it's
SF ... put simply, in the words of Chas'n'Dave, There Ain't No Pleasing You.
Who? Me?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Last Doctor
2017-05-14 12:45:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
A total f*ing utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
You don't like Doctor Who when it's fantasy, you don't like it when it's
SF ... put simply, in the words of Chas'n'Dave, There Ain't No Pleasing You.
Who? Me?
Since that was a response to Aggy's vituperative froth against the
episode, and you weren't on that thread - I'm going to go with "no".

Why would you imagine that a post to Aggy about Aggy's rant would be
about you?
--
Bashir: What I want to know is, out of all the stories you told me which
ones were true and which ones weren't?
Garak: My dear doctor...they're all true.
Bashir: Even the lies?
Garak: Especially the lies.
The Doctor
2017-05-14 12:46:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
A total f*ing utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
You don't like Doctor Who when it's fantasy, you don't like it when it's
SF ... put simply, in the words of Chas'n'Dave, There Ain't No Pleasing You.
Who? Me?
Since that was a response to Aggy's vituperative froth against the
episode, and you weren't on that thread - I'm going to go with "no".
Why would you imagine that a post to Aggy about Aggy's rant would be
about you?
Chas'n'Dave
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Last Doctor
2017-05-14 12:51:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
A total f*ing utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
You don't like Doctor Who when it's fantasy, you don't like it when it's
SF ... put simply, in the words of Chas'n'Dave, There Ain't No Pleasing You.
Who? Me?
Since that was a response to Aggy's vituperative froth against the
episode, and you weren't on that thread - I'm going to go with "no".
Why would you imagine that a post to Aggy about Aggy's rant would be
about you?
Chas'n'Dave
Ah. Sorry, English cultural reference.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chas_%26_Dave

'Chas & Dave (often billed as Chas 'n' Dave) are an English pop rock
duo, most notable as creators and performers of a musical style labelled
"rockney" (a portmanteau of "rock" and "cockney"), which mixes "pub
singalong, music-hall humour, boogie-woogie piano and pre-Beatles rock
'n' roll".'

In 1982, their single "Ain't No Pleasing You" reached no. 2 in the
British charts. (The follow up, "Tottenham Tottenham", featuring a
certain FA Cup football squad, peaked at no. 19).
--
Bashir: What I want to know is, out of all the stories you told me which
ones were true and which ones weren't?
Garak: My dear doctor...they're all true.
Bashir: Even the lies?
Garak: Especially the lies.
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:20:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
A total f*ing utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
You don't like Doctor Who when it's fantasy, you don't like it when it's
SF ... put simply, in the words of Chas'n'Dave, There Ain't No
Pleasing You.
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Who? Me?
Since that was a response to Aggy's vituperative froth against the
episode, and you weren't on that thread - I'm going to go with "no".
Why would you imagine that a post to Aggy about Aggy's rant would be
about you?
Chas'n'Dave
Ah. Sorry, English cultural reference.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chas_%26_Dave
'Chas & Dave (often billed as Chas 'n' Dave) are an English pop rock
duo, most notable as creators and performers of a musical style labelled
"rockney" (a portmanteau of "rock" and "cockney"), which mixes "pub
singalong, music-hall humour, boogie-woogie piano and pre-Beatles rock
'n' roll".'
In 1982, their single "Ain't No Pleasing You" reached no. 2 in the
British charts. (The follow up, "Tottenham Tottenham", featuring a
certain FA Cup football squad, peaked at no. 19).
Hoot Spoofs all right.

I am an avid Arsenal Fan who said Yes Wenger get us into the CL 2017/8,
win the FA Cup and get a sucessor all before May is outs!.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 16:17:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
A total fucking utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
You don't like Doctor Who when it's fantasy, you don't like it when it's
SF ... put simply, in the words of Chas'n'Dave, There Ain't No Pleasing You.
And the ratings for this travesty of a pantomime?

3.57m! The lowest overnights EVER!

The same slot last series got 4.85m.

That's a drop of 1.3 million viewers with no excuse of England playing
World Cup Rugby or late night scheduling or anything else to account for
the huge drop of 26% in viewer numbers except that the story was comple
and utter crap and an insult to the viewer's intelligence. It began 5
minutes earlier than its usual regular time and the fact that Eurovision
was on after it should have booted the ratings.

The last time Moffat did science fiction was The Rebel Flesh/The Almost
people which I liked and thought was the best in the season. Matt
Smith's tenure was generally Space Opera but Capaldi's has been nothing
but irrational incoherent sentimentalist crap.

People have had enough of it and turned off just like they did with
Sylvester McCoy.
Tim Bruening
2017-05-14 17:50:23 UTC
Permalink
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

At the end, the Doctor succeeds in saving two of the workers, and brings them to corporate HQ to complain about their experiences. But what about the replacement workers? Why doesn't the Doctor warn them about the homocidal spacesuits, then bring them back to Earth also?
Agamemnon
2017-05-14 18:03:26 UTC
Permalink
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
At the end, the Doctor succeeds in saving two of the workers, and
brings them to corporate HQ to complain about their experiences. But
what about the replacement workers? Why doesn't the Doctor warn them
about the homocidal spacesuits, then bring them back to Earth also?
Because this story isn't really about corporate murder or mining
asteroids. It's sentimentalist crap designed to get the Doctor blinded
(with no credible explanation as to how that came to be) and turn him
into Superdaredevil for Moffat's warped PC loony agenda which has
totally destroyed the ratings for this show by turning it into a
travesty of a pantomime.
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:34:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
At the end, the Doctor succeeds in saving two of the workers, and
brings them to corporate HQ to complain about their experiences. But
what about the replacement workers? Why doesn't the Doctor warn them
about the homocidal spacesuits, then bring them back to Earth also?
Because this story isn't really about corporate murder or mining
asteroids. It's sentimentalist crap designed to get the Doctor blinded
(with no credible explanation as to how that came to be) and turn him
into Superdaredevil for Moffat's warped PC loony agenda which has
totally destroyed the ratings for this show by turning it into a
travesty of a pantomime.
Ratings? Looks like IPlayer still needs to be counted.

What about overseas and IPTV?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:29:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Bruening
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
At the end, the Doctor succeeds in saving two of the workers, and brings
them to corporate HQ to complain about their experiences. But what
about the replacement workers? Why doesn't the Doctor warn them about
the homocidal spacesuits, then bring them back to Earth also?
Protest launched by surviving workers.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
The Doctor
2017-05-14 22:28:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Last Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
The zero gravity sequence at the start was very well done but
unfortunately it was ruined by the story itself which was complete and
utter clueless lunatistical codswallop.
A total utterly moronic travesty of a PANTOMIME!!!!!!!!
You don't like Doctor Who when it's fantasy, you don't like it when it's
SF ... put simply, in the words of Chas'n'Dave, There Ain't No Pleasing You.
And the ratings for this travesty of a pantomime?
3.57m! The lowest overnights EVER!
The same slot last series got 4.85m.
That's a drop of 1.3 million viewers with no excuse of England playing
World Cup Rugby or late night scheduling or anything else to account for
the huge drop of 26% in viewer numbers except that the story was comple
and utter crap and an insult to the viewer's intelligence. It began 5
minutes earlier than its usual regular time and the fact that Eurovision
was on after it should have booted the ratings.
The last time Moffat did science fiction was The Rebel Flesh/The Almost
people which I liked and thought was the best in the season. Matt
Smith's tenure was generally Space Opera but Capaldi's has been nothing
but irrational incoherent sentimentalist crap.
People have had enough of it and turned off just like they did with
Sylvester McCoy.
And I saw the BBC launch of Oxygen. Do I count?

I am using a legal subscription!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
UK Stop Theresa MAy MT V2 and Impotent Corbyn, Vote Farron and LDEm!!
Loading...