Discussion:
The Day Doctor Who Died
Add Reply
Agamemnon
2017-07-15 04:10:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.

A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...



...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."

"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.

http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y

Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.

"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."

"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."

"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Tim Bruening
2017-07-15 06:53:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on the appeal of Doctor Who?
The Doctor
2017-07-15 14:09:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on the appeal of Doctor Who?
Homosexaulity has no place in a family show.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Tim Bruening
2017-07-15 20:00:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on the
appeal of Doctor Who?
Homosexaulity has no place in a family show.
What about "Modern Family"?
The Doctor
2017-07-15 21:44:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on the
appeal of Doctor Who?
Homosexaulity has no place in a family show.
What about "Modern Family"?
That too.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Agamemnon
2017-07-15 21:33:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on the appeal of Doctor Who?
"Viewers slam Doctor Who and BBC for 'promoting gay agenda'"

http://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/549212/Doctor-Who-BBC-gay-bias
The Doctor
2017-07-15 21:47:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on the
appeal of Doctor Who?
"Viewers slam Doctor Who and BBC for 'promoting gay agenda'"
http://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/549212/Doctor-Who-BBC-gay-bias
Thank you!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Tim Bruening
2017-07-16 09:12:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on the appeal of Doctor Who?
"Viewers slam Doctor Who and BBC for 'promoting gay agenda'"
http://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/549212/Doctor-Who-BBC-gay-bias
Next step: A march led by Agamemnon on BBC HQ!
The Doctor
2017-07-16 12:29:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on
the appeal of Doctor Who?
Post by Agamemnon
"Viewers slam Doctor Who and BBC for 'promoting gay agenda'"
http://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/549212/Doctor-Who-BBC-gay-bias
Next step: A march led by Agamemnon on BBC HQ!
If a female take the role of Doctor Who lead, the boos will
be loud.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Tim Bruening
2017-07-16 22:10:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on
the appeal of Doctor Who?
Post by Agamemnon
"Viewers slam Doctor Who and BBC for 'promoting gay agenda'"
http://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/549212/Doctor-Who-BBC-gay-bias
Next step: A march led by Agamemnon on BBC HQ!
If a female take the role of Doctor Who lead, the boos will
be loud.
With fans rioting in the streets?
Agamemnon
2017-07-16 22:24:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on
the appeal of Doctor Who?
Post by Agamemnon
"Viewers slam Doctor Who and BBC for 'promoting gay agenda'"
http://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/549212/Doctor-Who-BBC-gay-bias
Next step: A march led by Agamemnon on BBC HQ!
If a female take the role of Doctor Who lead, the boos will
be loud.
With fans rioting in the streets?
They're already rioting on Facebook and forums have had to be shut down.
Tim Bruening
2017-07-16 22:38:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on
the appeal of Doctor Who?
Post by Agamemnon
"Viewers slam Doctor Who and BBC for 'promoting gay agenda'"
http://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/549212/Doctor-Who-BBC-gay-bias
Next step: A march led by Agamemnon on BBC HQ!
If a female take the role of Doctor Who lead, the boos will
be loud.
With fans rioting in the streets?
They're already rioting on Facebook and forums have had to be shut down.
Are they organizing marches and letter writing campaigns? #DoctorWhoResistance.
Your Name
2017-07-17 01:41:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
If a female take the role of Doctor Who lead, the boos will
be loud.
With fans rioting in the streets?
They're already rioting on Facebook and forums have had to be shut down.
Are they organizing marches and letter writing campaigns?
#DoctorWhoResistance.
The actress is either very brave or very stupid to even take on the
role. Her career could quite easily be badly damaged by all the trouble
the gender-change causes.
The Doctor
2017-07-17 02:38:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Your Name
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
If a female take the role of Doctor Who lead, the boos will
be loud.
With fans rioting in the streets?
They're already rioting on Facebook and forums have had to be shut down.
Are they organizing marches and letter writing campaigns?
#DoctorWhoResistance.
The actress is either very brave or very stupid to even take on the
role. Her career could quite easily be badly damaged by all the trouble
the gender-change causes.
Damaged is an understatment. The word destroyed comes to mind.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Tim Bruening
2017-07-17 02:55:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by Your Name
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
If a female take the role of Doctor Who lead, the boos will
be loud.
With fans rioting in the streets?
They're already rioting on Facebook and forums have had to be shut down.
Are they organizing marches and letter writing campaigns?
#DoctorWhoResistance.
The actress is either very brave or very stupid to even take on the
role. Her career could quite easily be badly damaged by all the trouble
the gender-change causes.
Damaged is an understatment. The word destroyed comes to mind.
Are you afraid that Jodie will be driven inane by hate calls? Are you afraid that her home will be vandalized?
The Doctor
2017-07-17 03:12:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Your Name
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
If a female take the role of Doctor Who lead, the boos will
be loud.
With fans rioting in the streets?
They're already rioting on Facebook and forums have had to be shut down.
Are they organizing marches and letter writing campaigns?
#DoctorWhoResistance.
The actress is either very brave or very stupid to even take on the
role. Her career could quite easily be badly damaged by all the trouble
the gender-change causes.
Damaged is an understatment. The word destroyed comes to mind.
Are you afraid that Jodie will be driven inane by hate calls? Are you
afraid that her home will be vandalized?
Not that. She will be villified if she carries through. Worst
than Jonathan Powell.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Tim Bruening
2017-07-17 10:44:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Your Name
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
If a female take the role of Doctor Who lead, the boos will
be loud.
With fans rioting in the streets?
They're already rioting on Facebook and forums have had to be shut down.
Are they organizing marches and letter writing campaigns?
#DoctorWhoResistance.
The actress is either very brave or very stupid to even take on the
role. Her career could quite easily be badly damaged by all the trouble
the gender-change causes.
Damaged is an understatment. The word destroyed comes to mind.
Are you afraid that Jodie will be driven inane by hate calls? Are you
afraid that her home will be vandalized?
Not that. She will be villified if she carries through. Worst
than Jonathan Powell.
With the alt-right demonstrating in front of her home o scare her into quitting?
The Doctor
2017-07-17 15:00:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Your Name
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
If a female take the role of Doctor Who lead, the boos will
be loud.
With fans rioting in the streets?
They're already rioting on Facebook and forums have had to be
shut down.
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Your Name
Post by Tim Bruening
Are they organizing marches and letter writing campaigns?
#DoctorWhoResistance.
The actress is either very brave or very stupid to even take on the
role. Her career could quite easily be badly damaged by all the trouble
the gender-change causes.
Damaged is an understatment. The word destroyed comes to mind.
Are you afraid that Jodie will be driven inane by hate calls? Are you
afraid that her home will be vandalized?
Not that. She will be villified if she carries through. Worst
than Jonathan Powell.
With the alt-right demonstrating in front of her home o scare her into quitting?
You mean the BNP or UKIP?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
The Doctor
2017-07-17 02:01:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..."
Moffat on the
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the
characters
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a
considerable lack
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on
the appeal of Doctor Who?
Post by Agamemnon
"Viewers slam Doctor Who and BBC for 'promoting gay agenda'"
http://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/549212/Doctor-Who-BBC-gay-bias
Next step: A march led by Agamemnon on BBC HQ!
If a female take the role of Doctor Who lead, the boos will
be loud.
With fans rioting in the streets?
They're already rioting on Facebook and forums have had to be shut down.
Are they organizing marches and letter writing campaigns? #DoctorWhoResistance.
#jodiewhittakersavedoctorwhobyresigningnow!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
The Doctor
2017-07-17 01:59:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on
the appeal of Doctor Who?
Post by Agamemnon
"Viewers slam Doctor Who and BBC for 'promoting gay agenda'"
http://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/549212/Doctor-Who-BBC-gay-bias
Next step: A march led by Agamemnon on BBC HQ!
If a female take the role of Doctor Who lead, the boos will
be loud.
With fans rioting in the streets?
They're already rioting on Facebook and forums have had to be shut down.
More to come.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
The Doctor
2017-07-17 01:54:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on
the appeal of Doctor Who?
Post by Agamemnon
"Viewers slam Doctor Who and BBC for 'promoting gay agenda'"
http://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/549212/Doctor-Who-BBC-gay-bias
Next step: A march led by Agamemnon on BBC HQ!
If a female take the role of Doctor Who lead, the boos will
be loud.
With fans rioting in the streets?
With Fans blockading access to BBC studios!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Tim Bruening
2017-07-17 02:06:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on
the appeal of Doctor Who?
Post by Agamemnon
"Viewers slam Doctor Who and BBC for 'promoting gay agenda'"
http://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/549212/Doctor-Who-BBC-gay-bias
Next step: A march led by Agamemnon on BBC HQ!
If a female take the role of Doctor Who lead, the boos will
be loud.
With fans rioting in the streets?
With Fans blockading access to BBC studios!
Pictures at 11?
The Doctor
2017-07-17 02:56:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor
Who fans
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath.
How are we
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..."
Moffat on the
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the
characters
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's
era with the
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just
for comedic
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care
about them
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a
considerable lack
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by Agamemnon
of it." All down to script writing.
Do other fans agree with you about the negative affects of gays on
the appeal of Doctor Who?
Post by Agamemnon
"Viewers slam Doctor Who and BBC for 'promoting gay agenda'"
http://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/549212/Doctor-Who-BBC-gay-bias
Next step: A march led by Agamemnon on BBC HQ!
If a female take the role of Doctor Who lead, the boos will
be loud.
With fans rioting in the streets?
With Fans blockading access to BBC studios!
Pictures at 11?
Maybe longer.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
The Doctor
2017-07-15 14:06:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Any other sources apart from Youtube?

I remind you Chibnall is a continuation of Davies and Moffat.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Agamemnon
2017-07-15 19:39:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Any other sources apart from Youtube?
I remind you Chibnall is a continuation of Davies and Moffat.
Let's hope he follows Davies and not Moffat.
The Doctor
2017-07-15 21:44:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Agamemnon
Post by The Doctor
Post by Agamemnon
For all those asking asking me for evidence that other Doctor Who fans
agree with me.
A comparison between the writing styles of RTD and Stephen Moffat...
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
...concluding that, based on Moffat's writing, "the Doctor is an
inconsistent, incompetent, selfish, egotistical, sociopath. How are we
as an audience supposed to care for such and unappealing character."
"When Davies applied humour it was oozing with purpose..." Moffat on the
other hand does not understand characterization.
http://youtu.be/NO6apb7ZW8Y
Moffat doesn't understand the plot twist, or foreshadowing.
"... the relationship between many characters, as well as the characters
themselves, felt so fake and two dimensional", in Moffat's era with the
"... realistic character aspect totally trampled on." Characters were
"... cardboard cut outs, rather than the genuine article."
"Moffat bluntly uses humour exclusively for the purpose of creating
funny moments, while Davies uses humour expertly, not just for comedic
effect, but also to humanize the characters and make us care about them
even more."
"Davies' version has constant tone, and Moffat's has a considerable lack
of it." All down to script writing.
Any other sources apart from Youtube?
I remind you Chibnall is a continuation of Davies and Moffat.
Let's hope he follows Davies and not Moffat.
Let's neither and not follow his Torchwood past.

The smart money is that Kris Marshall will be the next Doctor
after Capaldi.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
sadako
2017-07-17 02:04:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
It died in 1981, surely.
Your Name
2017-07-17 06:45:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by sadako
It died in 1981, surely.
Nah. It had an ocasional heart flutter (McPoirot, Quitopher, Crapaldi,
the garbage Americanised movie, etc.), but now it's had a full-blown
haert attack and is attached to life-support machines. :-(
The Doctor
2017-07-17 14:45:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Your Name
Post by sadako
It died in 1981, surely.
Nah. It had an ocasional heart flutter (McPoirot, Quitopher, Crapaldi,
the garbage Americanised movie, etc.), but now it's had a full-blown
haert attack and is attached to life-support machines. :-(
2 raving nutbars for you.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
The Doctor
2017-07-17 02:54:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by sadako
It died in 1981, surely.
You are sadder than Stephen Wilson.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Tim Bruening
2017-07-17 14:21:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
It died in 1981, surely.
You are sadder than Stephen Wilson.
N for New Doctor.
The Doctor
2017-07-17 15:10:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
It died in 1981, surely.
You are sadder than Stephen Wilson.
N for New Doctor.
Wrong thread.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
sadako
2017-07-18 07:29:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
It died in 1981, surely.
You are sadder than Stephen Wilson.
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Look who's talking....
s***@gmail.com
2017-07-18 08:33:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
That'll be Yads. You know, the Christian extremist who wants to get Jodie pregnant and/or assassinate Chibnall.
The Doctor
2017-07-18 15:14:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by s***@gmail.com
That'll be Yads. You know, the Christian extremist who wants to get
Jodie pregnant and/or assassinate Chibnall.
You sir are slanderous! I do not advocate assassination!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Tim Bruening
2017-07-18 23:10:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by s***@gmail.com
That'll be Yads. You know, the Christian extremist who wants to get
Jodie pregnant and/or assassinate Chibnall.
You sir are slanderous! I do not advocate assassination!!
But you want to get Jodie pregnant?:)
The Doctor
2017-07-18 23:30:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by The Doctor
Post by s***@gmail.com
That'll be Yads. You know, the Christian extremist who wants to get
Jodie pregnant and/or assassinate Chibnall.
You sir are slanderous! I do not advocate assassination!!
But you want to get Jodie pregnant?:)
The lie is the assassination of Chibnal.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
The Doctor
2017-07-18 15:13:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
It died in 1981, surely.
You are sadder than Stephen Wilson.
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Look who's talking....
I am taking to SAD-ako !


You do not care for DW post Tom Baker.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
sadako
2017-07-22 05:53:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by sadako
Look who's talking....
I am trolling at SAD-ako !
Fixed that for you.
You do not care for DW post Tom Baker.
Of course I don't. Every production team since then has been unfit for purpose and has usually rewritten the Doctor in their own incompetent, fannish, cultish sentimentally drippy image.
The Doctor
2017-07-22 05:59:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by sadako
Post by sadako
Look who's talking....
I am trolling at SAD-ako !
Fixed that for you.
You do not care for DW post Tom Baker.
Of course I don't. Every production team since then has been unfit for
purpose and has usually rewritten the Doctor in their own incompetent,
fannish, cultish sentimentally drippy image.
So why stay around here?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
sadako
2017-07-22 06:16:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
Post by sadako
Look who's talking....
I am trolling at SAD-ako !
Fixed that for you.
You do not care for DW post Tom Baker.
Of course I don't. Every production team since then has been unfit for
purpose and has usually rewritten the Doctor in their own incompetent,
fannish, cultish sentimentally drippy image.
So why stay around here?
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Because I was a fan of the show once.
The Doctor
2017-07-22 14:23:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
Post by sadako
Look who's talking....
I am trolling at SAD-ako !
Fixed that for you.
You do not care for DW post Tom Baker.
Of course I don't. Every production team since then has been unfit for
purpose and has usually rewritten the Doctor in their own incompetent,
fannish, cultish sentimentally drippy image.
So why stay around here?
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Because I was a fan of the show once.
Christmas might be that last time I give an episode above 5/10.

Some of the trash episodes for me in this run include Gridlock, Midnight,
Love and Mosters, and Lazarus Experiment.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
sadako
2017-07-22 19:42:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
Post by sadako
Look who's talking....
I am trolling at SAD-ako !
Fixed that for you.
You do not care for DW post Tom Baker.
Of course I don't. Every production team since then has been unfit for
purpose and has usually rewritten the Doctor in their own incompetent,
fannish, cultish sentimentally drippy image.
So why stay around here?
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Because I was a fan of the show once.
Christmas might be that last time I give an episode above 5/10.
Some of the trash episodes for me in this run include Gridlock, Midnight,
Love and Mosters, and Lazarus Experiment.
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Love & Monsters WAS ghastly, I'll agree there.

For me the other worst are Warriors of the Deep, Twin Dilemma, Time and the Rani, Last of the Time Lords, Let's Kill Hitler, The Doctor The Widow and the Wardrobe, Death in Heaven, The Witch's Familiar.
The Doctor
2017-07-22 22:28:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
Post by sadako
Look who's talking....
I am trolling at SAD-ako !
Fixed that for you.
You do not care for DW post Tom Baker.
Of course I don't. Every production team since then has been unfit for
purpose and has usually rewritten the Doctor in their own incompetent,
fannish, cultish sentimentally drippy image.
So why stay around here?
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53
on Atheism
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Because I was a fan of the show once.
Christmas might be that last time I give an episode above 5/10.
Some of the trash episodes for me in this run include Gridlock, Midnight,
Love and Mosters, and Lazarus Experiment.
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Love & Monsters WAS ghastly, I'll agree there.
For me the other worst are Warriors of the Deep, Twin Dilemma, Time and
the Rani, Last of the Time Lords, Let's Kill Hitler, The Doctor The
Widow and the Wardrobe, Death in Heaven, The Witch's Familiar.
What about Timelash?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
sadako
2017-07-23 01:41:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
Post by sadako
Look who's talking....
I am trolling at SAD-ako !
Fixed that for you.
You do not care for DW post Tom Baker.
Of course I don't. Every production team since then has been unfit for
purpose and has usually rewritten the Doctor in their own incompetent,
fannish, cultish sentimentally drippy image.
So why stay around here?
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53
on Atheism
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Because I was a fan of the show once.
Christmas might be that last time I give an episode above 5/10.
Some of the trash episodes for me in this run include Gridlock, Midnight,
Love and Mosters, and Lazarus Experiment.
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Love & Monsters WAS ghastly, I'll agree there.
For me the other worst are Warriors of the Deep, Twin Dilemma, Time and
the Rani, Last of the Time Lords, Let's Kill Hitler, The Doctor The
Widow and the Wardrobe, Death in Heaven, The Witch's Familiar.
What about Timelash?
--
That was bad, but I can least understand why it was bad, and I could live with it in the canon.

Infact to be honest, I could probably sit through it easier than The Doctor, The Widow and The Wardrobe which, although better produced, is still a slog to get through.
Tim Bruening
2017-07-23 03:08:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by sadako
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
Post by sadako
Look who's talking....
I am trolling at SAD-ako !
Fixed that for you.
You do not care for DW post Tom Baker.
Of course I don't. Every production team since then has been unfit for
purpose and has usually rewritten the Doctor in their own incompetent,
fannish, cultish sentimentally drippy image.
So why stay around here?
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53
on Atheism
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Because I was a fan of the show once.
Christmas might be that last time I give an episode above 5/10.
Some of the trash episodes for me in this run include Gridlock, Midnight,
Love and Mosters, and Lazarus Experiment.
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Love & Monsters WAS ghastly, I'll agree there.
For me the other worst are Warriors of the Deep, Twin Dilemma, Time and
the Rani, Last of the Time Lords, Let's Kill Hitler, The Doctor The
Widow and the Wardrobe, Death in Heaven, The Witch's Familiar.
What about Timelash?
--
That was bad, but I can least understand why it was bad, and I could live with it in the canon.
What did it establish in the canon?
sadako
2017-07-23 03:27:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by sadako
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
Post by sadako
Look who's talking....
I am trolling at SAD-ako !
Fixed that for you.
You do not care for DW post Tom Baker.
Of course I don't. Every production team since then has been unfit for
purpose and has usually rewritten the Doctor in their own incompetent,
fannish, cultish sentimentally drippy image.
So why stay around here?
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53
on Atheism
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Because I was a fan of the show once.
Christmas might be that last time I give an episode above 5/10.
Some of the trash episodes for me in this run include Gridlock, Midnight,
Love and Mosters, and Lazarus Experiment.
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Love & Monsters WAS ghastly, I'll agree there.
For me the other worst are Warriors of the Deep, Twin Dilemma, Time and
the Rani, Last of the Time Lords, Let's Kill Hitler, The Doctor The
Widow and the Wardrobe, Death in Heaven, The Witch's Familiar.
What about Timelash?
--
That was bad, but I can least understand why it was bad, and I could live with it in the canon.
What did it establish in the canon?
Beyond hinting an untelevised Pertwee story, nothing really.
sadako
2017-07-23 07:09:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by sadako
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
Post by sadako
Look who's talking....
I am trolling at SAD-ako !
Fixed that for you.
You do not care for DW post Tom Baker.
Of course I don't. Every production team since then has been unfit for
purpose and has usually rewritten the Doctor in their own incompetent,
fannish, cultish sentimentally drippy image.
So why stay around here?
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53
on Atheism
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Because I was a fan of the show once.
Christmas might be that last time I give an episode above 5/10.
Some of the trash episodes for me in this run include Gridlock, Midnight,
Love and Mosters, and Lazarus Experiment.
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Love & Monsters WAS ghastly, I'll agree there.
For me the other worst are Warriors of the Deep, Twin Dilemma, Time and
the Rani, Last of the Time Lords, Let's Kill Hitler, The Doctor The
Widow and the Wardrobe, Death in Heaven, The Witch's Familiar.
What about Timelash?
--
That was bad, but I can least understand why it was bad, and I could live with it in the canon.
What did it establish in the canon?
What I meant by "I could live with it in the canon" is that I don't think it did substantial damage to the canon, or ruination to the Doctor's character, whereas I think say Warriors of the Deep or Twin Dilemma did.
Tim Bruening
2017-07-23 15:25:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by sadako
Post by Tim Bruening
Post by sadako
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
Post by sadako
Look who's talking....
I am trolling at SAD-ako !
Fixed that for you.
You do not care for DW post Tom Baker.
Of course I don't. Every production team since then has been unfit for
purpose and has usually rewritten the Doctor in their own incompetent,
fannish, cultish sentimentally drippy image.
So why stay around here?
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53
on Atheism
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Because I was a fan of the show once.
Christmas might be that last time I give an episode above 5/10.
Some of the trash episodes for me in this run include Gridlock, Midnight,
Love and Mosters, and Lazarus Experiment.
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Love & Monsters WAS ghastly, I'll agree there.
For me the other worst are Warriors of the Deep, Twin Dilemma, Time and
the Rani, Last of the Time Lords, Let's Kill Hitler, The Doctor The
Widow and the Wardrobe, Death in Heaven, The Witch's Familiar.
What about Timelash?
--
That was bad, but I can least understand why it was bad, and I could live with it in the canon.
What did it establish in the canon?
What I meant by "I could live with it in the canon" is that I don't think it did substantial damage to the canon, or ruination to the Doctor's character, whereas I think say Warriors of the Deep or Twin Dilemma did.
How?

The Doctor
2017-07-23 12:33:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
Post by sadako
Look who's talking....
I am trolling at SAD-ako !
Fixed that for you.
You do not care for DW post Tom Baker.
Of course I don't. Every production team since then has been unfit for
purpose and has usually rewritten the Doctor in their own incompetent,
fannish, cultish sentimentally drippy image.
So why stay around here?
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53
on Atheism
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Because I was a fan of the show once.
Christmas might be that last time I give an episode above 5/10.
Some of the trash episodes for me in this run include Gridlock, Midnight,
Love and Mosters, and Lazarus Experiment.
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53
on Atheism
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Love & Monsters WAS ghastly, I'll agree there.
For me the other worst are Warriors of the Deep, Twin Dilemma, Time and
the Rani, Last of the Time Lords, Let's Kill Hitler, The Doctor The
Widow and the Wardrobe, Death in Heaven, The Witch's Familiar.
What about Timelash?
--
That was bad, but I can least understand why it was bad, and I could
live with it in the canon.
Infact to be honest, I could probably sit through it easier than The
Doctor, The Widow and The Wardrobe which, although better produced, is
still a slog to get through.
I am a fan of CS Lewis hence why I love TDTWaTW
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Tim Bruening
2017-07-23 03:06:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
Post by sadako
Look who's talking....
I am trolling at SAD-ako !
Fixed that for you.
You do not care for DW post Tom Baker.
Of course I don't. Every production team since then has been unfit for
purpose and has usually rewritten the Doctor in their own incompetent,
fannish, cultish sentimentally drippy image.
So why stay around here?
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53
on Atheism
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Because I was a fan of the show once.
Christmas might be that last time I give an episode above 5/10.
Some of the trash episodes for me in this run include Gridlock, Midnight,
Love and Mosters, and Lazarus Experiment.
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Love & Monsters WAS ghastly, I'll agree there.
For me the other worst are Warriors of the Deep, Twin Dilemma, Time and
the Rani, Last of the Time Lords, Let's Kill Hitler, The Doctor The
Widow and the Wardrobe, Death in Heaven, The Witch's Familiar.
What about Timelash?
What canonized items from Timelash do you object to?
The Doctor
2017-07-23 12:40:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by sadako
Post by sadako
Look who's talking....
I am trolling at SAD-ako !
Fixed that for you.
You do not care for DW post Tom Baker.
Of course I don't. Every production team since then has been unfit for
purpose and has usually rewritten the Doctor in their own incompetent,
fannish, cultish sentimentally drippy image.
So why stay around here?
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53
on Atheism
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Because I was a fan of the show once.
Christmas might be that last time I give an episode above 5/10.
Some of the trash episodes for me in this run include Gridlock, Midnight,
Love and Mosters, and Lazarus Experiment.
--
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Post by The Doctor
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53
on Atheism
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Post by The Doctor
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Love & Monsters WAS ghastly, I'll agree there.
For me the other worst are Warriors of the Deep, Twin Dilemma, Time and
the Rani, Last of the Time Lords, Let's Kill Hitler, The Doctor The
Widow and the Wardrobe, Death in Heaven, The Witch's Familiar.
What about Timelash?
What canonized items from Timelash do you object to?
ave ou ever seen Timelash, TB?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
Loading...